Discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT. It is worth two (2) points. You are required to respond to the question to get credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for this

Discussion  is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT. It is worth two (2) points. You are required  to respond to the question to get credit for the assignment by the due  date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you will  receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading criterion  associated with this assignment. Your work will be compared against your  peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You will be able to review every  other submission once you complete your entry, so please note that  copying other people’s responses will not be tolerated. Click the link  to review the weekly question.

Chapter 5 presented the University of California Health System’s ERM development and  In Chapter 3 presented the approach Mars, Incorporated used to implement ERM  . In what ways are the two organization’s approaches to ERM similar?  How do they differ? Choose one aspect of each ERM implementation from  which the other organization would benefit and explain why.  

To complete this assignment, you must do the following:

A) Create a new thread. As indicated above, describe in  what ways the two organization’s approaches to ERM are similar. Also,  explain how they differ. Choose one aspect of each ERM implementation  from which the other organization would benefit and explain why.

B)  Select AT LEAST 3 other students' threads and post substantive comments  on those threads, evaluating the pros and cons of that student’s  recommendations. Your comments should extend the conversation started  with the thread.

ALL original posts and comments must be substantive. (I'm looking for about a paragraph - not just "I agree.")

NOTE:  These discussions should be informal discussions, NOT research papers.  If you MUST directly quote a resource, then cite it properly. However, I  would much rather simply read your words.