Disaster Recovery Planning Discussion
EK17
2 years ago
10
files (1)PeerReviewandResponseRubricCriteria.pdf
PeerReviewandResponseRubricCriteria.pdf
Discussion Board Rubric Criteria Unsatisfactory Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total Ideas, Arguments, & Analysis
0-15 points 16-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25
Ideas expressed lack an understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are irrelevant, off-topic, and/or confusing to follow
Ideas expressed in discussion posts show a minimal understanding of the discussion topic. Comments are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant.
Ideas expressed in discussion posts are mostly substantive and relevant to topic; some original thought.
Ideas expressed in discussion posts include original thought, substantial depth, and are relevant to topic.
Connection to Course Materials
0-15 points 16-19 points 20-22 points 23-25 points /25
No connections are made to readings or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.)
Minimal direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.)
Some direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.)
Strong, direct connections are made to readings and/or other course materials (lectures, media, resources, etc.)
Writing Quality 0-4 points 5-6 points 7-8 points 9-10 points /10 Reviews show a below average/poor writing style that lacks standard English, and/or is difficult for readers to follow. Contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
Review shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English that is generally clear but contains some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
Review shows above average writing style that is clear using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or spelling.
Review shows above average writing style that is clear using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and/or spelling.
Required Peer Response/ Timeliness
0-10 points 11-20 points 21-30 points 31-40 points /40
One peer review mission or both responses are below 50 words.
Missing one peer review or both responses are below 100 words.
Completed both peer reviews, but responses did not meet 150 words.
Both peer reviews consist of at least 150 words and provide a thoughtful response.
TOTAL POINTS (sum of Criteria) /100
- Business Ethics 2
- SOCW-6301-6500-WK8-Discussions
- Ethics in Psychology
- Suhh
- For this Assignment, select a sexually violent offender. Then consider any social, environmental, psychological, and/or biological factors that may have contributed to the sexually violent offender’s behavior.
- Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay - Part I Prewriting Due Week 2 and worth 30 points When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage
- Project change management
- wk3 assigment
- Module 2 - Background ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN DIFFICULT SITUATIONS Required Reading For your SLP assignment, please read the following article. De Cremer, D., & de Bettignies, H. (2013). Pragmatic business ethics. Business Strategy Review, 24(2), 64-67
- MISS PROFESSOR ONLY
