digital slide presentation

Presentation on Literacy in Bilingual Settings - Rubric Total 65 points

Criterion 1. No Submission 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target

Instructional Approaches

to Develop Biliterate

Reading

Instructional Approaches to

Develop Biliterate Reading

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

inadequately described.

7.22 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

minimally described.

8.48 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

completely described.

9.75 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

described in depth.

Instructional Approaches

to Develop Biliterate

Writing

Instructional Approaches to

Develop Biliterate Writing

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

inadequately described.

7.22 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

minimally described.

8.48 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

completely described.

9.75 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

described in depth.

Research-Based Reading

Strategies for L1 and L2

Research-Based Reading

Strategies for L1 and L2

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are

inappropriate for students.

7.22 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are

underdeveloped.

8.48 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are creative

and appropriate for students.

9.75 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are

innovative and well-crafted

for students.

Research-Based Writing

Strategies for L1 and L2

Research-Based Writing

Strategies for L1 and L2

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are inappropriate

for students.

7.22 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are

underdeveloped.

8.48 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are creative and

appropriate for students.

9.75 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are innovative and

well-crafted for students.

At-Home Literacy

Strategies

At-Home Literacy Strategies

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are ineffective.

7.22 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are overly

simplistic.

8.48 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are detailed and

effective.

9.75 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are novel and

sophisticated.

Title Slide, Slide Notes, and

Research Citations

Title Slide, Slide Notes, and

Research Citations

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

No title slide or slide notes

are present. Reference slide

includes errors and/or

inconsistently used citations.

Sources are noncredible.

2.41 points

Title slide, and/or slide notes,

and/or reference slide are

not present. Sources do not

fully support claims, or

sources are not all credible.

Sources are documented,

although several errors are

present.

2.83 points

Title slide and slide notes are

present. In-text citations

have few errors. References

used are reliable and

reference slide lists all cited

sources with few errors.

3.25 points

Title slide and thorough slide

notes are present. In-text

citations and a reference

slide are complete and

correct. Sources are credible.

The documentation of cited

sources is free of error.

Language Use and

Audience Awareness

Language Use and Audience

Awareness

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

Inappropriate word choice is

evident. Language is not

reflective of the targeted

audience.

2.41 points

Some distracting

inconsistencies or repetitions

in word choice are present.

Language is lacking

awareness of the targeted

audience.

2.83 points

Word choice is reflective of

the intended audience, uses

a variety of appropriate

vocabulary, and

communicates clearly.

3.25 points

Word choice is distinctive,

creative, and well-suited to

the purpose, discipline,

scope, and audience of the

presentation.

Layout

Layout

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

The layout is cluttered,

confusing, and does not use

spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the

readability. The text is

extremely difficult to read

2.41 points

The layout shows some

structure but appears

cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of

white space or a distracting

background. Overall

2.83 points

The layout background and

text complement each other

and enable the content to be

easily read. The fonts are

easy to read and point size

3.25 points

The layout is visually pleasing

and contributes to the

overall message with

appropriate use of headings,

subheadings, and white

space. Text is appropriate in© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Criterion 1. No Submission 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target with long blocks of text, small

point size for fonts, and

inappropriate contrasting

colors. Poor use of headings,

subheadings, indentations,

or bold formatting is evident.

readability is difficult due to

lengthy paragraphs, too

many different fonts, dark or

busy background, overuse of

bold, or lack of appropriate

indentations of text.

varies appropriately for

headings and text.

length for the target

audience and to the point.

The background and colors

enhance the readability of

the text.

Organization

Organization

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

An attempt is made to

organize the content, but the

sequence is indiscernible.

The ideas presented are

compartmentalized and may

not relate to each other.

2.41 points

The content is not well

organized even though it

provides the audience with a

sense of the main idea.

2.83 points

The content is logically

organized. The ideas

presented relate to each

other. The content provides

the audience with a clear

sense of the main idea.

3.25 points

The content is well-organized

and logical. There is a

sequential progression of

ideas that relate to each

other. The content is

presented as a cohesive unit

and provides the audience

with a clear sense of the

main idea.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling,

capitalization, punctuation,

grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes include errors in

grammar or syntax that are

pervasive and impede

meaning. Incorrect sentence

structure errors are found

throughout.

2.41 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes include frequent and

repetitive mechanical errors.

Inconsistencies in sentence

structure are recurrent.

2.83 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes include a few

mechanical errors. Suitable

sentence structure is used.

3.25 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes are free of mechanical

errors. Skilled control of

sentence structure is used

throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation on Literacy in Bilingual Settings - Rubric Total 65 points

Criterion 1. No Submission 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target

Instructional Approaches

to Develop Biliterate

Reading

Instructional Approaches to

Develop Biliterate Reading

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

inadequately described.

7.22 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

minimally described.

8.48 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

completely described.

9.75 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate reading are

described in depth.

Instructional Approaches

to Develop Biliterate

Writing

Instructional Approaches to

Develop Biliterate Writing

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

inadequately described.

7.22 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

minimally described.

8.48 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

completely described.

9.75 points

Instructional approaches to

develop biliterate writing are

described in depth.

Research-Based Reading

Strategies for L1 and L2

Research-Based Reading

Strategies for L1 and L2

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are

inappropriate for students.

7.22 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are

underdeveloped.

8.48 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are creative

and appropriate for students.

9.75 points

Research-based reading

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support reading

comprehension, are

innovative and well-crafted

for students.

Research-Based Writing

Strategies for L1 and L2

Research-Based Writing

Strategies for L1 and L2

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are inappropriate

for students.

7.22 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are

underdeveloped.

8.48 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are creative and

appropriate for students.

9.75 points

Research-based writing

strategies for L1 and L2,

including strategies that

support emerging bilingual

learners, are innovative and

well-crafted for students.

At-Home Literacy

Strategies

At-Home Literacy Strategies

0 points

Not addressed.

6.73 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are ineffective.

7.22 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are overly

simplistic.

8.48 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are detailed and

effective.

9.75 points

At-home literacy strategies

that can be implemented by

families to support student

literacy development in both

languages are novel and

sophisticated.

Title Slide, Slide Notes, and

Research Citations

Title Slide, Slide Notes, and

Research Citations

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

No title slide or slide notes

are present. Reference slide

includes errors and/or

inconsistently used citations.

Sources are noncredible.

2.41 points

Title slide, and/or slide notes,

and/or reference slide are

not present. Sources do not

fully support claims, or

sources are not all credible.

Sources are documented,

although several errors are

present.

2.83 points

Title slide and slide notes are

present. In-text citations

have few errors. References

used are reliable and

reference slide lists all cited

sources with few errors.

3.25 points

Title slide and thorough slide

notes are present. In-text

citations and a reference

slide are complete and

correct. Sources are credible.

The documentation of cited

sources is free of error.

Language Use and

Audience Awareness

Language Use and Audience

Awareness

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

Inappropriate word choice is

evident. Language is not

reflective of the targeted

audience.

2.41 points

Some distracting

inconsistencies or repetitions

in word choice are present.

Language is lacking

awareness of the targeted

audience.

2.83 points

Word choice is reflective of

the intended audience, uses

a variety of appropriate

vocabulary, and

communicates clearly.

3.25 points

Word choice is distinctive,

creative, and well-suited to

the purpose, discipline,

scope, and audience of the

presentation.

Layout

Layout

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

The layout is cluttered,

confusing, and does not use

spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the

readability. The text is

extremely difficult to read

2.41 points

The layout shows some

structure but appears

cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of

white space or a distracting

background. Overall

2.83 points

The layout background and

text complement each other

and enable the content to be

easily read. The fonts are

easy to read and point size

3.25 points

The layout is visually pleasing

and contributes to the

overall message with

appropriate use of headings,

subheadings, and white

space. Text is appropriate in© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Criterion 1. No Submission 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target with long blocks of text, small

point size for fonts, and

inappropriate contrasting

colors. Poor use of headings,

subheadings, indentations,

or bold formatting is evident.

readability is difficult due to

lengthy paragraphs, too

many different fonts, dark or

busy background, overuse of

bold, or lack of appropriate

indentations of text.

varies appropriately for

headings and text.

length for the target

audience and to the point.

The background and colors

enhance the readability of

the text.

Organization

Organization

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

An attempt is made to

organize the content, but the

sequence is indiscernible.

The ideas presented are

compartmentalized and may

not relate to each other.

2.41 points

The content is not well

organized even though it

provides the audience with a

sense of the main idea.

2.83 points

The content is logically

organized. The ideas

presented relate to each

other. The content provides

the audience with a clear

sense of the main idea.

3.25 points

The content is well-organized

and logical. There is a

sequential progression of

ideas that relate to each

other. The content is

presented as a cohesive unit

and provides the audience

with a clear sense of the

main idea.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling,

capitalization, punctuation,

grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Not addressed.

2.24 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes include errors in

grammar or syntax that are

pervasive and impede

meaning. Incorrect sentence

structure errors are found

throughout.

2.41 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes include frequent and

repetitive mechanical errors.

Inconsistencies in sentence

structure are recurrent.

2.83 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes include a few

mechanical errors. Suitable

sentence structure is used.

3.25 points

Presentation and speaker’s

notes are free of mechanical

errors. Skilled control of

sentence structure is used

throughout.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.