Democratic Peace Theory and Democratization

Hello! I need help with an essay. I have already worked on the first part, but I need help with the rest. DPT and Democratization - 1 paragraph on DPT as understood in current academic/policy-making spheres (ie not Kant). - Critiques to DPT 1. the ″definitional issue″ --˃ already written, please don′t write this part. 2. the causal logic of DPT --˃ assess counter arguments for the structural/institutional logic and the normative/cultural logic. --˃please focus on someone who rejects the normative logic, as I have already done the structural/institutional part. 3. the realist argument provides a better explanation --˃please focus on Rosato 2003 - Work in Oren with his arguments as a build in for democratization: i) democratic peace doesn′t have anything to do with democracy itself, but rather attends to normative parameters. ii) said parameters change in time and together with the was the US forges itself through history. iii) the normative parameters change, but not necessarily in response to internal change, but instead it is very influenced by its foreign policy: “America’s identity has historically developed in ways that made political enemies appear subjectively further and friends subjectively closer to it” (Oren 1995, 151–53). - Democratization --˃ what it is and how it relates to DPT (400 words). - 1 paragraph conclusion on democratization PhD level Thanks a lot