deductive valid arguments in numbered premise form

Write a 500–750 word paper in response to the prompt below. Structure must follow as

· You must put the manipulation objection into numbered premise form.

· You must use in-text citations with page numbers; *use footnotes.*

· Any rational system of referencing may be used, as long as the citations include the author’s name, the work cited, publication details, date (at first mention), and page number.

· you may not use Wikipedia or similar websites).

· You must include a works cited page.

Prompt #2: In response to the manipulation objection, Hanna argues that preferences shaping nudges need not be manipulative. Present the manipulation objection in numbered premise form. And then, present and explain Hanna’s argument. How does Hanna’s initial response make contact with the manipulation objection? (I.e., Is Hanna arguing that the premises don’t support the conclusion or that some premise is false?) Explain your answer. Why doesn't Hanna's initial response vindicate the manager in the cafeteria example as described by Thaler and Sunstein? Present and explain Hanna's argument to the conclusion that Thaler and Sunstein's cafeteria manager doesn't manipulate her customers.

Below is the paper where thaler and sunsetin discuss the cafeteria example

../Philosophy/PAPER 2 /Thaler-LibertarianPaternalism FOR CAFETERIA EXAMPLE .pdf

*Below is Hanna paper discussing what I need the prompt to answer. *

../Philosophy/PAPER 2 /Hanna-LibertarianPaternalismManipulation-2015.pdf

Below is extra pdf that might help to answer but not necessarily needed

../Philosophy/PAPER 2 /The Ethics of Manipulation (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy).pdf

../Philosophy/PAPER 2 /Gorin-MANIPULATORSALWAYSTHREATEN-2014.pdf