DB Response

2

Elise Twyman

In the Lecture Notes scenario, a dangerous fugitive was on the run for stealing weapons. This is a hazardous situation. Additionally, the number of personnel available for the search was low, exacerbating the problem. Understandably, the woman would be worried, considering the danger she was facing with a fugitive on the run. Her basement door was unlocked, which added to her fear. I would have made the same decision to search her house. If it helped to ease her mind, it was a good decision. However, they searched the home poorly. This created a dangerous situation because the fugitive was later found within the home. If you are going to do something, do it correctly. There were manning and time constraints to consider in the situation. However, if you are going to take any amount of time to search the house, you should do it to the best of your ability.

I conduct myself at work as if I am constantly being watched because I am. In my career, we do not go anywhere without someone watching us. We not only have our peers watching us, but also our production and leadership. I do not work in a police department, but lives are on the line in my job. One mistake can cost someone their life. With that amount of risk, we are constantly watched. We conduct ourselves as if we are on camera because it embeds the idea that every action we take matters. I have done things that I would not do in front of my grandmother. This is because I am human and I make mistakes. Additionally, sometimes we do bad things because the outcome is what matters. In Christian ethics, there is the idea that we should only do the right things because these actions reflect God’s Character and will (Pollock, 2020). However, sometimes there are situations that one person may consider bad but another may find good. I have skipped steps or done things not according to the book because the result was the goal. Design an aircraft that can transport someone home. However, skipping steps is wrong. The result is what matters in situations like this, even though it is considered lying.

All behavior needs to be limited. Good behavior should have limits as well. Not to say that you should do bad things, but there are limits on the impacts of good things. Additionally, there are limits to intolerable behavior, such as zero tolerance. Harmful acts are negative because they produce bad results. Philippians 2:3-8 has tremendous implications for leadership. Putting others before yourself is a significant leadership quality. It is essential not to focus on your own importance, but instead on the importance of your own group (New International Version Bible, 2011, Philippians 2:3-8). The results of the mission created by your team are the most important. These results reflect your own importance as a leader.

Cameron

When it comes to difficult decision-making, especially the decision to search a residence for a fugitive, I believe it is critical to ensure that all actions are both legal and ethical. If there is probable cause or a warrant, then the search is justified. However, entering without proper legal backing could risk the case being thrown out in court or lead to civil rights violations. Acting with urgency is sometimes necessary, but we must always weigh the legal consequences and moral obligations before making a final decision (Pollock, 2022).

As a criminal justice professional, it is wise to behave as if you're always being recorded. Body cameras, cell phones, and surveillance are part of everyday life now. But even if there were no cameras, we should still act with integrity. If I wouldn't be comfortable doing something in front of my grandmother or my supervisor, then it's likely not the right choice. This way of thinking helps keep us grounded. Scripture supports this in Luke 8:17 (NIV), which says, “For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.”

Setting limits on tolerable behavior is essential in law enforcement. If we don’t set boundaries, unethical actions can slowly become accepted. This affects the entire department’s culture. When officers let small wrongs slide, it can lead to bigger problems down the line. Clear standards help maintain trust and professionalism.

Philippians 2:3–8 teaches us a powerful leadership lesson. It encourages us to lead with humility and serve others before ourselves. Jesus, though equal to God, humbled Himself to serve. In criminal justice, this means treating others with respect and making decisions based on what is best for the community, not our own pride or power.

In the child abduction scenario, the pressure would be intense. I would do everything within the law to get the suspect to reveal the child’s location. Time would be critical. I would use skilled interrogation, build rapport, and call in experts if needed. But I would not cross ethical or legal lines, because violating the suspect’s rights could ruin the case and cost the child her chance at rescue. It would be so hard not to cross the line or build up the gray area, but the risk could be far too high.  Romans 12:21 reminds us, “Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good

2

Elise Twyman

In the Lecture Notes scenario, a dangerous fugitive was on the run for stealing weapons. This is a hazardous situation. Additionally, the number of personnel available for the search was low, exacerbating the problem. Understandably, the woman would be worried, considering the danger she was facing with a fugitive on the run. Her basement door was unlocked, which added to her fear. I would have made the same decision to search her house. If it helped to ease her mind, it was a good decision. However, they searched the home poorly. This created a dangerous situation because the fugitive was later found within the home. If you are going to do something, do it correctly. There were manning and time constraints to consider in the situation. However, if you are going to take any amount of time to search the house, you should do it to the best of your ability.

I conduct myself at work as if I am constantly being watched because I am. In my career, we do not go anywhere without someone watching us. We not only have our peers watching us, but also our production and leadership. I do not work in a police department, but lives are on the line in my job. One mistake can cost someone their life. With that amount of risk, we are constantly watched. We conduct ourselves as if we are on camera because it embeds the idea that every action we take matters. I have done things that I would not do in front of my grandmother. This is because I am human and I make mistakes. Additionally, sometimes we do bad things because the outcome is what matters. In Christian ethics, there is the idea that we should only do the right things because these actions reflect God’s Character and will (Pollock, 2020). However, sometimes there are situations that one person may consider bad but another may find good. I have skipped steps or done things not according to the book because the result was the goal. Design an aircraft that can transport someone home. However, skipping steps is wrong. The result is what matters in situations like this, even though it is considered lying.

All behavior needs to be limited. Good behavior should have limits as well. Not to say that you should do bad things, but there are limits on the impacts of good things. Additionally, there are limits to intolerable behavior, such as zero tolerance. Harmful acts are negative because they produce bad results. Philippians 2:3-8 has tremendous implications for leadership. Putting others before yourself is a significant leadership quality. It is essential not to focus on your own importance, but instead on the importance of your own group (New International Version Bible, 2011, Philippians 2:3-8). The results of the mission created by your team are the most important. These results reflect your own importance as a leader.