DB 1 OSHA 2

profile77foxtrot

See attached

  • 3 months ago
  • 10
files (2)

DB1.docx

DB1

Part II: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards promulgation process is quite elaborate and provides a great deal of deliberation between OSHA and various stakeholder groups. Describe ways this might be helpful with respect to ensuring the final rule coming out of the process is the best it can be, and/or describe ways this deliberative process can have a negative impact.

Reply 1: Hudson Haas

Top of Form

Good afternoon team and Professor Warner,

My name is Hudson Haas and I am from Seguin, Texas. I am currently employed as an EHS Specialist in a chemical manufacturing plant. I am married to my lovely wife and have a 21 month old daughter. Some of my future goals include earning my bachelor's degree, completing my CSP and CHMM certifications and continuing to serve as a beacon of reason.I look at OSHA a lot like I look at the federal government: there is representation from all across the land, there are varying opinions and getting anything done in a timely manner is the easiest over bet you can make. However, at the end of the day they are the standard that is set for most of America. As I have journeyed in my career, it seems that more companies are pushing above OSHA regulations where they can to set the precedence that they are truly committed to safety. As long as OSHA is around to keep pushing the culture forward, we will continue to see less incidents.

Bottom of Form

Reply 2: Shawn HuntTop of Form

My name is Shawn, and I’m from Walterboro, SC. I currently work as a journeyman lineman, and I’ve been working in the electrical field for 26 years. Right now, I’m continuing my education in occupational safety and health. My goal is to move into a safety role, possibly with the current company I’m with now, where I can use both my field experience and what I’m learning in school to help keep workers safe on the job.

I feel the OSHA standards process can be helpful because it allows input from different groups like workers, employers, and safety experts. This helps make sure the rules are realistic and actually work in the real world. For example, workers can speak on what hazards they deal with every day, while employers can explain what is possible from a cost and operations side. This kind of back and forth can lead to better, more balanced rules that protect people without shutting down business operations.

On the other hand, the process can also be slow. Since there are so many steps and opinions involved, it can take a long time for new rules to be put in place. This can be a problem when workers are exposed to hazards that need to be addressed quickly. In some cases, delays in the process could mean people are not protected as soon as they should be.

This  process is important because it helps create strong and fair safety standards, but the time it takes can sometimes be a downsideBottom of Form