Current & Future State of Health care
6 months ago
30
Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx
Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf
Benchmark-HRManagementToolsandTeams.docx
HR Management Tools and Teams
Directions: Select a health care organization of interest and assume you have just been hired as an HR manager for that health care organization. You decide to prepare for your first day on the job by creating a document that compiles tools to manage staffing, increase work production, and improve team dynamics. Complete all four parts and the References page.
Part 1: Organization Selection
|
Selected Health Care Organization and Web Link:
|
Part 2: Staffing and Work Production
As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a departmental level . Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.
|
Quality Improvement and Management (What are you responsible for in relation to “quality improvement and management"?) 1. 2. 3. |
Improvement and Techniques (Which techniques improve quality?) 1. 2. 3.
|
|
Tools of Management (What will be your most commonly used tools of control for staffing and work production?) 1. 2. 3. |
Examples of Use (Provide examples of how you may use each of the tools of management identified.) 1. 2. 3. |
|
Benchmarks (What will be your most commonly used benchmarks?) 1. 2.
|
Examples of Use (Provide examples of how you may use each of the benchmarks identified.) 1. 2.
|
|
Organization Vision and Mission (Identify your selected organization’s mission and vision.) 1. 2. |
Alignment (How do your selected tools align to your organization’s mission and vision?) 1. 2. |
Part 3: Team Dynamics Successful Teams Employ
As an HR manager, you serve the organization at a team level . Complete the following boxes, as indicated below.
|
Characteristics (Identify characteristics of successful teams.) 1. 2. |
Practices (Identify practices of successful teams.) 1. 2. |
|
Methods and Approaches (Identify which methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaborations.) 1. 2. |
Examples of Use (Provide an example of how methods and approaches encourage a culture of collaboration. What would it look like in your organization?) 1. 2. |
Part 4: Cross-Functional Application
Today's complex organizations often require the smooth, integrated functioning of teams across several functional areas. Leading a team of diverse individuals is quite a challenge. Encouraging the effective collaboration of multiple teams of diverse individuals is even more challenging and requires skilled leaders who can understand and impart organizational vision to team members. Skilled leaders must also foster leadership skills in others to achieve collaboration and organizational success.
Imagine yourself in the complex situation of ensuring the integrated functioning of multiple teams on an organizational-wide initiative. Respond to the following in 250-500 words:
1. What knowledge and skills will you need to acquire on your own leadership development journey to successfully prepare for such a challenge? Provide specific strategies and examples.
2. Analyze two or three methods and approaches used to encourage a culture of collaboration within diverse teams, work groups, or organizations. Ensure that the methods and approaches link with the skills you identified above.
References
© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
2
image1.jpeg
Rubric-Benchmark-ProfessionalDevelopmentProgramsinHospitalSettings.pdf
Benchmark - Professional Development Programs in Hospital Settings - Rubric Total 80 points
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
Agenda for Training
Agenda for Training
0 points
An agenda for training,
including the topic being
covered, the presenter, the
location, and the time block,
is not present.
6.24 points
An agenda for training,
including the topic being
covered, the presenter, the
location, and the time block,
is present but lacks details or
incomplete.
7.2 points
An agenda for training,
including the topic being
covered, the presenter, the
location, and the time block,
is present.
8.16 points
An agenda for training,
including the topic being
covered, the presenter, the
location, and the time block,
is detailed.
9.6 points
An agenda for training,
including the topic being
covered, the presenter, the
location, and the time block,
is thorough.
Training Schedule
Training Schedule
0 points
A training schedule that
includes the necessary
preparation of who, what,
when, where, why, and how
is not present.
6.24 points
A training schedule that
includes the necessary
preparation of who, what,
when, where, why, and how
is present, but lacks details
or incomplete.
7.2 points
A training schedule that
includes the necessary
preparation of who, what,
when, where, why, and how
is present.
8.16 points
A training schedule that
includes the necessary
preparation of who, what,
when, where, why, and how
is detailed.
9.6 points
A training schedule that
includes the necessary
preparation of who, what,
when, where, why, and how
is thorough.
Practice Training Activities
and Media or Handouts
Practice Training Activities
and Media or Handouts
0 points
A description of practice
training activities and any
media or handouts to be
provided is not present.
6.24 points
A description of practice
training activities and any
media or handouts to be
provided is present but lacks
details or incomplete.
7.2 points
A description of practice
training activities and any
media or handouts to be
provided is present.
8.16 points
A description of practice
training activities and any
media or handouts to be
provided is detailed.
9.6 points
A description of practice
training activities and any
media or handouts to be
provided is thorough.
Focus of the Program
Focus of the Program
0 points
The focus of the program is
not present.
6.24 points
The focus of the program is
present but lacks details or
incomplete.
7.2 points
The focus of the program is
present.
8.16 points
The focus of the program is
detailed.
9.6 points
The focus of the program is
thorough.
Written Materials
Written Materials
0 points
A description of written
materials to be provided
during the training is not
present.
6.24 points
A description of written
materials to be provided
during the training is present
but lacks details or
incomplete.
7.2 points
A description of written
materials to be provided
during the training is
present.
8.16 points
A description of written
materials to be provided
during the training is
detailed.
9.6 points
A description of written
materials to be provided
during the training is
thorough.
Training Element
Training Element
0 points
A description of at least one
computer-, Web-, or DVD-
based training element that
will be used in the program,
including consideration of
the idea that staff may have
varying levels of technology
readiness, is not present.
6.24 points
A description of at least one
computer-, Web-, or DVD-
based training element that
will be used in the program,
including consideration of
the idea that staff may have
varying levels of technology
readiness, is present but
lacks details or incomplete.
7.2 points
A description of at least one
computer-, Web-, or DVD-
based training element that
will be used in the program,
including consideration of
the idea that staff may have
varying levels of technology
readiness, is present.
8.16 points
A description of at least one
computer-, Web-, or DVD-
based training element that
will be used in the program,
including consideration of
the idea that staff may have
varying levels of technology
readiness, is detailed.
9.6 points
A description of at least one
computer-, Web-, or DVD-
based training element that
will be used in the program,
including consideration of
the idea that staff may have
varying levels of technology
readiness, is thorough.
Leveraging Workforce
Diversity (B)
Leveraging Workforce
Diversity (C3.2)
0 points
An explanation of how
organizations can leverage
workforce diversity and a
description of the benefits of
diverse knowledge, skills, and
expertise among team
members are not present.
6.76 points
An explanation of how
organizations can leverage
workforce diversity and a
description of the benefits of
diverse knowledge, skills, and
expertise among team
members are present but
lack details or are
incomplete.
7.8 points
An explanation of how
organizations can leverage
workforce diversity and a
description of the benefits of
diverse knowledge, skills, and
expertise among team
members are present.
8.84 points
An explanation of how
organizations can leverage
workforce diversity and a
description of the benefits of
diverse knowledge, skills, and
expertise among team
members are detailed.
10.4 points
An explanation of how
organizations can leverage
workforce diversity and a
description of the benefits of
diverse knowledge, skills, and
expertise among team
members are thorough.
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
4.16 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies in
4.8 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
5.44 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. The
6.4 points
Writer is clearly in command
of standard, written, © 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is
used.
language choice (register) or
word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
the reader. Correct and
varied sentence structure
and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
writer uses a variety of
effective sentence structures
and figures of speech.
academic English.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources
(citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc.,
as appropriate to assignment
and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
3.64 points
Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
4.2 points
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, although some
formatting errors may be
present.
4.76 points
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is
mostly correct.
5.6 points
Sources are completely and
correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free
of error.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
- enaglis
- A series of 4 questions. See below
- Macroeconomics Paper
- Managerial Economics 16 Answers
- Jada invested $8,530 in a mutual fund at a time when the price per share was $10. The fund has...
- only for expert researcher
- History Essay Question
- Only for Rey...
- Help to write a movie review
- Final Paper for Chemistry