CR Deliverable 5
Fredablyee
2 years ago
8
files (2)Deliverable5ClinicalReasoningandClinicalJudgment.docx
Deliverable5TemplateCR.docx
Deliverable5ClinicalReasoningandClinicalJudgment.docx
NUR4153CBE Section 01CBE Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment (11 Weeks) - CBE Online Course - 2024 Summer Quarter
Deliverable 5 - Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Assignment Content
1.
Top of Form
Competency
Modify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.
Student Success Criteria
View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.
Scenario
You were recently invited to your alma mater to participate in a clinical judgment roundtable with alums. The audience includes nursing students enrolled in their last term before graduation. You were asked to prepare a one-to-two-page handout for the round table discussion to facilitate a conversation about the outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.
Instructions
Create a one-to-two-page handout that includes the following information:
· Summarize a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales.
· Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Resources
Submit a Word document with your handout.
Bottom of Form
· A - 4 - Mastery
Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.
0
B - 3 - Proficiency
Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.
0
C - 2 - Competence
Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.
0
F - 1 - No Pass
Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.
0
I - 0 - Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
· Criterion 2
0% of total grade
A - 4 - Mastery
Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
B - 3 - Proficiency
Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
C - 2 - Competence
Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
F - 1 - No Pass
Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
I - 0 - Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
· Criterion 3
0% of total grade
A - 4 - Mastery
Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
B - 3 - Proficiency
Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
C - 2 - Competence
Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
F - 1 - No Pass
Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
I - 0 - Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
· Criterion 4
Deliverable5TemplateCR.docx
Title
Student Name
Rasmussen University
NUR4153: Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment
Instructor Mindy Fadell
Date
Title
*Be sure to erase blue font
*Be sure to use APA use in-text citations and references to provide detailed rationale
*This should be a handout
· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Scenario
*Describe clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales. What did you see with the vital signs? What was seen with assessment? Current medication etc
Address Why this clinical Experience was Challenging: (use references to support this)
Clinical Judgement Process
CUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis
· Individual/Internal Factors (for Nurse)
Knowledge • Skills • Level of experience • Confidence • Specialty background • Personal characteristics • Prior experience, education, emotions, confidence, personal values, professional orientation, and experiential learning.
Environmental/ External Factors (for Client Situation):
Client observation • Physical environment • Resources • Health/medical records • Time pressure/urgency • Task complexity • Consequences and risks • Cultural considerations, distractions interruptions and professional autonomy
Internal Cues for Nurse:
External Cues for Patient
Priority Hypothesis: ? (Use reference support):
Why is this the priority? (Use reference support):
Intervention 1(also known as Solution): : What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Rationale (Use reference support):
Intervention 2: What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Rationale: (Use reference support):
Second Hypothesis
CUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis
·
Internal Cues for Nurse:
External Cues for Patient
Second Hypothesis:
Intervention 1: What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Rationale: (Use reference support):
Intervention 2: What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Rationale: (Use reference support):
References
See https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/references
Deliverable 5 - Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment
· Format: Create a one-to-two-page handout
|
· |
A |
B |
C |
F |
|
Criterion 1 |
Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales. |
Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales. |
Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales. |
Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales. |
|
Criterion 2 |
Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.
|
Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
|
Criterion 3 |
Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources. |
|
Criterion 4 |
Formal style is demonstrated throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors. |
Formal style is demonstrated throughout most of the document, with minor spelling, grammar, or APA format errors. |
Formal style is demonstrated in some parts of the document but not maintained throughout. Some spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present. |
Lack of formal style in the document. Numerous spelling, grammar, or APA format errors are present. |
- Industry Profile: Part 1 (Acquisition & Procurement Risk )
- I need help with marketing assignment
- Need help in project management
- Can some one help
- Tutor help
- What changes took place in the Soviet Union under Khrushchev's leadership. Would Stalin have been able to maintain his power...
- Week 6
- NEED IN 7 HOURS or LESS NO EXCEPTIONS
- Week 4 java commision calculator
- finance law homework
