Community Windshield

profileMaleficient

APA 7th edition

Follow directions on pages

Community- Village of Plainfield


  • 2 years ago
  • 15
files (3)

CommunityWindshieldSurveryAssignmentRubricFall2024pk.docx

COMMUNITY WINDSHIELD ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC

CRITERIA

SKILLED

SATISFACTORY

UNSATISFACTORY

93- 100

85-92

<84

Windshield Assessment Performs a comprehensive community assessment.

40%

Work clearly indicates that student has performed a thorough assessment using the provided community worksheet

Work indicates that the student has evaluated most aspects of the community using the worksheet provided.

Work indicates that the student has not adequately evaluated the community. Information is incomplete, with many assessment aspects missing.

Conclusion Summary:

Social, Economic and Health Related Community Needs (a minimum of one need from each category)

20%

Excellent ability to identify a minimum of 3 community needs based on assessment findings. Linkages between assessment findings and identified community needs are clear.

Good ability to identify 3 community needs based on assessment findings. Linkages between assessment findings and identified needs are not completely clear or be missing.

Less than 3 community needs identified. Minimal connection between assessment findings and identified community needs. Needs may be incompletely identified or not identified at all.

Conclusion Summary:

Healthy People 2030 Objectives

10%

Links Healthy Peoples 2030 objectives to the identified community needs and provides rationale why there needs to be an intervention.

Linkage between Healthy People 2030 objectives is not clearly articulated or fails to provide rationale for intervention

Does not identify Healthy People 2030 objectives and/or fails to link to identified community needs. Little, if any rationale for intervention

Conclusion Summary: Social Determinants of Health Impact 10%

A minimum of three social determinants of health are clearly related as to their impact on identified community needs.

Social determinants of health are not clearly specified or expressed as to their impact on the community needs.

Social determinants of health are not specified or no descriptions to their impact on community needs is noted.

Conclusion Summary:

Use of APRN roles in improving Clinical Practice

10%

Clearly articulates a minimum of three of the APRN roles utilizing the results of their Windshield Survey and provides an example of each role. Demonstrates knowledge of how an APRN utilizes the results of their Windshield survey to improve clinical practice.

Articulates and describes less than 3 roles of the APRN and/or does not provide an example of the roles. Has incomplete knowledge of how an APRN utilizes the results of their Windshield survey to improve clinical practice.

Unable to clearly articulate and/or does not provides any descriptions or examples of any roles of the APRN nor demonstrate any knowledge of how an APRN utilizes the results of their Windshield assessment survey to improve clinical practice.

Grammar and Mechanics

Appropriate voice, flow, and syntax. No slang. Paragraph size appropriate. Paper fails to flow in a logical sequence.

5%

Summary is not greater than 3 pages. Paper has minimal grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Consistent and appropriate voice. -- Sophisticated and precise word choice. --No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.

Summary is not greater than 3 pages. Minor errors in format, punctuation, capitalization do not distract from readability. Voice mostly consistent and appropriate. Lengthy paragraphs -- Fairly effective word choice.

Summary is greater than 3 pages. Many errors in format, punctuation, or capitalization. Errors distract from readability. Use of slang. Information cited is not pertinent to the topic.

Documentation/APA

6 properly cited references from EBP peer reviewed scholarly sources. Uses 7th edition APA format 5%

A more than 6 scholarly EBP peer-reviewed

sources. Minimal evidence of paraphrasing without citation noted. Information relevant to topic .All references correctly cited in the paper and on the reference page. Minimal use of secondary sources.

A minimum of 6 peer reviewed scholarly EBP sources. Minimal evidence of paraphrasing without citation noted. Information relevant to topic.

Secondhand sources or sources incorrectly cited. Does not have a minimum of 6 peer reviewed EBP scholarly sources . Articles/references minimally support the topic. Overt evidence of plagiarism.