cognitive and abnormal psych
4 pprs nned done
3 years ago
80
Untitleddocument-2023-11-23T061659.262.pdf
DiagnosisPaper-InstructionsandRubric11.pdf
DiagnosisPaper-InstructionsandRubric11.pdf
Untitleddocument-2023-11-23T061659.262.pdf
1. Watch the TED talk by Elizabeth Loftus (see link below) on whether eyewitness testimony is reliable. This is related to the concept of "observer expectancy bias", which we discussed in class. For this assignment, write a 1 page summary of 1) what Dr. Loftus discussed in the talk and 2) what you think can be done to prevent situations like Dr. Loftus describes of errors in eyewitness testimonies that can lead to tragic consequences.
Here is the link to the TED Talk: https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_loftus_how_reliable_is_your_memory?language=en
2. Read the attached article on whether it would be ethical to "erase" bad memories or even prevent them from occuring in the first place. Your assignment is to write a 1- 1 1/2 page paper 1) summarizing the article and 2) explaining your position on whether you think it is or is not a good (or ethical) thing to do. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/preventing-bad-memories-it-ethical/2008-11
3. write a 1/2-1 page summary of the talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4T41DZMAkA&t=5s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Cs7dUUrmU
4. Read the attached article on whether it would be ethical to "erase" bad memories or even prevent them from occuring in the first place. Your assignment is to write a 1- 1 1/2 page paper 1) summarizing the article and 2) explaining your position on whether you think it is or is not a good (or ethical) thing to do. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/preventing-bad-memories-it-ethical/2008-11
DiagnosisPaper-InstructionsandRubric11.pdf
Diagnosis Paper Instructions The purpose of the paper is you to think critically about mental health disorders, to obtain an in- depth understanding of a topic of interest, and to practice using APA referencing style. The paper will be 6 to 8 double-spaced pages (not including title page or references), with 1-inch margins and 12-point Times New Roman font and will include a minimum of 2 references. One of those references must be the DSM-V. The second reference must be a peer-reviewed source (not a sources like Wikipedia, Verywellmind.com and other random internet sources/websites). In-text citations and the references section must be in APA format. You may not use direct quotes from sources – all information must be paraphrased and correctly cited using APA format. Psychological disorders are often portrayed in the media, and some portrayals are more accurate than others. For this option, you will write a critical analysis of a TV, movie, or book character portraying someone with a psychological disorder (see Blackboard for a list of options). You will discuss the accuracy of the portrayal in relation to the diagnostic criteria and clinical picture of the disorder. If the diagnosis is not explicitly stated, you may provide your own diagnostic opinion by stating which diagnostic criteria the character meets. Your paper should include:
1. Descriptions of the behavioral, cognitive, and/or emotional symptoms presented by the character, and a brief review of the diagnostic criteria of the disorder. If the character does not meet all criteria for a diagnosis, be sure to talk about this. Use the DSM-V in this link or search through the library.
2. If the character is receiving treatment for their disorder, a critique of the treatment should be included. If they are not receiving treatment, give your opinion on treatment options and prognosis.
3. A discussion of the positive and negative implications of this portrayal for the general audience with respect to understanding mental disorders.
This assignment must be submitted in Word or Pages format (not PDF). If you’d like, you may turn in a draft by November 15, 2023 to get my feedback. Your final paper must be submitted on Blackboard by 11:59pm, Eastern time on November 25, 2023.
GRADING RUBRIC FOR DIAGNOSIS PAPER
Description Below Expectations Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Points
Diagnosis
Does not clearly describe the symptoms/diagnosis based on DSM V criteria. Does not tie symptoms/diagnosis to specific examples from the show/movie. Does not explain why character does/does not meet criteria. 0 – 2
Some of the symptoms of a disorder are described based on some DSM-V criteria. May not provide direct examples tying criteria to the character. May not explain which symptoms are absent. 6 – 15
Most symptoms of a disorder are clearly outlined and described using DSM-V criteria and few examples are given of how the character displays these symptoms/meets criteria and/or which symptoms are absent. 16 – 20
All symptoms of a disorder are clearly outlined and described using DSM-V criteria and sufficient examples are given of how character meets or does not meet criteria. 21 – 25
25
Treatment
Does not mention treatment. 0 – 5
Somewhat touches on treatment but not grounded on concepts learned in class or clinically proven treatments. 6 – 15
Critiques some/parts of treatment in show/movie or starts exploring treatment options, but not as thoroughly or not based on learned concepts. 16 – 20
Thoroughly critiques treatment in show/movie based on learned concepts or explores treatment options if client is not in treatment. 21 – 25
25
Implications
Does not discuss the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder for the general audience with respect to understanding mental disorders. 0 – 5
Brief discussion of the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder with respect to understanding mental disorders. 6 – 10
Adequate discussion of the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder with respect to understanding mental disorders. 11 – 15
Thorough discussion of the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder with respect to understanding mental disorders. 16 – 20
20
Writing Not well-organized; weak transitions; argument confusing to follow. 0 – 2
Somewhat well-organized or good transitions (not both); argument somewhat confusing. 3 – 5
Mostly well-organized with good transitions; argument easily followed. 6 – 8
Very well organized with solid transitions; argument easily followed. 9 – 10
10
Format
Missing 3 or more of the following: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font. 0 – 2
Missing two of the following: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double- spaced, 1-inch margins, 12- point Times New Roman font. 3 – 5
Missing one of the following: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double-spaced, 1- inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font. 6 – 8
All the following included: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double- spaced, 1-inch margins, 12- point Times New Roman font. 8 – 10
10
Mechanics
Many (10+) grammatical punctuation, and spelling errors that significantly detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure often includes poor structure (e.g., run-on sentences). 0 – 2
Several (5 - 10) grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors, but overall they do not detract too much from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is acceptable (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). 3 – 5
Few (less than 5) grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors, but overall they do not detract too much from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is acceptable (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). 6 – 8
Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are RARE (1 – 2) and do not detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is good (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). 8 – 10
10
Total Possible Points 100
DiagnosisPaper-InstructionsandRubric11.pdf
Diagnosis Paper Instructions The purpose of the paper is you to think critically about mental health disorders, to obtain an in- depth understanding of a topic of interest, and to practice using APA referencing style. The paper will be 6 to 8 double-spaced pages (not including title page or references), with 1-inch margins and 12-point Times New Roman font and will include a minimum of 2 references. One of those references must be the DSM-V. The second reference must be a peer-reviewed source (not a sources like Wikipedia, Verywellmind.com and other random internet sources/websites). In-text citations and the references section must be in APA format. You may not use direct quotes from sources – all information must be paraphrased and correctly cited using APA format. Psychological disorders are often portrayed in the media, and some portrayals are more accurate than others. For this option, you will write a critical analysis of a TV, movie, or book character portraying someone with a psychological disorder (see Blackboard for a list of options). You will discuss the accuracy of the portrayal in relation to the diagnostic criteria and clinical picture of the disorder. If the diagnosis is not explicitly stated, you may provide your own diagnostic opinion by stating which diagnostic criteria the character meets. Your paper should include:
1. Descriptions of the behavioral, cognitive, and/or emotional symptoms presented by the character, and a brief review of the diagnostic criteria of the disorder. If the character does not meet all criteria for a diagnosis, be sure to talk about this. Use the DSM-V in this link or search through the library.
2. If the character is receiving treatment for their disorder, a critique of the treatment should be included. If they are not receiving treatment, give your opinion on treatment options and prognosis.
3. A discussion of the positive and negative implications of this portrayal for the general audience with respect to understanding mental disorders.
This assignment must be submitted in Word or Pages format (not PDF). If you’d like, you may turn in a draft by November 15, 2023 to get my feedback. Your final paper must be submitted on Blackboard by 11:59pm, Eastern time on November 25, 2023.
GRADING RUBRIC FOR DIAGNOSIS PAPER
Description Below Expectations Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Points
Diagnosis
Does not clearly describe the symptoms/diagnosis based on DSM V criteria. Does not tie symptoms/diagnosis to specific examples from the show/movie. Does not explain why character does/does not meet criteria. 0 – 2
Some of the symptoms of a disorder are described based on some DSM-V criteria. May not provide direct examples tying criteria to the character. May not explain which symptoms are absent. 6 – 15
Most symptoms of a disorder are clearly outlined and described using DSM-V criteria and few examples are given of how the character displays these symptoms/meets criteria and/or which symptoms are absent. 16 – 20
All symptoms of a disorder are clearly outlined and described using DSM-V criteria and sufficient examples are given of how character meets or does not meet criteria. 21 – 25
25
Treatment
Does not mention treatment. 0 – 5
Somewhat touches on treatment but not grounded on concepts learned in class or clinically proven treatments. 6 – 15
Critiques some/parts of treatment in show/movie or starts exploring treatment options, but not as thoroughly or not based on learned concepts. 16 – 20
Thoroughly critiques treatment in show/movie based on learned concepts or explores treatment options if client is not in treatment. 21 – 25
25
Implications
Does not discuss the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder for the general audience with respect to understanding mental disorders. 0 – 5
Brief discussion of the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder with respect to understanding mental disorders. 6 – 10
Adequate discussion of the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder with respect to understanding mental disorders. 11 – 15
Thorough discussion of the positive and negative implications of character’s portrayal of the disorder with respect to understanding mental disorders. 16 – 20
20
Writing Not well-organized; weak transitions; argument confusing to follow. 0 – 2
Somewhat well-organized or good transitions (not both); argument somewhat confusing. 3 – 5
Mostly well-organized with good transitions; argument easily followed. 6 – 8
Very well organized with solid transitions; argument easily followed. 9 – 10
10
Format
Missing 3 or more of the following: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font. 0 – 2
Missing two of the following: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double- spaced, 1-inch margins, 12- point Times New Roman font. 3 – 5
Missing one of the following: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double-spaced, 1- inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font. 6 – 8
All the following included: Cover page, reference page, correct use of APA, double- spaced, 1-inch margins, 12- point Times New Roman font. 8 – 10
10
Mechanics
Many (10+) grammatical punctuation, and spelling errors that significantly detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure often includes poor structure (e.g., run-on sentences). 0 – 2
Several (5 - 10) grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors, but overall they do not detract too much from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is acceptable (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). 3 – 5
Few (less than 5) grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors, but overall they do not detract too much from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is acceptable (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). 6 – 8
Grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors are RARE (1 – 2) and do not detract from reading the paper. Basic sentence structure is good (e.g., avoids run-on sentences, sentence structure is solid). 8 – 10
10
Total Possible Points 100
- Need 2 diff paper
- BUS/475 SWOT Paper
- APPLICANT SCREENING PAPER
- Who Done It? Business Communications Assignments For this writing task, you'll need to respond to the following scenario: Who are you? You work as department head in the information technology (IT) department at First Federal Bank. Part of your job
- Questions to Answer
- PCN-435 Week 2 Biopsychosocial Development and Treatment of Addictions
- Whistleblowers- Discussion Post- Management Class
- Information System Assignment
- This is due tonight must know SPSS previous tutor couldn't finish tonight
- searching marketing SEO audit questions