Case study proposal
see attachs
3 years ago
50
TopicProposal.docx
CaseStudyProposalrequirements.docx
TopicProposal.docx
Topic Proposal
The case study will employ the Sanjay Singh and Royal Bengal Logistics Inc. case to research unregistered securities fraud. This case will examine a difficult accounting and finance ethical and regulatory issue. This will be founded on SEC fraud allegations against Sanjay Singh and Royal Bengal Logistics Inc. in an unregistered securities sale that raised $112 million. The fraud offered Haitian US clients high-yield investment packages with 12.5% to 325% guaranteed returns between 2019 and 2023. Their context and history are essential to understanding this situation. Includes regulatory framework.
The case study will explain securities offer regulation, emphasize SEC registration and compliance, and discuss how the SEC protects investors and the securities market. It will also provide income, balance, and cash flow statements to illuminate Royal Bengal Logistics Inc.'s financial condition during the alleged fraud. It will also list investors, including Sanjay Singh, Royal Bengal Logistics Inc., the SEC, and relief defendants Sheetal Singh and Constantina Celicourt and explain their case interests and duties. It will also explain how this case violates federal securities laws, including registration and anti-fraud requirements and discuss legal implications, including officer and director bars, permanent injunctions, civil monetary penalties, and disgorgement. This case study analyzes the case's many facets, highlighting stakeholders' ethical and regulatory issues and encouraging students to consider possible solutions. This real-life scenario will help students comprehend accountants' ethical duties, regulatory compliance, and the effects of financial fraud on investors and the financial market.
Thesis: Sanjay Singh and Royal Bengal Logistics Inc. case highlights ethical and regulatory issues in accounting and finance, emphasizing investor protection, securities market integrity, and careful investment examination.
I will use these resources:
· Chmiel, D. (2023). FX Ponzi Scheme Deceived 1,500 Individuals with False Promise of 325% Returns. Finance Magnates. Retrieved From: https://www.financemagnates.com/forex/fx-ponzi-scheme-deceived-1500-individuals-with-false-promise-of-325-returns/
This resource is important because it brings up the intricacies behind the case, allowing students to understand the implications in the financial world.
· Hornuf, L., Kück, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2022). Initial coin offerings, information disclosure, and fraud. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 1741-1759. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-021-00471-y
This source presents a comprehensive overview of frayed in the field. This can create an understanding of the ethics related to fraud in the accounting field.
CaseStudyProposalrequirements.docx
Case Study Proposal (3.5-5 pages, single-spaced): Below are the main components of a case study outline:
· Title
· Introduction
· Identify key problems and issues in the case study.
· Formulate and include a thesis statement that summarizes the outcome of your analysis in 1–2 sentences.
· Context and Background
· Set the scene: provide well-researched background information, relevant facts, and important information. (regulations, financial statements, compliance requirements, stakeholders, etc.)
· Divide into sections with headings and subheadings.
· Learning Outcomes
· Provide 3-4 learning outcomes expressed using Bloom’s Taxonomy terms. (Identify, Analyze, Evaluate, Recommend, etc).
· See Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Outcomes: https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy/#:~:text=Bloom's%20Taxonomy%20is%20a%20classification%20of%20the%20different%20outcomes%20and,at%20the%20University%20of%20ChicagoLinks to an external site. .
· Discussion Questions
· Provide 4 discussion questions for students to answer based on the case.
· Discussion questions must include connections to ethics/compliance, regulations, principles, or policy.
· References:
· Create a preliminary bibliography (use APA 7th) using library and internet sources.
· This is your initial search for the case. It should contain at least ten sources. (journal articles, trade journals, periodicals, newspapers, court cases, etc.) At least three journal articles must be included and the journal titles must be one from Cabells: https://www2-cabells-com.jpllnet.sfsu.edu/journalyticsLinks to an external site. .
Style Guidelines (Midterm Case Proposal + Final Case Project)
· Use the following style guidelines to complete the midterm case proposal and final case project: Times New Roman font, size 12 point, 1-inch margins and single-spaced.
· Synthesize all the sources throughout your paper. Paraphrasing is most often used to blend the ideas of another writer’s text with the prose style of our own work. Do not use bullet points for the case proposal and final case project, and make sure to write in complete sentences. Turnitin and AI Generative Tools on the syllabus will be applied.
· The Midterm Case Proposal must be a minimum of 3.5 pages with single spacing. The Final Case Project must be a minimum of 7.5 pages with single spacing Paragraphs are usually about 150-200 words long.
· The Midterm Case Proposal and the Final Case Project must be provided in Microsoft Word. Do not submit your paper in Google Docs, PDF, or PAGES.
· Write in the third person, in the past tense, and establish an objectivity of core dilemmas in the case.