CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
jaydensonPLEASE READ ALL ATTACHED
4 months ago
10
files (3)Week2PATHOCaseStudyPrompt.docx
WK2PATHOCASESTUDYANALYSIS.docx
WK2PATHOASSIGN.docx
Week2PATHOCaseStudyPrompt.docx
Week 2 Case Study Prompt A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports: • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour) • Photosensitivity • Facial rash that worsens with sun exposure • Hair thinning • Bilateral ankle swelling No recent infection. No new medications. Physical Examination • BP: 148/92 mmHg • Temp: 99.4°F • Erythematous malar rash sparing nasolabial folds • Tender MCP and PIP joints bilaterally • Mild bilateral ankle edema Laboratory Data Test Result Hgb 9.8 g/dL WBC 3,000/mm³ Platelets 110,000/mm³ Creatinine 1.6 mg/dL Urinalysis 2+ protein, RBC casts ESR 65 mm/hr ANA Positive (1:640) Anti-dsDNA Elevated Anti-Smith Positive Complement C3/C4 Decreased Questions: 1. Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. 2. What role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease? 3. What is the impact of the disease on the immune system? How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease
This topic is closed for comments.
WK2PATHOCASESTUDYANALYSIS.docx
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.
Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.
An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.
In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. In 1-2 pages, you will answer the questions provided following the case scenario. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. Follow the grading rubric.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
The Assignment
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis by answering the questions provided following the case scenario.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 2
Submit your Case Study Analysis Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site. ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
image1.jpeg
WK2PATHOASSIGN.docx
NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient signs and symptoms presented in the case study; discussing the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. |
30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. ... The response is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. 27 to >24.0 ptsGoodThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis. ... The response supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation. 24 to >22.0 ptsFairThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. ... The response is supported with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research. 22 to >0 ptsPoorThe response discusses the primary cellular pathophysiological processes, and the significance for symptom development and diagnosis in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. ... The response does not include rationales, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat role do genetic mutations play in the development of the disease? |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease. 17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is the impact of the disease on the immune system? ...... How do treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease? |
30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the impact of the disease on the immune system. Response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how treatment strategies target the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. 27 to >24.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. 24 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. 17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of the impact of disease on the immune system. |
30 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. ... Content is supported by current evidence-based sources. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. ... Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. ... Some content is supported by current evidence-based sources. 2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ... No content is supported by current evidence-based source. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
5 pts |
Total Points: 100
