Business Finance - Management Assignment 1
2 years ago
50
Narrations.docx
Assignment1.docx
Narrations.docx
MBA 6615 Assignment 1- Leadership Styles
Narration 1
Two brothers, Albert and Harry Stiles founded A&HB Company, a decade ago with a mission to source, manufacture, and sell fair trade premium chocolate confectionary products. Albert and Harry are environmentalists who personally witnessed the damage to the environment, communities, and society from sourcing cocoa from modern large-scale cocoa plantations. The brothers believed that there was a market niche for premium chocolate products sourced from mid to small-sized farms that valued the well-being of the environment, the economic development of workers, and their communities.
Both Albert and Harry are passionate about their mission and the quality of their products. Harry is the anthropologist who oversees the supply chain for cocoa, living and traveling amongst the various communities that farm the cocoa. Albert is the CEO of A&HB Company overseeing the manufacturing, marketing, and sales of their premium brands.
Albert is exacting in his approach to work, with himself and his employees. He insists that the company operate based on the principles of integrity, honesty, and hard work. Albert set personal and operational quality standards and is diligent about assessing how the company measured up to those standards. He often stated that the principles he stood for applied to himself as much as to any other.
Here are some observations from one of his employees:
“My boss is a model of the Puritan work ethic. He is a true professional with boundless energy. He seeks excellence and is eager to listen to ideas and initiatives that further the growth of the business and its mission. He seems to be in all places and knows everyone and almost all the workings of the business.
He can be annoyed when people don’t deliver to his level of expectations. He has little patience for middling to low performance. Sometimes when he is unhappy about the work he tries to do the job himself. Often his work is not satisfactory but that is a way of expressing his frustration. I appreciate who he is, but I don’t want to be like him.
I see that he is more at ease and open with those who share his approach to work. Sometimes he can be stubborn about his opinions, even when presented with evidence to the contrary. For example, in the early years, the company produced chocolate bars and candy without any extraneous flavors or nuts. Even though the company was growing the marketing team explained that we needed flavored products like chocolate with orange or mint and nuts. Mr. Albert was stubborn and would not agree. Maybe he was just being emotional and opinionated. Only much later did he relent products and we experienced a much-needed bounce in our business.
Now. Mr. Albert seems to be more open to various ideas about products and marketing. He listens more to his team but still requires detailed answers to questions before he can be convinced.
Narration 2
RJK is a retail company that owns department stores in shopping malls across the country. RJK is doing poorly facing declining sales, profitability, and cash. The board of directors of the company decided to replace the current CEO, bringing in an experienced leader in the retailing industry. Ms. Bailey, the new CEO, has broader knowledge and experience in retailing and was eager to take on the challenges at RJK.
Ms. Bailey met with her team and visited the larger stores. She expressed shock at the conditions at stores. She declared the store design as “old fashioned” and the merchandise as “out of touch”. Her senior team disagreed with some of Ms. Bailey’s assessments. They pointed out that their stable customers were demographically older and preferred lower-priced brand merchandise. They agreed that updates were necessary, both to the store layout and merchandising, but advised Ms. Bailey against a “total revamp of the store”. Ms. Bailey expressed no confidence in her senior team. She devalued their concerns. She mocked them for holding on to past ideas and challenged them to “embrace the modern age of retailing”.
She brought in an outside team of retailing experts, who ignored RJK senior management ideas and concerns. The new team worked closely with Ms. Bailey to redesign the store and improve merchandising. A new marketing campaign was launched and promoted the stores’ upgrades. Ms. Bailey burned through RJK’s cash and took on new debt to pay for the upgrades.
After a few months, RJK observed positive signs of a turnaround in the business. Sales at redesigned stores were up, and their inventory was at more manageable levels, but profitability was down due to the ongoing costs of executing the turnaround. Debt levels continued to climb, business liquidity was low, and the company faced potential insolvency unless expenses and debt levels were decreased.
The governing board conferred with Ms. Bailey about the financial risks at the company. Ms. Bailey insisted that financial improvement would be forthcoming with the continued uptick in sales. She laid out aggressive and expensive plans for redesigning the majority of the stores and closing the remaining unprofitable stores. The Board was unconvinced of her plan and asked to slow down the pace of redesign.
Ms. Bailey failed to follow the Board’s directions. Her senior management team was in disarray because many left the company. The much-anticipated uptick in sales did occur but was insufficient to ease financial stress.
This is how one of the senior managers described Ms. Bailey and her leadership.
Narration 3
The Board of Directors of RJK met urgently over the deteriorating financial condition of the company. They debated whether Ms. Bailey had sufficiently followed their guidance. Several directors observed that under her leadership the company had failed to achieve sustainable recovery and an urgent change in leadership was needed to avert a deepening crisis. At the end of their debate, they decided to fire Ms. Bailey.
Mr. Jenkins, an experienced retailer in the beverage industry was appointed as the new CEO of RJK. Mr. Jenkins faced the challenge of stabilizing RJK's finances while charting a modest path for continued recovery.
These are some comments from employees about Mr. Jenkins six months into his tenure.
Employee 1: “The first thing that comes to my mind is that Mr. Jenkins is spending a huge amount of time discussing with us where the company stands, what it must achieve, and why that makes sense. After a meeting with him, we feel less isolated and believe that our ideas would be welcomed. He encourages people to ask questions. This transparency is refreshing and motivating.”
Employee 2: “Our company is in trouble. Difficult decisions on costs and employment must be made. We hear that workforce reductions of about 20% are likely. However, we have no idea how these decisions will be made and whether our managers will be part of the decision process. Mr. Jenkins seems like an open person. But I am not sure whether he can make the tough decisions that he must and still be viewed as a likable, motivating person.”
Employee 3: I think Mr. Jenkins is a nice person, but I am not sure that he is up to the job of stabilizing RFK. He is hesitant to deliver bad news to people, He is always upbeat, even when he answers questions on financial troubles at the company. I know that some of my colleagues think that he is too nice to make the tough decisions. And that he will surely delegate those tough decisions to a core team and he will merely rubber stamp them.”
Narration 4
These are some employee comments about Mr. Jenkins one and a year six months into his tenure.
Employee 1: “After nine months, Mr. Jenkins addressed all employees in a series of company-wide meetings. Mr. Jenkins told us that he learned a lot about the business from us and now he wants to make much-needed changes to the business. He showed us in charts and tables the state of the business and he asked us to support him in the changes that must be made. He created a table of the various sentiments the employees had expressed to him and many of the ideas they recommended for changing the business. I really liked that he took the time to learn about the business, especially by listening to us, and hearing how he felt and then taking the trouble to bring it all together so that we could all be on the same page.”
Employee 2: “ I was worried that he was taking a long time to learn about the business. I felt that the business problems were urgent and hoped that he would learn faster. Why wait to tell us after nine months? Perhaps, it is good to take the time to get to know us and the business before making difficult decisions.”
Employee 3: “At the company-wide meeting he told us his vision for the company and the plan for going forward. Then he dropped the big hatchet. He told us the number of employees the company must let go and that the reductions would be across all levels of the company. He also said that as the company’s financials were not in good shape the severance package would not be good as he would have liked. I was scared. I was not sure how management would decide who would stay and who would go. Even if I was not fired, I would not be happy if the cutbacks and the severance packages are not fair.”
Employee 4: “I want the cost reduction to happen quickly. I would be really uncomfortable if this process took too long. Hopefully, Mr. Jenkins understands that employee morale is not good now and that he should focus on ways to improve our morale and confidence. Many of those who remain with the business are going to be unhappy that their friends and colleagues are not here. There is going to be a lot of conflict. I really hope that senior management has a plan for dealing with this.”
Assignment1.docx
ASSIGNMENT I
ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP STYLES
This is a GROUP assignment.
Assignment
The attached document presents four narrations by employees of their respective bosses. Based on your learning, respond to the following questions on each of the four narrations.
1) Discuss the dimensions of the leadership attributes /skills and connect them to your learning of leadership style.
2) When you conclude that the style is more consistent with one particular style, explain the rationale supporting your conclusion. Additionally ferret out behaviors that do not easily fit into your selected dominant style.
3) Discuss the strengths of the leader in each case and his/her shortcomings. Explain your reasoning underlying your conclusions.
4) In your estimation how can each leader modify his/her leadership behaviors and skills to become more effective?
You must use the required resources on Canvas to form the analytical basis for this report. Review the grading rubric below.
Report Guidelines
1. Paper must be in APA style. Word count should not exceed 2,000 words.
2. Review the grading rubric below to ensure that you understand how your work will be assessed.
3. The paper must be based on your learning in the course. You must demonstrate your learning of the assigned Canvas resources. Draw from your assigned readings and utilize quality reference sources. In other words, don't just offer 'armchair theories' or 'off-the-cuff opinions' that cannot be supported by solid evidence from leadership literature.
4. You must include in-text citations and a WORK CITED page consistent with the APA style.
5. Do not violate Academic Integrity. Do not use Chat GPT for answers. Your work must be your effort.
Grading Rubric
|
Evaluation Dimensions |
Written Assignments |
||
|
|
Beginning 70% - 79% |
Competent 80% - 89% |
Accomplished 90% - 100% |
|
Identification of Issues 10% |
Does not recognize the problems or issues of the case or identifies problems and issues that are not based on facts of the case; displays little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic challenges; executive summary does not present a clear overview of the case issues; main points are not outlined or cannot be understood. |
With a few exceptions, identifies and outlines the principal problems and issues in the case; demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the company’s issues, current situation, and strategic challenges; executive summary provides an adequate overview of the case issues and problems; summary is missing a few minor points, but meets expectations. |
Presents accurate and detailed descriptions of the problems and issues central to the case; provides a well-focused diagnosis of strategic issues and key problems that demonstrates an excellent grasp of the company’s present situation and strategic challenges; descriptions are compelling and insightful; provides a thorough and effective executive summary. |
|
Stakeholder Perspectives 10% |
Does not identify or explain the perspectives of any stakeholders involved in the case, or explanation is flawed in many respects; fails to recognize any differences between the interests of the various stakeholders. |
With a few minor exceptions, adequately identifies and summarizes the perspectives of the principal stakeholders involved in the case; outlines some conflicts of interest between company stakeholders. |
Clearly and accurately describes the unique perspectives of multiple key stakeholders in the case; demonstrates insightful analysis of strategic tensions or conflicts of interest between the stakeholders. |
|
Connections to Theoretical and Empirical Research 20% |
Makes little or no connection between the issues and problems in the case and relevant theoretical and empirical research, or the connections identified are weak or inaccurate in many respects. |
Identifies and outlines connections between some of the issues and problems in the case and relevant theoretical and empirical research; the connections identified are adequately elucidated. |
Makes appropriate, insightful, and powerful connections between the issues and problems in the case and relevant theory and empirical data; effectively integrates multiple sources of knowledge with case information. |
|
Analysis and Evaluation 20% |
Simply repeats facts identified in the case and does not discuss the relevance of these facts; fails to draw conclusions, or conclusions are not justified or supported; does not present relevant research or data; shows no critical examination of case issues. |
Provides an acceptable analysis of most of the issues and problems in the case; in most instances, analysis is adequately supported by theory and empirical data; appropriate conclusions are outlined and summarized. |
Presents a balanced, in-depth, and critical assessment of the facts of the case in light of relevant empirical and theoretical research; develops insightful and well-supported conclusions using reasoned, sound, and informed judgments. |
|
Action Plans 20% |
Has difficulty identifying alternatives and appropriate courses of action; few if any alternatives are presented, infeasible actions are proposed, action plans are not supported, or actions do not address the key issues and problems in the case. |
Outlines and summarizes some alternative courses of action to deal with most of the issues and problems in the case; in most instances, proposed action plans are outlined, are feasible, and based on relatively sound theory and evidence. |
Effectively weighs and assesses a variety of alternative actions that address the multiple issues central to the case; proposes detailed plans of action; action plans are realistic and contain thorough and well-reasoned justifications. |
|
Evaluation of Consequences 20% |
Displays limited awareness and/or understanding of the consequences of action plans; fails to identify implications and consequences of proposed action plans; identified outcomes do not follow from proposed action plans, or outcomes are not related to issues in the case. |
Demonstrates acceptable analysis of the results of proposed action plans; adequately outlines and summarizes the implications and consequences resulting from alternative courses of action; with a few minor exceptions, identified consequences of action plans are related to key issues in the case. |
Objectively and critically reflects upon alternative plans of action; effectively identifies, thoroughly discusses, and insightfully evaluates the implications and consequences resulting from the proposed action plans; identified consequences are tied to the key issues central to the case. |
- For Professor Goodman Only
- PSY 425 Drug Treatment Options Paper
- response to students in forums
- Due in 24 hours - Original work please APA format worksheet attached
- True or False Finite Mathematics
- Literature week V
- hw5 acc
- Case Study 2: RIM / Blackberry and Recovering Your Business
- MGT 448 Week 1 Individual Assignment Globalization Questionnaire
- MGT 311 Week 4 Learning Team Reflection