Business Finance - Accounting Excel Spreadsheet Comparison Assignment
see word doc for assignment instructions
5 hours ago
35
ProjectTemplatesuppdata1.xlsx
ExcelProjectInstructions.docx
- ProjectRFMACStandardEntryDataforCoordinators-copyforFHS1.xlsx
- ProjectRFHSC-SponsorProjectTypeandSuppApproved1.xlsx
ProjectTemplatesuppdata1.xlsx
Sheet1
| TRUE | FALSE | TRUE | FALSE | TRUE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | TRUE | FALSE | TRUE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | FALSE | ||
| PCBU | Category | Sponsor Name | Reference Award Number | Fund Code | Faculty | Interest Bearing | MacBill | Return of Funds | Carryover Restric. | Budget Restriction | Award Amt Restric. | Matching project# | Risk (L/M/H) | T-A Application ID | GRF Eligible | T-A Guidelines | Auto 1YR Extension | Terminal End DT | Unique Guidelines | Currency | Exchange Rate | Foreign Amount | Project Type Name | Reporting | Notes: | RFMAC | ||
| PCBU | Sponsor Name | Fund Code | Faculty (Supplemental Data) | Per Diem | MACBILL | Return of Fund Requirement | Carry Over Restriction | Budget Category Restriction | Award Amt Restriction | Matching Project# | Risk (L/M/H) | T-A Application ID | GRF Eligible | T-A Guidelines | Auto 1YR Extension | Formated Terminal End Date | Unique Guidelines | Project Type Name | Notes | RFHSC | Date Reviewed | Initial of Reviewer |
ExcelProjectInstructions.docx
Excel Project: RFMAC & RFHSC Data Review and Standardization
Project Objective
The purpose of this project is to compare how RFMAC and RFHSC enter and organize their data, identify similarities and differences between the two datasets, and create one standardized Excel template that can be used for future reporting and analysis.
You will review both files, map corresponding fields, standardize the column headers, identify any differences in fund codes, and combine the data into one consistent Excel table that can be used to create PivotTables. You can also create a PivotTable itself.
Part 1: Review and Compare the RFMAC and RFHSC Data
RFHSC
1. Review Columns B through R in the RFHSC file.
2. Review the data by Sponsor Name to determine how information is entered for each sponsor.
3. Identify:
· Fields that are the same or similar to RFMAC.
· Fields that are different.
· Fields that RFHSC has that RFMAC does not have.
· Fields that RFMAC has that RFHSC does not have.
4. Pay particular attention to any fields highlighted in red in the template attached and document what makes these fields different or significant.
RFMAC
1. Review the RFMAC data and compare its fields and data-entry practices with RFHSC.
2. Do not remove any RFMAC fields that are not available in RFHSC. These fields must remain in the final template.
3. Compare the fund codes used by RFMAC and RFHSC.
Fund Code Mapping
The following fund codes are considered equivalent:
|
RFMAC |
RFHSC |
|
Fund 50 |
Fund 80 |
|
Fund 55 |
Fund 85 |
Important: Make note of any fund code that does not match or does not have an identified equivalent between the two systems.
Part 2: Standardize the Column Headers
Use the provided template as the starting point for the standardized dataset.
1. Include all fields
Bring every column header from both the RFMAC and RFHSC files into the template.
Do not delete a field simply because it only exists in one of the two files.
The final template must contain all required fields from both datasets.
2. Use RFMAC as the standard column order
The RFMAC column order must remain unchanged.
Do not rearrange the RFMAC columns.
Instead, rearrange the RFHSC columns so that they follow the same order as the RFMAC columns.
For example:
RFMAC:
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
Sponsor Name |
Fund |
Date |
Amount |
If RFHSC is organized as:
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
Amount |
Sponsor Name |
Date |
Fund |
Rearrange the RFHSC columns to:
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
Sponsor Name |
Fund |
Date |
Amount |
3. Standardize similar headers
If an RFHSC header represents the same type of information as an RFMAC header, change the RFHSC header so that it matches the RFMAC header exactly.
Example:
· RFHSC: Return of Fund Requirement
· RFMAC: Return of Fund
If these fields contain the same type of information, change the RFHSC header to:
Return of Fund
The goal is for equivalent fields to have identical column headers in the final template.
4. Handle fields without a duplicate
If a field exists in only one dataset and does not have a corresponding field in the other dataset, keep the field.
Move any unique/non-duplicate fields to the end of the columns in the final template.
For example:
|
Sponsor Name |
Fund |
Date |
Amount |
RFMAC-Only Field |
RFHSC-Only Field |
Do not delete unique fields.
Part 3: Verify the Column Headers
Use the Excel =EXACT formula to verify that corresponding column headers match exactly.
For example:
=EXACT(A2,B2)
The formula will return:
· TRUE = the two headers are exactly the same.
· FALSE = the headers are different.
Use this to check that the standardized headers have been correctly matched.
Before moving on, ensure that all corresponding RFMAC and RFHSC fields use the same header name and wording.
Part 4: Transfer the Data into the Template
Once you have completed the column mapping and standardized the headers:
1. Use the finalized template as the master spreadsheet.
2. Copy all data from the RFMAC file into the appropriate columns.
3. Copy all data from the RFHSC file into the corresponding columns.
4. Ensure that the RFHSC data follows the RFMAC column order.
5. If a field does not exist in one dataset, leave that field blank for those records.
6. Apply the identified fund-code mappings where appropriate:
· RFMAC Fund 50 ↔ RFHSC Fund 80
· RFMAC Fund 55 ↔ RFHSC Fund 85
7. Ensure that no records or fields are accidentally omitted during the transfer.
Part 5: Create the Final Excel Table
Once all RFMAC and RFHSC data has been combined:
1. Select the complete dataset.
2. Convert the dataset into an Excel Table.
3. Ensure that:
· Every column has a clear header.
· There are no blank column headers.
· The column structure is consistent.
· Data is entered in the correct columns.
· There are no unnecessary blank rows or columns within the dataset.
4. The table should be structured so that Sonya can create a PivotTable directly from it for quick reporting and analysis.
The final table should allow for reporting such as:
· Data by Sponsor Name
· Data by Fund
· Comparison of RFMAC and RFHSC records
· Totals by fund
· Identification of unmatched or unique fund codes
· Other relevant summaries that can be generated through a PivotTable
Final Deliverable
Your completed Excel workbook should include:
1. Data/Column Analysis
A record of the similarities and differences identified between RFMAC and RFHSC, including any important differences in data entry.
2. Standardized Template
A new template containing all required columns from both files, using RFMAC's column order as the standard.
3. Combined Dataset
All data from the RFMAC and RFHSC files entered into the standardized template.
4. Fund Code Mapping
Documentation of:
· RFMAC Fund 50 = RFHSC Fund 80
· RFMAC Fund 55 = RFHSC Fund 85
· Any additional fund codes that do not have a matching equivalent.
5. Excel Table
A clean, standardized Excel Table that can be used directly by me to create PivotTables and perform reporting.
Overall Goal
By the end of this project, someone should be able to look at the final spreadsheet and not need to know whether a record originally came from RFMAC or RFHSC to understand the data structure. Equivalent information should use consistent headers, the columns should follow a consistent order, and the entire dataset should be ready for reporting.
Please explain in detail all the work you did as well as what your final analysis is between how RFMAC and RFHSC enters their data.