BUS 311 week 2 DQ 1

Ashford 3: - Week 2 - Discussion 1

Elements of a Contract

  Read the Case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz in the text. Answer the following   questions:
 

  1.    What were the terms of the contract between Campbell and   the Wentzes?
  2.    Did the Wentzes perform under the contract?
  3.    Did the court find specific performance to be an   adequate legal remedy in this case?
  4.    Why did the court refuse to help Campbell in enforcing   its legal contract?
  5.    How could Campbell change its contract in the future so   as to avoid the unconsionability problem?
 

  Guided Response: Review your peer’s responses. Respond to at least two of   your classmates’ letting them know if you agree with their analysis. Legal   analysis is fact driven. If your analysis of the facts is different from a   peer’s response, list the facts that led you to your conclusion. Did your   peer give more weight to facts that you found unimportant?