Britain Should Remain in the EU

 INTRODUCTION  

• Your      paper should be sufficient in length to respond to the questions posed by      your instructor (not including title and reference pages).
• Your      paper should be double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, in-text citations, and      references for all sources following proper APA formatting.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION Britain recently voted to leave the European Union (EU). The EU was created, in part, to better enable participating countries to participate and prosper in the global marketplace. What would make the British citizens decide to leave the EU? PROMPT You will be working in a group of two or three students, as assigned by the instructor, to critically analyze the political and economic factors that influenced the British to vote to leave the EU and identify three reasons why the vote to leave the EU was or was not the best decision. Your instructor will divide the groups into “pro-exit” and “remain in EU.” Each student in the group should develop three reasons, supported by scholarly research, to defend your group’s assigned position on whether the decision to leave the EU was a good one or a bad one. Tasks:  

1. Individually,      you will compose three main talking points for your position on whether      the decision to leave was a good decision or a bad decision. Your job is      to develop three reasons, supported by scholarly research, to defend your      assigned position on whether the EU should have left or stayed. Once you      have developed your three points, you will post them to the Group      Assignment Page. This will be done no later than Wednesday.
2. By Thursday you will upload to the Group Assignment Page, a MS Word document      with your peer’s three points and your critical responses (to each of the      three points). Your response should utilize scholarly-level research and      critical analysis to explain to your peer, tactfully, why their three main      talking points are flawed.