Biology
attached below
2 years ago
30
Instruction1.docx
HomeLabReportBIO100AEXAMPLE20191.docx
Midtermlabdatasheet1.xlsx
- bio-100a-final-lab-report-with-pictures.pdf
Instruction1.docx
Instructions
1. Please use the data collected during the experiment to write the midterm lab report. See detailed instructions below.
2. See attached the excel data sheet you can use for calculations- please download and enter your numbers in the appropriate spaces. You can use the same file to make your graphs. If you don't have Excel you can open it in other applications, such as Google spreadsheets.
3. Please check out the attached example lab report.
4. Submit the assignment.
5. Please note that the reports receive a Turnitin plagiarism report. Any significant matching score (>30-40%) will draw scrutiny, and high (>80%) matching will be considered plagiarized and receive a score of zero.
Detailed Report Instructions
· Minimum length of 3 pages of text, double-spaced, not including pictures and figures. 20 points.
· Lab Report must include the following sections (separated by bold headers corresponding to those below). 5 points.
· Introduction: 2-3 paragraphs introducing the biological concepts covered in the lab, including references to sources. The last paragraph of the introduction should contain 2-3 sentences introducing the lab design. 40 points.
· Methods: 2-3 paragraphs detailing the methods that you used to perform the lab. Do not cut and copy these from the lab manual. Write these in sentence form and do not use numbers or bullet-pointed lists. Include every detail you performed so that the reader would be able to perform the lab exactly as you did if they were trying to repeat it. Include pictures/diagrams where necessary. 40 points.
· Results: 2-3 paragraphs summarizing the results of the experiment. Use the Lab manual as a guide for the type of information to include here. Create figures (bar plots, scatterplots, etc) in Microsoft Excel, Google sheets or similar software from the completed tables from the Lab manual. Do not insert the tables from the Lab manual into the document, as I expect further synthesis of these results. Insert pictures of the completed experiment. 40 points.
· Discussion & Conclusion: 2-3 paragraphs discussing the results of the experiment, what the results mean, and how they relate to the biological concept under study. Reference outside sources where appropriate. Discuss 2-3 errors while avoiding the term human error. (Random Error and Systematic Error) Include a paragraph on your experience and impressions of the lab and what you learned. 40 points.
· References: Include APA properly formatted references and in-text citations. A minimum of three sources are required. (See Purdue OWL). 15 points.
HomeLabReportBIO100AEXAMPLE20191.docx
BIO100A Midterm/Final Report example
<Note: This report is based on a technique that you will not do in the class. You can watch it on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XV9FOWleErA (5 minutes). In the experiment, we will be comparing 3 groups of leaf disks: exposed to direct sunlight, exposed to sunlight behind a window, and away from the window.>
Introduction
The purpose of the lab is to observe and become more familiar with photosynthesis. We will be comparing the effect of light intensity on photosynthesis using spinach leaf disks. Photosynthesis is a process by which plants and other producers are able to convert solar energy to chemical energy, and build up organic molecules such as glucose using CO2 from the air as source of carbon (Phelan, 2015). In addition, photosynthesis also releases oxygen as a byproduct, which is used by all aerobic organisms. In this experiment we will be using spinach leaves to explore the effect of more or less sunlight on photosynthesis (Steucek et al, 1985). Small disks from the spinach leaves cut using a hole puncher will be first depleted from oxygen, which will make them sink, then placed in water with sodium bicarbonate (Na2HCO3) at different locations. Bicarbonate is used as carbon source leaves will not be in touch with air when the experiment starts. As photosynthesis takes place, using the sunlight as source of energy and the bicarbonate as source of carbon (CO2), the leaves produce oxygen, which makes them float. We will be measuring the time that it takes for half (50%) of the disks to float. As photosynthesis depends on sunlight, it is my hypothesis that it will take longer to float when the leaves are not exposed to direct sunlight. I also believe that the leaves in direct sunlight will float faster compared to the ones behind the windowsill, as glass absorbs UV light.
Methods
The experiment took place in-house, between 11 am and 1 pm. The temperature in the sun (outside and behind the window) was 75 oF, while inside the room in the shade it was 71 oC. We placed spinach leaf disks in 3 syringes, soaked them with a bicarbonate solution, and eliminated the air contained in them. Once the syringes were set up I placed them in 3 different locations: on a windowsill exposed to direct sunlight, behind the same window on a table, and inside another room, away from windows. The actual experiment started at noon, and the sunshine was bright and steady (no clouds). The photosynthetic process was monitored by observing the disks starting to float, due to production of oxygen. Time necessary to have half of the disks (5 of 10) floating above the 5 ml mark on the syringe was recorded.
Results
After preparing the experiment as described in the Methods section, we compared the time that took for each group to have half of the leaf disks floating. It was shorter for the leaves in direct sunlight and the group behind the window, and longer for the leaves away from the window. Figure 1 shows the comparison of the time needed for 50% of the disks to float. While there was virtually no difference in the time needed for the samples exposed to sunlight (outside vs behind the window, 25 and 26 minutes, respectively), the leaves not exposed to sunlight, in the living room, required a longer time (35 minutes).
Figure 1. Time needed for 50% leaves to float.
(Below is the original table, which is not required for the report).
|
Group |
Location |
Number of spinach leaf disks |
Time for 50% disks to float (min) |
|
1 |
On windowsill outside |
10 |
25 |
|
2 |
Behind the window |
10 |
26 |
|
3 |
Living room |
10 |
35 |
Discussion & Conclusion
In our experiment, it was clear the design worked as the leaves, depleted from oxygen, slowly started to float due to the production of oxygen. I expected the leaves inside the room and away from the window to take longer time to float, which was my result. This is due to less exposure to sunlight, which means less excitation of chlorophyll and less harvesting of energy. However, I expected the time for the group of leaves in the sunlight outside to be much shorter than the ones behind the window, as the window filters the UV light. After re-reading the introduction I realized that chlorophyll excitation happens mainly in the visible spectrum, so the results seem correct.
In summary, in this experiment I compared the effect of 3 different light conditions on the photosynthetic process using spinach leaf disks.
The setup of the experiment seemed simple enough, but it took a long time to prepare and place all the disks in the syringes, as well as removing the air from the leaves to make them sink (approximately one hour).
My hypothesis was that the shortest time would be for the leaves in the direct sunlight, followed by those behind the window, and the longest time for the leaves inside the room. However, the time for the leaves outside and behind the window was very similar. This can be explained by the fact that chlorophyll excitation occurs mainly by visible light, and minimally by UV light, which is blocked by the glass. On the other hand, my prediction that leaves inside the room would have the slowest photosynthesis was correct.
While this experiment may seem very simple and removed from real life, the truth is that life on Earth depends on photosynthesis, which in turn depends on access to sunlight. It is hypothesized that the impact of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs millions of years ago caused an “asteroid winter” due to the large number of dust and particles entering the atmosphere and blocking sunlight (Vellekoop et al, 2014). Similar catastrophic situations could take place in case of atomic bomb explosions (Robock et al, 2007).
In conclusion, I was able to observe photosynthesis in real time, and confirm that solar energy (and particularly visible light) is needed for the process, as shown by the fact that the leaves inside the room (away from the light) had the slowest photosynthesis.
References
Phelan, Jay. What Is Life?: a Guide to Biology. W.H. Freeman & Company, 2015.
Robock, A., L. Oman, and G. L. Stenchikov (2007), Nuclear winter revisited with a modern climate model and current nuclear arsenals: Still catastrophic consequences, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13107, doi:10.1029/2006JD008235.
Steucek, Guy L., Robert J. Hill, and Class/Summer 1982. 1985. “Photosynthesis I: An Assay Utilizing Leaf Disks.” The American Biology Teacher, 47(2): 96–99.
Vellekoop, J.; Sluijs, A.; Smit, J.; Stefan Schouten, S.; Weijers, J.W.H.; Jaap S.; Damsté, S. and Brinkhuis, H. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2014, 111 (21) 7537-7541; DOI:10.1073/pnas.1319253111
Time needed for 50% spinach leaves to float
On windowsill Behind the window Living room 1 2 3 25.0 26.0 35.0
Time (minutes)
1
Midtermlabdatasheet1.xlsx
Instructions
| This excel sheet contains the tables from the midterm lab manual, but with the formulas included, so as soon as you populate the numbers in the tables you will get the calculations. Cells were your numbers are to be input are highlighted in blue. It is recommended that you save the template first in case you need to go back and redo the calculations |
Table mid.1
| Bottle | Sugar (tsp) | Yeast amount (tsp) | Water amount (cup) | Yeast solution height (cm) | Temperature | |
| 1 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.25 | Room Temp | ||
| 2 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.25 | Water bath | ||
| 3 | 1.00 | 2 | 0.25 | Water bath | ||
| 4 | 0.33 | 2 | 0.25 | Water bath | ||
| 5 | 0.00 | 2 | 0.25 | Water bath | ||
| 6 | Please write your alternative experiment | 2 | 0.25 | |||
| Average yeast height | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
Table mid.2
| Options | Ballon sizes | Yeast growth | ||||||
| Select from dropdown menu | L | H | ||||||
| Bottle | Balloon size | Yeast growth | M | M | ||||
| 1 | S | L | ||||||
| 2 | N | N | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 |
Table mid.3
| Bottle | Circumference (cm) | Average (cm) | ∆ | Half circumference (cm) | Average (cm) | ∆ | Radius (cm) | New yeast height (cm) | Average (cm) | ∆ | |
| 1 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| 2 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| 3 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| 4 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| 5 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
| 6 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||||
Table mid.4
| Bottle | Independent variable | New yeast height | Yeast growth (cm) | C (cm) | R (cm) | Balloon volume (cm3) |
| 1 | Room temperature | copy the values from table 3.3 | substract the value from table 3.1 | copy from table 3.3 | copy from table 3.3 | ERROR:#VALUE! |
| 2 | Control 1 | 0 | ||||
| 3 | Control 2 | 0 | ||||
| 4 | 1/3 tsp sugar | 0 | ||||
| 5 | Negative control (no sugar) | 0 | ||||
| 6 | 0 |
- help
- Unit II Reflection Paper history
- English
- ACC 574 Week 6 Assignment 3 - PWC Audit Scandal and Fraud
- Acc
- Assignment Information Due Date Sunday, August 6, 2017 11:59 PM Points Possible 100 View Rubric Using scholarly material, explain how Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems mitigate risk and assist in organizational decision making. In addition, ex
- HCS 451 Week 3 Discussion- The Improvement Guide-A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance (2nd ed.), Ch. 14
- Persuasive Action Outline
- Business Strategy for ‘Nectar Foods’*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial*****Use as Guide Paper*****
- 20$. ONLY LITERATURE BACKGROUNDS WILL GET REPLIES. 5 Days (or earlier) for 800 words in total. 4 different readings and 4 SEPARATE repors