Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
a month ago
25
casestudy2.docx
casestudy2.docx
Advanced Primary Care of Family I-HBN-HY01 Luis Serrano
🩺 CASE STUDY 2 - Chest Pain and Dyspnea: Diagnostic Reasoning in Primary Care 5 pages
CASE STUDY 2 - Chest Pain and Dyspnea: Diagnostic Reasoning in Primary Care
Case Scenario
Ms. L.T. is a 61-year-old female presenting with intermittent chest tightness and exertional dyspnea for 3 weeks.
History:
· PMH: Hypertension, tobacco use (30 pack-years), anxiety
· Medications: Amlodipine 5 mg daily
· Symptoms: Chest discomfort radiating to jaw, relieved by rest
Vitals:
· BP: 156/88 mmHg
· HR: 96 bpm
Initial Findings:
· EKG: Nonspecific ST-T changes
· SpO₂: 95% on room air
Student Assignment Requirements
1. Pathophysiology (25%)
· Compare and contrast ischemic vs non-ischemic chest pain mechanisms
· Explain cardiopulmonary causes of dyspnea
· Address anxiety overlap
2. Assessment & Differential Diagnosis (35%)
· Focused cardiac and pulmonary exam
· Prioritized differential diagnosis
· Identification of life-threatening conditions
· Decision-making for ED referral vs outpatient management
3. Pharmacology & Initial Management (30%)
· Acute and chronic pharmacologic considerations
· Antihypertensive optimization
· Risk reduction strategies
· Follow-up testing and referrals
4. APA & Evidence Integration (10%)
RUBRIC – CASE STUDY 2 - Chest Pain and Dyspnea Diagnostic Reasoning (100 Points)
1. Pathophysiology of Symptoms (25 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (23–25) |
Clearly differentiates ischemic and non-ischemic mechanisms of chest pain and dyspnea, accurately linking physiology to patient presentation. |
|
Satisfactory (18–22) |
Correct explanation of major mechanisms with limited depth or integration. |
|
Unsatisfactory (13–17) |
Partial or unclear explanation of pathophysiology. |
|
Poor (1–12) |
Incorrect or superficial explanation of mechanisms. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
2. Assessment & Differential Diagnosis (35 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (33–35) |
Thorough, prioritized differential diagnosis with clear identification of life-threatening conditions and appropriate disposition decisions. |
|
Satisfactory (26–32) |
Appropriate differential but limited prioritization or incomplete reasoning. |
|
Unsatisfactory (18–25) |
Incomplete or poorly prioritized differential diagnosis. |
|
Poor (1–17) |
Unsafe or inaccurate diagnostic reasoning. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
3. Pharmacology & Initial Management Plan (30 points)
|
Level |
Description |
|
Excellent (28–30) |
Evidence-based management addressing acute and chronic needs with clear rationale and follow-up. |
|
Satisfactory (22–27) |
Management plan is appropriate but lacks detail or optimization. |
|
Unsatisfactory (16–21) |
Partial or unsupported management decisions. |
|
Poor (1–15) |
Unsafe or inappropriate treatment plan. |
|
Not Submitted (0) |
Section not submitted or missing. |
- animal populations, biologists count the total number of animals in a small section of
- qrb 501 bus math wk6 qu-4
- "A" WORK ONLY
- CRJ 200: Criminal Procedure and Criminal Evidence
- complete my paper
- FOR ESSAYS GURU ONLY
- For Prof. Dan only
- Unit I Article Review (For Zeek the Geek Only) Managing Project Teams
- Manufacturing Budget Analysis
- "Disaster Response and Recovery"