Assigment .apa seven . all instructions attached.

Attemptfeedback.docx

Attempt feedback

Strengths (What Was Met)

You clearly identified food insecurity as a significant public health issue and supported your introduction with global, national, and local data, including Miami-Dade-specific statistics. This strongly meets expectations for establishing the significance and relevance of the problem.

You defined a specific vulnerable population (low-income adults and immigrant Hispanic/Latino populations in Miami-Dade County) and provided a strong discussion of multiple risk factors, including socioeconomic barriers, food deserts, language barriers, and cultural influences. These were supported with scholarly evidence.

You included measurable outcomes (e.g., increased engagement and improved fruit and vegetable consumption within six months), demonstrating alignment with expectations for program evaluation.

The literature review includes scholarly sources and provides strengths and limitations of the studies. You also demonstrated basic synthesis, identifying common themes such as the importance of community-based and culturally tailored interventions.

The Health Belief Model (HBM) is appropriately selected and clearly explained. You also made meaningful connections between HBM constructs (e.g., perceived barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action) and your proposed intervention.

References are credible, scholarly, and aligned with in-text citations, meeting general graduate-level expectations.

Not Met / Requires Full Development for Week 8 Final Submission

The health promotion program is not fully operationalized. While general strategies (mobile food pantry, education, culturally sensitive interventions) are identified, the proposal lacks:

Clear description of specific program components and activities

Details on implementation (who delivers the program, where, frequency, structure)

Clear program flow and organization

For Week 8, the intervention must be fully detailed and actionable.

The measurable outcomes require further development:

Outcomes such as “20% growth in engagement” and “improvement in fruit and vegetable consumption” are vague

There is no clear explanation of how these outcomes will be measured (tools, frequency, baseline vs. follow-up)

Outcomes must be rewritten in full SMART format with clear evaluation methods

The introduction, while strong, could be enhanced by more explicitly linking the problem to the specific vulnerable population earlier in the section to strengthen focus and flow.

The vulnerable population section, although well-developed, has some claims that are not consistently supported with citations. Additional scholarly evidence is needed to support all key risk factors.

The literature review does not fully meet structural expectations:

The assignment requires clear, separate paragraphs per article

Followed by a distinct 2–3 paragraph evaluation section

While content is present, the structure should be more clearly organized to align with assignment instructions.

The evaluation of literature is underdeveloped:

Limited comparison across studies

Minimal identification of gaps in the literature

Limited connection between evidence and your proposed intervention design

This section needs stronger graduate-level analysis and synthesis.

There are APA and scholarly writing concerns:

Grammatical and sentence structure issues affecting clarity

Inconsistencies in reference formatting

Writing should be refined for conciseness and academic tone

Additionally, one foundational reference (Rosenstock, 1974) is cited but not included in the reference list, indicating a reference mismatch that must be corrected.

Reference Cross-Check & Credibility

Most in-text citations (e.g., FAO, Rabbitt et al., Treloar et al., Jia et al., Payán et al., Nasser Sharareh et al., Young et al.) are present in the reference list, demonstrating general alignment.

However:

Rosenstock (1974) is cited in-text but missing from the reference list ❗

Some sources are slightly older but still acceptable; however, ensure continued emphasis on current (≤5 years) evidence

HealthPromotionProposal_Part1copy.docx

2

Food Insecurity and Nutrition Access

Health Problem

Food insecurity, which can be considered as the inability to have access to adequate, safe, and healthy food consistently, is one of the serious governmental health challenges that impacts the physical and psychological health of the population at the global, national, and local levels. Food insecurity in populations increases malnutrition, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mental health problems because of using foods that are of low quality and cheap (FAO, 2024). On a global scale, the Food and Agriculture Organization (2024) claims that in 2022, about 735 million people, or 9.2 percent of the global population, faced hunger, which proves that food insecurity remains at the same level as before the pandemic. On a national scale, the United States in 2022 reported more than 17 million food insecure households, which is 12.8 percent of households compared to 10.2 percent in 2021 (Rabbitt et al., 2024). On the local level, Miami-Dade County is no exception, as 13.7 percent of its residents have food insecurity, and Hispanic and Latino groups are disproportionately impacted at 16 percent (Treloar et al., 2024). The health promotion initiative that will be proposed will be aimed at enhancing access to healthy foods by providing community-based nutrition education, a mobile food pantry, and culturally sensitive interventions. The desired results incorporate the quantifiable changes, like the 20 percent growth in engagement in community-based nutrition initiatives and improvement in the consumption of fruits and vegetables by the subjects in six months.

Vulnerable Population

The main vulnerable group of this health promotion program is the low-income adult population and immigrant families living in Miami-Dade County, especially Hispanics and Latinos. These groups are at risk because of socioeconomic factors like poverty, lack of employment opportunities, and high cost of housing, which further worsen the issue of food insecurity (Nasser Sharareh et al., 2023). Vulnerability is further increased by geographical factors, such as residing in a neighborhood considered to be a food desert with reduced access to fresh produce that is affordable. The populations of such locations frequently use convenience stores or fast-food joints where the choices are high in energy and low in nutrients, which puts them at risk of chronic illnesses linked to inadequate nutrition (Young et al., 2023).

Other risk factors are language barriers, a lack of awareness regarding food assistance programs available, and cultural conditions affecting dietary habits. Linguistic or documentation obstacles can also pose issues with navigating the public assistance systems, decreasing the capacity of the immigrant population to secure regular and healthy access to food (Payan et al., 2022). The cultural preferences of food can restrict the embrace of the conventional nutrition program unless interventions are culture-sensitive, which clarifies the necessity of personalized education plans.

Among this population, there are certain subgroups that have distinctive problems, such as recent immigrants or rural households. Specifically, rural Hispanic families tend to have less means of transportation which complicates the access issue and makes them even more reliant on low-cost, low-nutrition food (Payan et al., 2022). Similarly, financial instability and the lack of knowledge about the community food resources may affect recent immigrants, which leads to increased prevalence of food insecurity relative to more established populations (Nasser Sharareh et al., 2023). Being aware of these subgroup differences will enable the program to overcome particular obstacles and optimize its effectiveness.

Literature Review_Evidence-Based Interventions.

In a cross-sectional study, Jia et al. (2021) investigated food insecurity, dietary quality, and healthcare among lower-income adults. The intervention was aimed at raising the number of children enrolled in nutrition assistance programs and encouraging people to eat nutrient-dense foods via educational outreach and food vouchers. Findings showed a major change in the quality of food eaten, especially the increase in the consumption of fruits and vegetables, and the reduction in the use of emergency health facilities. The strengths of the study are that it uses quantifiable dietary outcomes and a large representative sample of low-income adults. The limitations of the cross-sectional design include the impossibility of causal inference and reporting bias in the assessment of dietary intake. The results, however, give evidence on nutrition-based interventions as effective measures to overcome health disparities due to food insecurity.

Treloar et al. (2024) proposed a longitudinal study aimed at determining the food insecurity rates and food assistance program participation among Hispanic and Latino residents of Hialeah, Florida, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The intervention involved culturally sensitive nutrition education classes and food distribution events in the communities. Results showed that the involvement in these programs enhanced the access to healthy diets, the knowledge of healthy eating habits, and the food insecure conditions among the participants. The strengths of this research are the longitudinal type, which made it possible to track the changes over time, and the use of the culturally relevant method, which made the program more active. Limitations are possible self-selection bias since the people who signed up might have been more willing to change their nutrition than those who did not. The paper highlights the significance of culturally and linguistically adapted interventions for vulnerable groups of immigrants.

The synthesis of these studies suggests general themes of effective interventions. They both emphasize the importance of community-based initiatives, the inclusion of nutrition education, and effective support systems in the form of food vouchers or food pantries. There are still gaps in terms of long-term sustainability and approaches to reaching the population with the most significant barriers to access, such as transportation or legal documentation restrictions. The inclusion of evidence-based research would ensure a comprehensive program design that takes care of immediate access to food and the ultimate change in nutritional behavior.

Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Model.

This proposed health promotion program will be guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM). HBM focuses on perceptions of individuals about susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, action cues, and self-efficacy to achieve health-related behavior changes (Rosenstock, 1974). The model is suitable for responding to the issue of food insecurity since it focuses on comprehending the individual perception of health risks associated with poor nutrition and encouraging behavior change by educating and providing resources. The HBM facilitates both educative and practical interventions by focusing on beliefs that change dietary and program participation.

Applying the HBM, the program will target perceived susceptibility and perceived severity by informing the participants about the health risks of poor nutrition, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The perceived benefits will be emphasized by showing how better dietary quality can help increase energy, well-being, and long-term health outcomes. Perceived barriers will be minimized through interventions such as the use of mobile food pantries, culturally sensitive food choices, and navigation endpoints. Hands-on cooking demonstrations and nutrition workshops will enhance self-efficacy, so that the participants will be able to make healthier choices. Action cues will encompass community activities, calls, and social media advertising to promote regular program attendance.

With the HBM, program design is structured and evidence-based to match measurable outcomes. The model offers the platform on which the effectiveness of education and access interventions can be tested by considering the difference in the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of the participants concerning nutrition. Moreover, its elements permit culturally proximate adaptation that is critical to the immigrant population that has a distinctive diet and barriers to access. The model promotes a systematic method to health promotion to ensure that the interventions are theoretically sound and practically effective.

References

FAO. (2024). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2024. In FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO; eBooks. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO; https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1254en

Jia, J., Fung, V., Meigs, J. B., & Thorndike, A. N. (2021). Food Insecurity, Dietary Quality, and Health Care Utilization in Lower-Income Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 121(11), 2177-2186.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.001

Nasser Sharareh, Seligman, H. K., Adesoba, T. P., Wallace, A. S., Hess, R., & Wilson, F. A. (2023). Food Insecurity Disparities Among Immigrants in the United States. AJPM Focus, 2(3), 100113–100113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2023.100113

Payán, D. D., Perez-Lua, F., Goldman-Mellor, S., & Young, M.-E. D. T. (2022). Rural Household Food Insecurity among Latino Immigrants during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nutrients, 14(13), 2772. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132772

Rabbitt, M. P., Reed-Jones, M., Hales, L. J., & Burke, M. P. (2024). Household food security in the United States in 2023. https://doi.org/10.32747/2024.8583175.ers

Treloar, D., Taylor, D. E., & Bell, A. (2024). Understanding Food Insecurity and Participation in Food Assistance Programs among Hispanic/Latino Residents of Hialeah, Florida, before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 16(17), 7612–7612. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177612

Young, A. O., Brown, A., Collins, T. A., & Glanz, K. (2023). Food insecurity, Neighborhood Food environment, and Health disparities: State of the science, Research Gaps and Opportunities. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 119(3), 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.12.019