Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Capstone Part I: PICOT Assignment

In adult patients with type 2 diabetes (P), how does the addition of Ozempic (semaglutide) (I), compared to metformin therapy alone (C), affect average weight loss (O) over a two-month period (T)?

This section should be 3-4 pages 5 references

CAPSTONE: PART I 

The PICOT will be a health issue identified at work or in the community. Be creative! There are certain topics that have been saturated in healthcare and have been implemented multiple times already.  Do not present on the following topics:

Diabetes, CHF, Blood pressure, Infection Control (hand washing, post op infections), Medication compliance programs, Telemedicine/Home programs

1.  Title Page

2. Introduction to your proposed problem: 

- Significance of the Practice Problem: Discuss the identified Practice Problem.

-Introduce the topic of the paper. 

-Describe the health problem. Don't type "Introduction.”

-Using data and statistics, support your claim that your selected issue is a problem.

- Include your purpose statement and what specifically you will address in your proposed program. 

-Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable.

3. PICOT- Should be discussed in detail. This section should include your PICOT question but also should provide thorough descriptions of your population, intervention, comparison intervention, outcome, and timing (if appropriate to your question).

The word PICOT is a mnemonic derived from the elements of a clinical research question – patient, intervention, comparison, outcome, and (sometimes) time. The PICOT process begins with a case scenario, and the question is phrased to elicit an answer. P – Patient/Problem I – Intervention C – Comparison O – Outcome T – Timeframe

4. Describe the vulnerable population 

-Discuss the impact of social determinants on health for your selected population.

-What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? 

-Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. 

5. Research should be from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem.

-Peer-reviewed research articles not older than five years (all articles must be used in your paper)

6. Proposal 

-Propose addressing the selected health problem using an evidence-based intervention in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. 

-Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role.

-Be sure to include a timeline for the intervention proposed. 

7. Theoretical Framework/Nursing Theory- This section should include the theoretical framework which supports your project. Describe a theory or model to serve as the foundation for your project.

- Overall, you should be able to introduce the problem and why this is significant to the healthcare system. For example: What impact does it have on the patient, community, cost of care, quality of life, readmissions and so forth

-Use appropriate APA 7th Ed. format along with Syllabus outline

-Scholarly, peer-reviewed, and research articles cited should be within the last five years. 

-This section should be 3-4 pages long (not including the title and reference page).

 -Use proper in-text citations with a properly formatted reference list. 

 -All papers must be written in the 3rd person.

Rubric Grading Part I.docx

RITERIA OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD GOOD UNACCEPTABLE PICOT-Describe the proposed health problem in details. What are you proposing to change? Provide evidence using data and statistics and literature to support your problem. 20 points Thoroughly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address. Briefly identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address. Vaguely identified and discussed the problem and aspect to address Did not identified the problem. Describe your population in details.. Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. 20 points Thoroughly identified or described population supported by evidence. Briefly identified or described population supported by evidence. Vaguely identified or described population supported by evidence. Did not identified or described population supported by evidence. Depth of Discussion and Cohesiveness. Provide a literature review from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. 20 points In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper. Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper. Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. The paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship between material obtained from all sources. Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections. It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate an understanding any relationship Use of Theoretical Nursing Framework used to align with the proposed health problem. Thoroughly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention Briefly selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention Vaguely selected and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention Did not select and present an appropriate health promotion/ disease prevention

20 points theoretical or conceptual model T theoretical or conceptual model theoretical or conceptual model theoretical or conceptual model Spelling and Grammar 10 points Fewer than 5 grammatical, spelling, capitalization, or punctuation errors. Required word count has been met. More than 5 but fewer than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors Required word count is 25 words below the minimum required count. More than 10 grammatical, spelling, capitalization & punctuation errors Required word count is 50 words below the minimum required count. An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Required word count is more than 50 words below the minimum required count. Sources 10 points Over 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer- review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special- interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All websites utilized are authoritative. 5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are authoritative. Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All websites utilized are credible. Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all websites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not curren