Directions:
Using the information from the two studies referenced in this week's lecture:
1. Identify the variables being measured in each survey and explain which measure of central tendency would be used to evaluate them.
2. Write the results for study I and extrapolate to the COVID19 vaccination information for the state of Florida.
Submission Instructions:
· It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
References
Bhandari, P. (2020). Descriptive statistics, definitions, types, examples. Scribbr.
https://www.scribbr.com/statistics/descriptive-statistics/
Links to an external site.
CDC. (2022). Prevaccination checklist for COVID-19 vaccines for vaccine recipients.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/pre-vaccination-screening-form.pdf
Links to an external site.
Glen., S. (2021). Odds ratio calculation and interpretation. Statistics how to.
https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/probability-main-index/odds-ratio/
Links to an external site.
Mcleod, S. (2018). Questionnaire: definition, examples, design, and types. Simplypsychology.org; Simply Psychology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaires.html
Links to an external site.
Scott, I., & Mazhindu, D. (2014). Statistics for healthcare professionals: an introduction. Sage.
Spirer, H., Spirer, L., & Jaffe, A. J. (1998). Misused statistics. (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Sun, Y., Fu, Z., Bo, Q., Mao, Z., Ma, X., & Wang, C. (2020). The reliability and validity of PHQ-9 in patients with major depressive disorder in a psychiatric hospital. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02885-6
Links to an external site.
Weatherburn, D. (2011). Uses and abuses of crime statistics. Crime and justice bulletin: Contemporary issues in crime and justice, NSW bureau of crime statistics and research, 153, 1 – 16.
Official Assignment Rubric
|
- Official Assignment Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism
Concept Application
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.
|
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar
Written Communication
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
Minimal (1 - 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
Severe (8 - 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
|
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication
Specific Formatting
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The assignment meets 90 % - 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.
|
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking
Thought analysis process
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.
|
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy
Quality of Sources and APA Citations
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Excellent
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Good
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Fair
Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Poor
The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.
|
12 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
butterflyl
2 years ago
8
files (1)
