Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

butterflyl

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Nursing homework help

2 years ago
21.08.2024
20

Report issue

files (1)

assigment2.docx

assigment2.docx

Module 1: Assignment 2

Using the reading covered in this module review the scenarios below. For each method, determine if a probability sampling or non probability sampling method is used. For each question, determine if this an effective way to determine patient satisfaction. Why or why not?

1. The CEO of a regional hospital wants to survey patient satisfaction after being discharged from the hospital.

2. A case manager is sent to the discharge area to interview patients as they are leaving the hospital.

3. You have the nurses on the floor distribute a questionnaire to each patient asking they complete the survey and return it at the discharge counter before they leave.

4. The CEO randomly selects a set of patients about to be discharged from the hospital and questions those that they have selected.

5. The CEO groups the patients by departments and randomly selects a patient from each department and surveys that patient to evaluate the department.

· Answer each question with a minimum of 2 paragraphs. Your submission must include a properly formatted title and reference pages. 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Sunday.

· It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Official Open Answer Questions Rubric

- Official Open Answer Questions Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

Each response is fully aligned with the question. In addition, responses demonstrate complete mastery of the content by including highly appropriate, detailed information and excellent examples.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

Each response is fully aligned with the question. In addition, responses demonstrate a good mastery of the content by including basic information and examples.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

Some responses do not answer the question being asked or provide incorrect information. Response(s) demonstrate partial mastery of the content.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

Responses demonstrate lack of mastery of the information. They may be off topic, incorrect, or include poor examples and details.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Quality of Information

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

Response(s) thoroughly identify the problem, situation or issue at hand and provide an adequate conclusion / solution supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

Response(s) identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Responses provide an adequate conclusion or solution, but only partially supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

Response(s) identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Responses provide an adequate conclusion or solution, but they are not supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples.

21 to >18.0 pts

Poor

Response(s) do/does not identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Absent or unclear conclusion / solution. Inadequate or absent examples or secondary ideas.

18 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Organization

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Writing is well structured with a clear beginning, a middle and conclusion (as appropriate). Examples and supporting evidence are inserted to strengthen the response. Information and thought process flows logically.

18 to >16.0 pts

Good

Writing is structured and includes examples and supporting evidence to strengthen the response. Information and thought process flows logically.

16 to >14.0 pts

Fair

Writing somewhat disorganized with limited examples and supporting evidence.

14 to >12.0 pts

Poor

Writing is disorganized with few examples and supporting evidence.

12 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 - 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 - 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

assigment2.docx

Module 1: Assignment 2

1. The CEO of a regional hospital wants to survey patient satisfaction after being discharged from the hospital.

2. A case manager is sent to the discharge area to interview patients as they are leaving the hospital.

3. You have the nurses on the floor distribute a questionnaire to each patient asking they complete the survey and return it at the discharge counter before they leave.

4. The CEO randomly selects a set of patients about to be discharged from the hospital and questions those that they have selected.

5. The CEO groups the patients by departments and randomly selects a patient from each department and surveys that patient to evaluate the department.

· Answer each question with a minimum of 2 paragraphs. Your submission must include a properly formatted title and reference pages. 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Submission Instructions:

· Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Sunday.

· It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Official Open Answer Questions Rubric

- Official Open Answer Questions Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

Each response is fully aligned with the question. In addition, responses demonstrate complete mastery of the content by including highly appropriate, detailed information and excellent examples.

36 to >32.0 pts

Good

Each response is fully aligned with the question. In addition, responses demonstrate a good mastery of the content by including basic information and examples.

32 to >28.0 pts

Fair

Some responses do not answer the question being asked or provide incorrect information. Response(s) demonstrate partial mastery of the content.

28 to >24.0 pts

Poor

Responses demonstrate lack of mastery of the information. They may be off topic, incorrect, or include poor examples and details.

24 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Quality of Information

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

Response(s) thoroughly identify the problem, situation or issue at hand and provide an adequate conclusion / solution supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

Response(s) identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Responses provide an adequate conclusion or solution, but only partially supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

Response(s) identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Responses provide an adequate conclusion or solution, but they are not supported with secondary ideas, and/or examples.

21 to >18.0 pts

Poor

Response(s) do/does not identify the problem, situation, or issue at hand. Absent or unclear conclusion / solution. Inadequate or absent examples or secondary ideas.

18 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Organization

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

18 to >16.0 pts

Good

Writing is structured and includes examples and supporting evidence to strengthen the response. Information and thought process flows logically.

16 to >14.0 pts

Fair

Writing somewhat disorganized with limited examples and supporting evidence.

14 to >12.0 pts

Poor

Writing is disorganized with few examples and supporting evidence.

12 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics

10 to >9.0 pts

Excellent

Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors.

9 to >8.0 pts

Good

Minimal (1 - 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 pts

Fair

Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 pts

Poor

Severe (8 - 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

other Questions(10)