Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

butterflyl

Main
Similar Questions

Home >Homework Answsers >Nursing homework help

2 years ago
03.08.2024
40

Report issue

files (3)

WK7Assg-Ramirez-L.docx
part4.docx
M2Assgn-Ramirez-L.docx

WK7Assg-Ramirez-L.docx

Critical Appraisal of Research

Leadirys Ramirez Cabezas

Walden University

Essent of Evidence-Based Pract-Summer 2024

Dr. Mooring

June 14, 2024

Critical Appraisal of Research

The evidential best practices identified in the current literature is Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program into clinical practice for children and adolescents. According to Zhang et al., (2021) as well as Zhou et al., (2020) research studies have proved that MBSR programs helps in the reduction of anxiety symptoms and its practice is ongoing across different groups. Including MBSR such as mindfulness meditation, body awareness, and Yoga is helpful intervention for mental health. For instance, Zhou et al. (2020) reveal that MBSR significantly decreases the anxious symptoms of youths; hence, it may be crucial for pediatric populations in which early treatment may be more effective.

Fumero et al. (2020) support MBSR in clinical settings by carrying out a meta-review of several MBIs that prove to effect the anxiety disorders. In their meta-review, systematic, it is asserted that MBIs, in particular, MBSR seems to have greater efficacy than conventional therapies in some situations. Their methodology is robust: and both extensive literature searches and strict evaluation criteria were employed to ensure the authors’ findings were accurate. A meta-analysis by Zhou et al. (2020) corroborated the mentioned findings that the MBSR program appeared to cause a reduction in participants’ anxiety symptoms. These results stress the utility of including or implementing MBSR in practice to enhance mental health in patients diagnosed with an anxiety disorder.

Clinical practice for children and adolescents, according to Walter et al. (2020), calls for children and adolescents friendly methods of management for specific conditions of children and youths. Integrating MBSR within these principles lays the foundation for the best practices further and provides an opportunity to offer a non-pharmacological treatment option to be used as a single treatment or in combination with other treatments, similar to CBT. Thus, implementing the MBSR program into these guidelines adds a psychological and physiological component to anxiety treatment, improving youth patients' health and well-being (Walter et al., 2020).

References

Fumero, A., Peñate, W., Oyanadel, C., & Porter, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Anxiety Disorders. A Systematic Meta-Review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10030052

Walter, H. J., Bukstein, O. G., Abright, A. R., Keable, H., Ramtekkar, U., Suhler, J. R., & Rockhill, C. (2020). Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(10), 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.005

Zhang, D., Lee, E. K. P., Mak, E. C. W., Ho, C. Y., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review. British Medical Bulletin, 138(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab005

Zhou, X., Guo, J., Lu, G., Chen, C., Xie, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, C. (2020). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety symptoms in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 289, Article 113002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113002

part4.docx

Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.

In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.

· Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.

· Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

· Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)

· Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.

· Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.

· Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.

· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.

· Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.

· Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.

· Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:

· A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted

· An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)

Alternate Submission Method

You may also use Kaltura Personal Capture to record your narrated PowerPoint. This option will require you to create your PowerPoint slides first. Then, follow the Personal Capture instructions outlined on the Kaltura Media Uploader guideLinks to an external site. . This guide will walk you through downloading the tool and help you become familiar with the features of Personal Capture. When you are ready to begin recording, you may turn off the webcam option so that only "Screen" and "Audio" are enabled. Start your recording and then open your PowerPoint to slide show view. Once the recording is complete, follow the instructions found on the "Posting Your Video in the Classroom Guide" found on the Kaltura Media Uploader page for instructions on how to submit your video. For this option, in addition to submitting your video, you must also upload your PowerPoint file which must include your speaker notes.

By Day 7 of Week 10

Submit Part 4 of your Evidence-Based Project. Review the following submission instructions for the type of submission you choose.

M2Assgn-Ramirez-L.docx

Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI)

Leadirys Ramirez Cabezas

Walden University

Essent of Evidence-Based Pract-Summer 2024

Dr. Mooring

June 14, 2024

	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
Full citations of the selected articles	Zhang, D., Lee, E. K. P., Mak, E. C. W., Ho, C. Y., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review. British Medical Bulletin, 138(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab005	Fumero, A., Peñate, W., Oyanadel, C., & Porter, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Anxiety Disorders. A Systematic Meta-Review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10030052	Zhou, X., Guo, J., Lu, G., Chen, C., Xie, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, C. (2020). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety symptoms in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 289, Article 113002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113002	Walter, H. J., Bukstein, O. G., Abright, A. R., Keable, H., Ramtekkar, U., Suhler, J. R., & Rockhill, C. (2020). Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(10), 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.005
Statement of relevance	This paper provides a comprehensively detailed lit review of MBIs, which gives an overview of the broad application and efficacy and aligns directly with my clinical interest in MBIs for mental health. Ethical considerations that should be observed in conducting ethically sound research include voluntary participation, informed consent, and confidentiality.	This paper organizes the review of MBIs' effectiveness for anxiety disorders, an area of critical interest in apprehending the MBIs' Clinical impact. Among ethical considerations are original studies reviewed ensured participants had informed consent, volunteered to participate, and ensured maintenance of confidentiality.	The paper was focused on the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety in young people; hence, this is directly related to my interest in MBI; having well-informed consent and ensuring the confidentiality of the young participants are among the essential ethical considerations that were targeted in this study with regards to what the principal researcher had applied in a study concerning minors.	this peer-reviewed article offers guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of anxiety disorders in kids and young people which fits directly into my specialty area of MBI in child and adolescence population and mental health related issues. Some of the ethical concerns are the ability to obtain consent from the guardians of the children as well as from the children themselves, confidentiality, and patient care among the young patients.
Research Aim	The present study aims at summarizing as well as bringing a critical evaluation of existing literature on interventions based on mindfulness with a focus on the efficacy across different populations and settings and also to bring into light the expected outcomes associated with MBIs, such as improvement of mental health and reduction of stress and overall well-being.	The present meta-review will assess the effectiveness of MBIs in symptoms of anxiety by closely looking at available systematic reviews and meta-analyses, comparisons of MBIs to established therapies, and conditions under which MBIs are most effective.	This was a study designed to find out if mindfulness-based stress reduction would help young people reduce anxiety symptoms. It attempted to provide an accurate assessment of evidence by synthesizing existing findings through a systematic review and meta-analysis.	The purposes of this article are to present several methodical recommendations for treating anxious children and adolescents as well as to outline definite recommendations for clinical practice for the healthcare professionals who deals with pediatric patients with anxiety disorders. The guidelines are intended to provide a brief overview of the findings of the latest scientific research regarding the best practices to and strategies for the assessment and management of major depression, including pharmacological and CBT interventions. It also describes major research directions for treatment of anxiety in children as decided by the panel of researchers.
Research Methodology	This manuscript draws from a comprehensive literature review using the methodologies of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods in synthesizing MBIs. The authors systematically searched multiple academic databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles. In other words, the analysis of the current MBI state is both robust and inclusive.	This is a quantitative systematic meta-review methodology. This study conducted a comprehensive literature search via two significant databases, namely, MEDLINE via PubMed and PsycINFO, published from the year 2003 to 2020, and chose 12 reviews out of 82 initial references to analyze the effectiveness of MBIs in the symptoms of anxiety.	The study will utilize a quantitative methodology, applying a systematic review and meta-analysis. A review was made of several databases of the various studies and the identified relevant studies. Combining data from all eligible studies, a statistical analysis was performed to determine or compute the overall effect of MBSR on anxiety symptoms.	This article captures the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on a qualitative approach. A selected panel of child and adolescent psychiatrists expertly reviewed the existing literature on anxiety disorders in pediatric populations. The guidelines are synthetically developed based on empirical evidence, expert consensus, and clinical experience. This methodology is entrenched within the principles of evidence-based medicine. This has ensured the reliability and validity of the guidelines.
Strength of Methodology	The review’s quality is positive because of its methodology which systematically covers the problem and variations in study types that increase the credibility of the conclusions. This de-biasing is achieved by the extensive search strategy that is employed, and also by the use of diverse research methodologies in the included studies, thus allowing for appreciation of the qualitative evidence on MBIs.	It will provide the best reliability in synthesizing the evidence, taking into account an inclusive, systematic meta-review methodology. High validity is ensured using approaches such as rigorous selection and evaluation of the existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It will offer consistency of patterns and research gaps on the comparisons of effectiveness of MBI, specifically by robust studies conducted separately.	Meta-analysis is superior to individual research studies because this research design increases the reliability and validity by accreditation of several works together to create higher statistical power and generalizableness. Generalizability is reduced by a broad system of search, and rigor of assessing MBSR efficacy in lessening anxiety symptoms is provided by means of quantitative integration.	The methodology followed in this article is pretty sound and multi-source based on evidence to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Including expert consensus and clinical experience offers such guidelines practical applicability much needed for real-life healthcare situations. The rigor followed in the review process has given the recommendations the stamp of being most reliable and valid as a worthwhile resource to tackle pediatric anxiety disorders.

References

Fumero, A., Peñate, W., Oyanadel, C., & Porter, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Anxiety Disorders. A Systematic Meta-Review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10030052

Walter, H. J., Bukstein, O. G., Abright, A. R., Keable, H., Ramtekkar, U., Suhler, J. R., & Rockhill, C. (2020). Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(10), 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.005

Zhang, D., Lee, E. K. P., Mak, E. C. W., Ho, C. Y., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review. British Medical Bulletin, 138(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab005

Zhou, X., Guo, J., Lu, G., Chen, C., Xie, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, C. (2020). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety symptoms in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 289, Article 113002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113002

M2Assgn-Ramirez-L.docx

Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBI)

Leadirys Ramirez Cabezas

Walden University

Essent of Evidence-Based Pract-Summer 2024

Dr. Mooring

June 14, 2024

	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
Full citations of the selected articles	Zhang, D., Lee, E. K. P., Mak, E. C. W., Ho, C. Y., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review. British Medical Bulletin, 138(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab005	Fumero, A., Peñate, W., Oyanadel, C., & Porter, B. (2020). The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Anxiety Disorders. A Systematic Meta-Review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 704–719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10030052	Zhou, X., Guo, J., Lu, G., Chen, C., Xie, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, C. (2020). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety symptoms in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 289, Article 113002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113002	Walter, H. J., Bukstein, O. G., Abright, A. R., Keable, H., Ramtekkar, U., Suhler, J. R., & Rockhill, C. (2020). Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(10), 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.005
Statement of relevance	This paper provides a comprehensively detailed lit review of MBIs, which gives an overview of the broad application and efficacy and aligns directly with my clinical interest in MBIs for mental health. Ethical considerations that should be observed in conducting ethically sound research include voluntary participation, informed consent, and confidentiality.	This paper organizes the review of MBIs' effectiveness for anxiety disorders, an area of critical interest in apprehending the MBIs' Clinical impact. Among ethical considerations are original studies reviewed ensured participants had informed consent, volunteered to participate, and ensured maintenance of confidentiality.	The paper was focused on the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety in young people; hence, this is directly related to my interest in MBI; having well-informed consent and ensuring the confidentiality of the young participants are among the essential ethical considerations that were targeted in this study with regards to what the principal researcher had applied in a study concerning minors.	this peer-reviewed article offers guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of anxiety disorders in kids and young people which fits directly into my specialty area of MBI in child and adolescence population and mental health related issues. Some of the ethical concerns are the ability to obtain consent from the guardians of the children as well as from the children themselves, confidentiality, and patient care among the young patients.
Research Aim	The present study aims at summarizing as well as bringing a critical evaluation of existing literature on interventions based on mindfulness with a focus on the efficacy across different populations and settings and also to bring into light the expected outcomes associated with MBIs, such as improvement of mental health and reduction of stress and overall well-being.	The present meta-review will assess the effectiveness of MBIs in symptoms of anxiety by closely looking at available systematic reviews and meta-analyses, comparisons of MBIs to established therapies, and conditions under which MBIs are most effective.	This was a study designed to find out if mindfulness-based stress reduction would help young people reduce anxiety symptoms. It attempted to provide an accurate assessment of evidence by synthesizing existing findings through a systematic review and meta-analysis.	The purposes of this article are to present several methodical recommendations for treating anxious children and adolescents as well as to outline definite recommendations for clinical practice for the healthcare professionals who deals with pediatric patients with anxiety disorders. The guidelines are intended to provide a brief overview of the findings of the latest scientific research regarding the best practices to and strategies for the assessment and management of major depression, including pharmacological and CBT interventions. It also describes major research directions for treatment of anxiety in children as decided by the panel of researchers.
Research Methodology	This manuscript draws from a comprehensive literature review using the methodologies of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods in synthesizing MBIs. The authors systematically searched multiple academic databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles. In other words, the analysis of the current MBI state is both robust and inclusive.	This is a quantitative systematic meta-review methodology. This study conducted a comprehensive literature search via two significant databases, namely, MEDLINE via PubMed and PsycINFO, published from the year 2003 to 2020, and chose 12 reviews out of 82 initial references to analyze the effectiveness of MBIs in the symptoms of anxiety.	The study will utilize a quantitative methodology, applying a systematic review and meta-analysis. A review was made of several databases of the various studies and the identified relevant studies. Combining data from all eligible studies, a statistical analysis was performed to determine or compute the overall effect of MBSR on anxiety symptoms.	This article captures the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines based on a qualitative approach. A selected panel of child and adolescent psychiatrists expertly reviewed the existing literature on anxiety disorders in pediatric populations. The guidelines are synthetically developed based on empirical evidence, expert consensus, and clinical experience. This methodology is entrenched within the principles of evidence-based medicine. This has ensured the reliability and validity of the guidelines.
Strength of Methodology	The review’s quality is positive because of its methodology which systematically covers the problem and variations in study types that increase the credibility of the conclusions. This de-biasing is achieved by the extensive search strategy that is employed, and also by the use of diverse research methodologies in the included studies, thus allowing for appreciation of the qualitative evidence on MBIs.	It will provide the best reliability in synthesizing the evidence, taking into account an inclusive, systematic meta-review methodology. High validity is ensured using approaches such as rigorous selection and evaluation of the existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It will offer consistency of patterns and research gaps on the comparisons of effectiveness of MBI, specifically by robust studies conducted separately.	Meta-analysis is superior to individual research studies because this research design increases the reliability and validity by accreditation of several works together to create higher statistical power and generalizableness. Generalizability is reduced by a broad system of search, and rigor of assessing MBSR efficacy in lessening anxiety symptoms is provided by means of quantitative integration.	The methodology followed in this article is pretty sound and multi-source based on evidence to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Including expert consensus and clinical experience offers such guidelines practical applicability much needed for real-life healthcare situations. The rigor followed in the review process has given the recommendations the stamp of being most reliable and valid as a worthwhile resource to tackle pediatric anxiety disorders.