Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
butterflyl
3 years ago
25
files (2)Consideranareainhealthcareinwhichyouworkorareinterestedinworking.docx
AMP-450Rubric-BenchmarkInterprofessionalTeams_CollaborationandCommunication.pdf
Consideranareainhealthcareinwhichyouworkorareinterestedinworking.docx
Consider an area in health care in which you work or are interested in working. Examine the dynamics of the interprofessional team (physicians, nurses, physical therapists, social workers, health care administrators, etc.) in that setting. In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, explain how communication and collaborative strategies can be applied to ensure respectful interactions and to prevent or address potential issues among the team in that health care setting. Include the following:
1. Describe the health care setting and summarize the various individuals or teams typically working together in that setting.
2. Discuss what types of issues may occur and how these affect dynamics within the setting for health care workers and for patients and their families.
3. Discuss attributes of a healthy culture that help individuals or groups perform as a team.
4. Describe qualities of effective communication. Discuss how communication styles can be applied to facilitate productive communication.
5. Chapter 8 of your textbook discusses the dynamics of successful interprofessional health care teams. What is a boundary-spanning activity you could incorporate as a leader that would support a collaborative culture and enhance communication? Consider the interprofessional team you would be working with.
6. Explain how employee satisfaction impacts patient care. Describe qualities of professional communication that contribute to acceptable interactions with patients, their families, and other health care professionals.
7. Explain what your role is as a health care leader in helping to facilitate collaboration and clear communication among an interprofessional team, as well as with patients and their families.
A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:
BS Health Sciences
2.4: Describe qualities of professional communication that contribute to appropriate interactions with family, patients, and other health care professionals.
AMP-450Rubric-BenchmarkInterprofessionalTeams_CollaborationandCommunication.pdf
Benchmark – Interprofessional Teams: Collaboration and Communication -
Rubric
Health Care Setting and Employees 8 points
Criteria Description
Health Care Setting and Employees
5. Excellent 8 points
Health care setting and employees are thoroughly described. A clear understanding
of the health care setting and its employees is demonstrated.
4. Good 6.8 points
Health care setting and employees are described. Some detail or information is
needed for clarity.
3. Satisfactory 6 points
Description of health care setting and employees are summarized. There are
inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points
Descriptions of health care setting and employees are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Health care setting and employees are not described.
Issues Within Setting and E�ect on Stakeholders 8 points
Criteria Description
Issues Within Setting and Effect on Stakeholders
5. Excellent 8 points
Issues within the health care setting and how these affect dynamics for health care
workers and patients and their families are discussed. The narrative is well
supported and reflective of realistic issues and their impact in a health care setting.
4. Good 6.8 points
Collapse All
Issues within the health care setting and how these affect dynamics for health care
workers and patients and their families are discussed. Minor detail or rationale is
needed for clarity.
3. Satisfactory 6 points
General issues within the health care setting are discussed. How issues affect
dynamics for health care workers and patients and their families are summarized.
Support or rationale is needed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points
Some issues within the health care setting are discussed. It is unclear how these
issues affect the dynamics for health care workers and patients and their families.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Issues within health care setting are not discussed.
Attributes of Healthy Culture to Encourage Team Performance 19.2 points
Criteria Description
Attributes of Healthy Culture to Encourage Team Performance
5. Excellent 19.2 points
Attributes of a healthy culture that help individuals or groups perform as a team are
clearly identified and discussed in detail. The narrative is well-supported.
4. Good 16.32 points
Attributes of a healthy culture that help individuals or groups perform as a team are
discussed. Minor detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. Satisfactory 14.4 points
Some attributes of a healthy culture that help individuals or groups perform as a
team are summarized. Information or support is needed. There are inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 12.48 points
Attributes of a healthy culture that help individuals or groups perform as a team are
only partially presented.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Attributes of a healthy culture that help individuals or groups perform as a team are
not discussed.
Qualities and Styles for E�ective Communication 20.8 points
Criteria Description
Qualities and Styles for Effective Communication
5. Excellent 20.8 points
Qualities of effective communication and how communication styles can be applied
to facilitate productive communication are thoroughly discussed. The narrative is
well-supported.
4. Good 17.68 points
Qualities of effective communication and how communication styles can be applied
to facilitate productive communication is discussed. Some detail is needed for
clarity or accuracy.
3. Satisfactory 15.6 points
Summary on qualities of effective communication and how communication styles
can be applied to facilitate productive communication is presented. Some
information or support is needed. There are inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 13.52 points
Discussion on qualities of effective communication and how communication styles
can be applied to facilitate productive communication is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Qualities of effective communication and how communication styles can be applied
to facilitate productive communication are not discussed.
Boundary-Spanning Activity to Support Collaboration and
Communication 16 points
Criteria Description
Boundary-Spanning Activity to Support Collaboration and Communication
5. Excellent 16 points
A boundary-spanning activity and how it supports collaborative cultures and
ultimately enhances communication is thoroughly discussed and is considerate of
the interprofessional team.
4. Good 13.6 points
A boundary-spanning activity and how it supports collaborative cultures and
enhances communication is discussed.
3. Satisfactory 12 points
A boundary-spanning activity is identified and a summary on how it supports
collaborative cultures and enhances communication is outlined.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.4 points
A boundary-spanning activity is partially presented. It is unclear how it supports
collaborative cultures and enhances communication.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A boundary-spanning activity is not presented.
E�ect of Employee Satisfaction and Professional Communication on
Patient Care (B) 24 points
Criteria Description
Effect of Employee Satisfaction and Professional Communication on Patient Care (2.4)
5. Excellent 24 points
The effect of employee satisfaction on patient care is clearly explained. The
qualities of communication that facilitate acceptable interactions among the
interprofessional team, patients and families, are detailed. The narrative is well
supported.
4. Good 20.4 points
The effect of employee satisfaction on patient care is explained. The qualities of
communication that facilitate acceptable interactions among the interprofessional
team, patients and families, are described. Some detail is needed for clarity or
accuracy.
3. Satisfactory 18 points
The effect of employee satisfaction on patient care are generally explained. The
qualities of communication that facilitate acceptable interactions among the various
stakeholders are summarized. Information or support is needed. There are
inaccuracies.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 15.6 points
The effect of employee satisfaction on patient care, and qualities of communication
that facilitate acceptable interactions among the various stakeholders, are only
partially discussed.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The effect of employee satisfaction on patient care, and qualities of communication
that facilitate acceptable interactions among the various stakeholders, are not
discussed.
Personal Role as Health Care Leader to Interdisciplinary Team and
Patients 16 points
Criteria Description
Personal Role as Health Care Leader to Interdisciplinary Team and Patients
5. Excellent 16 points
Personal role as a health care leader facilitating collaboration and communication
among the interdisciplinary team, patient and patient families is explained in a well-
supported narrative.
4. Good 13.6 points
Personal role as a health care leader facilitating collaboration and communication
among the interdisciplinary team, patient and patient families is discussed. Some
detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. Satisfactory 12 points
Personal role as a health care leader facilitating collaboration and communication
among the interdisciplinary team, patient and patient families is outlined.
Information or support is needed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 10.4 points
Personal role as a health care leader facilitating collaboration and communication
among the interdisciplinary team, patients and patient families is only partially
discussed.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Personal role as a health care leader facilitating collaboration and communication
among the interdisciplinary team, patient and patient families is not discussed.
Thesis Development and Purpose 11.2 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent 11.2 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good 9.52 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and
reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory 8.4 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 7.28 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction 12.8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent 12.8 points
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and
compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good 10.88 points
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory 9.6 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents
minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the
purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 8.32 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not
support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language
use) 8 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent 8 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good 6.8 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory 6 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 8 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent 8 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good 6.8 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory 6 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors
may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of
control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly.
Documentation of Sources 8 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent 8 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good 6.8 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory 6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.2 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 160 points
