assessment practice

Naldo2

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Education homework help

education

3 years ago
30.11.2023
20

Report issue

files (1)

assessmentpractices.docx

assessmentpractices.docx

Before you begin this assignment, review the evaluation rubric.

Interview two professionals who hold a minimum of a graduate degree within the field (career path) you are pursuing now (i.e., physical therapy, athletic training, collegiate or professional strength & conditioning coaches, physical education teacher etc.,). Create interview questions that will determine:

1. Their philosophy of assessment and the professional practices they use to evaluate their patients, clients, students, athletes etc.

2. Which developmental domains they assess (i.e., motor, physical, affective/social, & cognitive) and, the reason(s) they conduct assessments or do not conduct assessments of individuals in each of the four domains discussed within the course text and other material this term.

3. What actions they take after they collect the assessment measurements and how often they conduct assessments during their meetings with patients, clients, athletes, students etc.

Once you have completed the interviews, prepare a 2-page " summary" report of what the interviews revealed to you about how these professionals viewed each domain of development.

Do not include every direct quote you received during the interviews. Include these questions in your assessment summary:

Did they view the domains equally in importance?

Which domains did they deem less important than others?

Since we know that all domains are interrelated, what justification did the interviewees provide you with for not conducting assessments in each domain?

What is your opinion about what you learned from these interviews.

What will you consider when you assess the cognitive, affective, motor & physical domains of human motor development after completing this course?

Use APA format to prepare your 2-page written document (title page and reference page not included). Be sure to make references to the course text and other course material and use appropriate citations.

Evaluation Rubric (10 points)

Assignment Objective: 3 points

Linkages to Course Material: 3 points

References & Citations: 2 points

Writing Proficiency: 2 points

Rubric

Motor Development Assessment Practices

Motor Development Assessment Practices

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Objective

3 pts

Excellent

Student directly addresses the main objective, and adds new insight not required within the directions. The author is able to synthesize this knowledge and relate to material covered in the course.

2 pts

Proficient

Student addresses main objective, but does not add new insight.

1 pts

Limited

Student attempts to address the main objective

0 pts

Poor

Assignment objective is not met.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinkages to Course Material

3 pts

Excellent

Course material and other references are used to clarify, compare and contrast findings.

2 pts

Proficient

Sufficient course material is used in paper to clarify, compare and contrast findings.

1 pts

Poor

Little or no course material to clarify, compare, contrast findings.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences & Citations

2 pts

Excellent

All evidence is properly cited using APA format

1 pts

Proficient

Evidence is cited, but there are some minor problems with completeness or APA format.

0 pts

Poor

No attempt to cite any reference.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Proficiency

2 pts

Excellent

All sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. No words are misused . All information is accurate. Paper has been spell-checked and contains no errors.

1 pts

Limited

A few sentences are grammatically incorrect or not clearly written. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked.

0 pts

Poor

Paper has many grammatical errors and bad writing. Paper has not been spell-checked or proofread, and contains numerous errors.

2 pts

Total Points: 10

assessmentpractices.docx

Before you begin this assignment, review the evaluation rubric.

1. Their philosophy of assessment and the professional practices they use to evaluate their patients, clients, students, athletes etc.

3. What actions they take after they collect the assessment measurements and how often they conduct assessments during their meetings with patients, clients, athletes, students etc.

Once you have completed the interviews, prepare a 2-page " summary" report of what the interviews revealed to you about how these professionals viewed each domain of development.

Do not include every direct quote you received during the interviews. Include these questions in your assessment summary:

Did they view the domains equally in importance?

Which domains did they deem less important than others?

Since we know that all domains are interrelated, what justification did the interviewees provide you with for not conducting assessments in each domain?

What is your opinion about what you learned from these interviews.

What will you consider when you assess the cognitive, affective, motor & physical domains of human motor development after completing this course?

Evaluation Rubric (10 points)

Assignment Objective: 3 points

Linkages to Course Material: 3 points

References & Citations: 2 points

Writing Proficiency: 2 points

Rubric

Motor Development Assessment Practices

Motor Development Assessment Practices

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Objective

3 pts

Excellent

Student directly addresses the main objective, and adds new insight not required within the directions. The author is able to synthesize this knowledge and relate to material covered in the course.

2 pts

Proficient

Student addresses main objective, but does not add new insight.

1 pts

Limited

Student attempts to address the main objective

0 pts

Poor

Assignment objective is not met.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinkages to Course Material

3 pts

Excellent

Course material and other references are used to clarify, compare and contrast findings.

2 pts

Proficient

Sufficient course material is used in paper to clarify, compare and contrast findings.

1 pts

Poor

Little or no course material to clarify, compare, contrast findings.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences & Citations

2 pts

Excellent

All evidence is properly cited using APA format

1 pts

Proficient

Evidence is cited, but there are some minor problems with completeness or APA format.

0 pts

Poor

No attempt to cite any reference.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Proficiency

2 pts

Excellent

All sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. No words are misused . All information is accurate. Paper has been spell-checked and contains no errors.

1 pts

Limited

A few sentences are grammatically incorrect or not clearly written. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked.

0 pts

Poor

Paper has many grammatical errors and bad writing. Paper has not been spell-checked or proofread, and contains numerous errors.

2 pts

Total Points: 10

other Questions(10)