ASSESSMENT: PHARMACOTHERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX PATIENTS PRESENTATION
topic: EVALUATING LEGAL AND ETHICAL PRESCRIBING PRACTICES FOR PAIN MANAGEMENT
a month ago
20
passedassignmentonpain.docx
ASSESSMENT.docx
passedassignmentonpain.docx
2
Evaluating Legal and Ethical Prescribing Practices for Pain Management
Advanced Pharmacoulogy
July 9, 2026
Communication of Pain Management Options
I would start with identifying Craig's pain problem and make him know that having low back pain continuously is a condition that needs proper treatment. I would address him respectfully and clearly. I would inform him that there exists an option to lower his pain without making him a victim of opioid addiction. The conversation will revolve around making decisions collaboratively. Craig will be advised to discuss pain, clinical goals, occupational requirements, and the addiction component.
I would explain that nonpharmacologic therapies should be the foundation of treatment. These approaches are physical therapy, exercises, weight loss, stretching, and workplace modifications. I would also mention medications for pain not related to opioids like acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) unless contraindicated for any reason. Duloxetine may also be considered if pain is not controlled as it has evidence in chronic musculoskeletal pain. I will explain the dangers of taking hydrocodone sourced from one’s friend. Hydrocodone is not legal, does not allow for proper monitoring, and is a risk factor for abuse and overdose (Phillips et al., 2020).
Requirements for Documentation, Monitoring, and Follow-up
Pain history of Craig, physical examination, function limitations, previous therapies, and response to treatment should be documented in his medical records. His family history of opioid abuse should also be recorded as he will be more likely to abuse them. Goals of treatment should be to improve function, not to remove all pain.
When opioid therapy is being contemplated, informed consent should be completed. Benefits, risks and alternatives should be recorded. Information from the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) should be checked before prescribing and during treatment. A baseline assessment for substance use risk should also be performed.
Follow-up should take place 1-4 weeks after initiation or switching of opioid therapy. At each visit, the pain relief, improved function, side effects and risk of misuse should be evaluated. Testing may be necessary once prior to beginning long-term opioid therapy, and periodically during. If the benefits are not greater than the risk, then the treatment should not be continued.
Pain Management and Prevention of Opioid Addiction
Craig suffers from chronic pain, works in a construction field, took someone else's opioid drug, and has a family history of addiction. Before beginning an opioid treatment program these factors must be taken into account. Multimodal treatment for pain should be emphasized. Exercise, education, CB techniques, and non-opioid drugs must be prioritized in the treatment. If there is no alternative to opioids, then it is advisable to prescribe the minimum required dose for the shortest possible period of time. Extended-release opioids should be avoided for patients naïve to opioids (U.S Food and Drug Administartion, 2025). Education should be provided for Craig on how to properly store, use and dispose of medications, and use drugs without alcohol or sedatives. Frequent evaluation can identify problems early on and make adjustments in treatment before addiction sets in.
Narcotic Pain Medication Options
Illinois grants full Scope of Practice for LPs and proper federal DEA registration to fully licensed NP practitioners to prescribe Schedule II–V controlled substances (IDFPR, 2024). Firstly, I would suggest alternatives to opioids for Craig due to the history of the family concerning the consumption of opioids as well as a dislike for long-term treatment with opioids. In case when this fails and Craig still experiences pain which limits his ability to function, I would prescribe a short-term therapy with immediate release hydrocodone-acetaminophen.
Ethical Considerations
Balance should be maintained between beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice when medications are prescribed ethically. Medications like opioids, can enable Craig to deal with his pain and go back to work. However, improperly ordered drugs can cause him addiction, overdose, or diversion. His family history and previous misuse increase these concerns. Not prescribing opioid would also be an unethical decision since Craig may end up with an out-of-control pain if not treated by an opioid. Shared decision-making with evidence-based care is the best ethical response. The approach upholds Craig's preferences, while keeping him safe, healthy, and protecting his public safety needs.
References
IDFPR. (2024). Controlled Substances. Idfpr.Illinois.Gov. https://idfpr.illinois.gov/profs/contsub.html
Phillips, J. K., Ford, M. A., & Bonnie, R. J. (2020, July 13). Evidence on Strategies for Addressing the Opioid Epidemic. Nih.Gov; National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK458653/
U.S Food and Drug Administartion. (2025). FDA Requires Major Changes to Opioid Pain Medication Labeling to Emphasize Risks. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-requires-major-changes-opioid-pain-medication-labeling-emphasize-risks
ASSESSMENT.docx
ASSESSMENT: PHARMACOTHERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX PATIENTS PRESENTATION
You have the opportunity to showcase your clinical expertise and creativity by developing a visually engaging, evidence-based presentation on a topic of your choice from the course curriculum. In this Assessment, you are encouraged to harness your creativity and actively engage your audience by designing a visually compelling and clinically relevant presentation. This activity encourages you to synthesize and organize key information from your coursework, presenting it in a clear and logical manner that demonstrates your ability to communicate complex ideas effectively. By preparing and delivering your presentation, you will not only deepen your understanding of the subject matter but also gain confidence in your oral communication abilities, an essential skill for advanced nursing practice and leadership roles.
You are encouraged to approach this assessment with creativity, utilizing visual aids and innovative presentation formats where appropriate. The goal is to create an engaging and informative experience.
Level 1: No AI Permitted
· AI tools may not be used at any stage
· Common for clinical documentation or performancebased work
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
To prepare:
· Select any topic from the course curriculum relevant to advanced pharmacology.
· You will explore a case and treatment rationale associated with your selected topic.
BY SUNDAY OF WEEK 10
Submit a 3-minute voiceover presentation summarizing your selected case and treatment rationale.
Your presentation should include five slides. Your slides should be clear, concise, and visually engaging. You are required to use a minimum of three scholarly sources published within the past 5 years.
The five slides should include the following:
· Slide 1: Topic Selection
· Choose any topic from the course curriculum relevant to advanced pharmacology.
· Slide 2: Case Development
· Create a detailed patient case scenario featuring at least two comorbid conditions.
· Include relevant patient history, presenting symptoms, and diagnostic findings.
· Slide 3: Treatment Plan
· Develop a pharmacotherapeutic plan addressing all comorbidities.
· Justify drug choices based on current guidelines, patient factors, and potential drug interactions.
· Discuss monitoring parameters, expected outcomes, and possible adverse effects.
· Slide 4: Ethical and Legal Considerations
· Evaluate ethical dilemmas and legal implications related to your treatment plan (e.g., informed consent, prescriptive authority).
· Slide 5: References
· Cite all scholarly sources published within the past 5 years using APA formatting.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD5Assgn_LastName_FirstInitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6521_Module5_Assignment2_Rubric
|
NURS_6521_Module5_Assignment2_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Development and Clinical Complexity |
10 to >8.9 ptsExcellentCreates a highly detailed, realistic patient case with ≥2 clearly described comorbidities; integrates relevant history, symptoms, and diagnostics accurately and logically. 8.9 to >7.9 ptsGoodProvides a clear case with ≥2 comorbidities; includes appropriate history and diagnostics with minor gaps. 7.9 to >6.9 ptsFairProvides a clear case with ≥2 comorbidities; includes appropriate history and diagnostics with minor gaps. 6.9 to >0 ptsPoorCase is incomplete, lacks required comorbidities, or contains inaccurate or missing clinical details. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePharmacotherapeutic Plan and Rationale |
7.5 to >6.7 ptsExcellentDevelops a comprehensive treatment plan addressing all comorbidities; thoroughly justifies drug choices using current guidelines; clearly explains interactions, monitoring, outcomes, and adverse effects. 6.7 to >5.9 ptsGoodTreatment plan is accurate and addresses most comorbidities; justification is mostly sound but may lack nuance or detail. 5.9 to >5.2 ptsFairPlan addresses some issues but is incomplete; justification is weak or lacks strong evidence; monitoring or interactions minimally addressed. 5.2 to >0 ptsPoorTreatment plan is inaccurate, incomplete, unsupported, or missing key rationale. |
7.5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical and Legal Considerations |
7.5 to >6.7 ptsExcellentProvides a thoughtful, wellsupported analysis of ethical dilemmas and legal implications relevant to the case; demonstrates advanced understanding of prescriptive authority and patient rights. 6.7 to >5.9 ptsGoodAddresses major ethical and legal considerations accurately but with limited depth or specificity. 5.9 to >5.2 ptsFairMentions ethical and legal concepts but with minimal detail, accuracy issues, or weak connection to the case. 5.2 to >0 ptsPoorEthical and legal considerations are inaccurate, missing, or not applied to the scenario. |
7.5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength of Presentation |
5 ptsExcellentPresentation is no more than 3 minutes in length. 0 ptsPoorPresentation is longer than 3 minutes. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism and Design |
7.5 to >6.7 ptsExcellentPresentation is consistently professional, well designed, and easy to follow. Visuals consistently complement the content. 6.7 to >5.9 ptsGoodPresentation is mostly professional, well designed, and easy to follow. Visuals mostly complement the content. 5.9 to >5.2 ptsFairPresentation is minimally professional. Some parts are poorly designed and difficult to follow. Visuals are poorly designed and/or do not complement content in some sections. 5.2 to >0 ptsPoorPresentation is disorganized, unclear, or incomplete. Visuals are distracting, confusing, or do not complement the content. |
7.5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeaker Delivery |
7.5 to >6.7 ptsExcellentSpeaker delivery is consistently engaging and clear. 6.7 to >5.9 ptsGoodSpeaker delivery is mostly engaging and clear. 5.9 to >5.2 ptsFairSpeaker delivery is minimally engaging. Some sections lack clarity. 5.2 to >0 ptsPoorSpeaker delivery is unclear or incomplete. |
7.5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting |
2.5 to >2.2 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors. Student work is original-- no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work. 2.2 to >1.9 ptsGoodAll sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors. Student work is original-- no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work. 1.9 to >1.7 ptsFairAll sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors. Student work is original-- no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work. 1.7 to >0 ptsPoorMissing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules. Student work is not original-- AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work. |
2.5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation |
2.5 to >2.2 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 2.2 to >1.9 ptsGoodUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors. 1.9 to >1.7 ptsFairUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors. 1.7 to >0 ptsPoorPost contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension. |
2.5 pts |
Total Points: 50
image1.png
image2.png
- as discussed
- help with Java Script and html home work 1
- Restorative Justice Paper
- Paper In Global Communication
- Trevor Price bought 10-year bonds issued by Harvest Foods five years ago for $1,007.53. The bonds make semiannual coupon payments...
- Diversity
- for guru2009
- English response
- 3 fin question
- analysis