ASN Quality Improvement Professional Project
You can pick the topic since you are the one who will be doing it.
Let me know if you have any questions.
a month ago
20
QualityImprovementProjectInstructions.pdf
Rubric.docx
QualityImprovementProjectInstructions.pdf
Quality Improvement Project
In this assignment, you will identify a real quality or safety issue in your clinical setting and design a small, evidence-based quality improvement project to address it. Quality improvement in health care is a systematic, continuous effort to improve care processes and patient outcomes, and strong projects include a clear aim, defined measures, and a practical intervention.
During clinical, observe nursing care, unit routines, and patient-care processes. You may also speak with staff to better understand workflow challenges, but your project should remain focused on one specific, manageable issue that could realistically be improved through a small change in practice.
Project focus
Choose one issue such as the following:
• Inconsistent fall-risk precautions.
• Delays in pain reassessment.
• Incomplete patient education, such as new medication teaching or diabetes teaching.
• Hand hygiene or PPE non-compliance.
• Communication gaps during handoff or discharge.
Your topic should be narrow enough to study clearly and practical enough to support a small improvement plan with measurable results. Quality improvement models commonly begin by defining the aim, identifying measures, and selecting a change to test in practice.
Written paper
Submit a 3-5 page paper, not including the title page or reference page, using APA format.
Organize your paper using the sections below:
1. Introduction to the problem Briefly identify the issue observed in the clinical setting and state why it is appropriate for a quality improvement project.
2. Clinical background and why the issue matters Explain the setting, patient population, or workflow involved. Describe why the problem matters for patient safety, quality of care, efficiency, staff communication, or patient outcomes.
3. Evidence/literature summary Summarize current evidence that helps explain the problem and supports improvement efforts. Use scholarly sources to show what is already known about the issue and which interventions have been effective.
4. Proposed quality improvement intervention Describe the small, evidence-based change you would implement. Your intervention should be realistic for the clinical setting and clearly connected to the problem you identified.
5. Measurement plan and expected outcomes Explain how you would know whether the intervention worked. Strong QI plans include measurable indicators such as process, outcome, and sometimes balancing measures.
6. Reflection on learning Discuss what you learned about quality improvement in nursing, including how nurses identify problems, use evidence, and evaluate whether change improves care.
Paper expectations
• Use a clear, professional title.
• Write in formal academic style.
• Support key points with scholarly evidence.
• Use APA in-text citations and a reference page.
• For APA 7 student papers, use double spacing, 1-inch margins, and an appropriate readable font used consistently throughout the paper.
• APA 7 student title pages typically include the paper title, your name, institutional affiliation, course number and name, instructor name, and due date.
• An abstract is usually not required for student papers unless your instructor specifically asks for one.
Presentation
Also submit a recorded PowerPoint presentation summarizing your project. The presentation should be clear, concise, and focused on the main elements of your proposed quality improvement plan.
Suggested length: 6-10 slides, excluding title and references slides.
Include the following:
• The identified problem.
• Why the problem is important.
• Supporting evidence.
• The proposed intervention.
• How success would be measured.
• Expected outcomes or impact on patient care.
Presentation expectations
• Keep slides focused and easy to read.
• Use brief bullet points rather than long paragraphs.
• Speak clearly and professionally in your recording.
• Make sure your narration explains the clinical issue, the evidence, and the logic for your proposed intervention.
• Include a title slide and a references slide in APA style.
Evaluation criteria
Your project will be evaluated on:
• Clear identification of a relevant clinical quality or safety issue.
• Appropriate use of evidence to support the project.
• Feasibility and relevance of the proposed intervention.
• Quality and clarity of the measurement plan.
• Understanding of quality improvement in nursing practice.
• Organization, professionalism, and APA formatting in the paper and presentation.
Example of a strong project focus
A strong topic might be: Pain reassessment after PRN medication is inconsistently documented on a medical-surgical unit. A reasonable intervention could be a reminder
prompt or standardized reassessment workflow, with success measured by the percentage of patients who receive documented reassessment within the expected timeframe.
Rubric.docx
Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric
|
Quality Improvement Professional Project Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Topic Identification & Clinical Engagement view longer description |
Exceeds Expetations Clear, relevant QI topic; strong collaboration; clear impact (18–20 pts) 20 pts Meets Expectations QI topic identified; some collaboration; relevant (14–17 pts) 17 pts Needs Improvement Unclear topic; minimal collaboration (0–13 pts) 13 pts |
/20 pts |
|
Scholarly Paper view longer description |
Exceeds Expectations Well-organized, strong evidence & analysis; excellent APA (36–40 pts) 40 pts Meets Expectations Adequate evidence & organization; minor APA issues (30–35 pts) 35 pts Needs Improvement Limited evidence; disorganized; APA errors (0–29 pts) 29 pts |
/40 pts |
|
Professional Presentation view longer description |
Exceeds Expectations Highly professional; clear delivery & visuals (18–20 pts) 20 pts Meets Expectations Clear presentation; adequate visuals (14–17 pts) 17 pts Needs Improvement Disorganized or unclear; limited prep (0–13 pts) 13 pts |
/20 pts |
|
Sharing Findings with Clinical Leadership view longer description |
Exceeds Expectations Clearly presented; reflection on impact (9–10 pts) 10 pts Meets Expectations Evidence of sharing; minimal reflection (7–8 pts) 8 pts Needs Improvement No clear evidence of sharing (0–6 pts) 0 pts |
/10 pts |
|
Professionalism & Completion view longer description |
Exceeds Expectations All guidelines followed; on time (9–10 pts) 10 pts Meets Expectations Minor issues (7–8 pts) 8 pts Needs Improvement Guidelines not followed/late (0–6 pts) 0 pts |
/10 pts |
- HUM111 Together We Stand Letter.doc
- Cultural Influences on Work and Leisure Time
- FIN 571 Week 2 Individual Assignment Text Problem SetsFIN 571 Week 2 Individual Assignment Text Problem Sets [Pin It]
- Question 1 Shown below are rental and leasing revenue figures for office machinery and equipment in the United States over a 7-year period according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Use these data and the regression tool in the data analysis tool pack to run a
- 07
- let f (x)=4X-2 and g (X)=-2x^2+8
- Process Designs and Supply Chains, Pt 2
- CJA 484 Week 2 Individual Assignment Ethics Justice Administration Analysis 1
- Vertical analysis (common-size) percentages for Vallejo Company’s sales
- 2 Management Excel Problems