argument aggainst exclusionary rule

I need 1000 words arguing against exclusionary rule. I don't need anyone to define what exclusionary rule. I just need to argue that police should have more authority overall b/c guilty people are set free so please don't be writing on what exclusionary rule and don't define it within the first draft. I need you to argue points like the ones below 

Police should have control and authority to bring justice: 

- police should be trusted to search people to find criminals

- police should be given more authority to enforce laws to keep peace. 

- police should be given more power because criminals should not be let off the hook.

- police should be allowed to search suspected individuals because they may have committed crimes. 

we shouldn't take out the evidence because it helps guilty people as they go free. 

- The rule provides a loophole for guilty individuals 

- It allows for miscarriage of justice

- a murderer is set free due to this rule.