Applied Sciences Health Care Job Analaysis/ Community Care Assignment
Minicaa
7 months ago
35
files (4)465-CommunityCareApplication.docx
465JobAnalysis.docx
465Rubric-CommunityCareApplication.pdf
465Rubric-JobAnalysis.pdf
465-CommunityCareApplication.docx
In a total of 500-750 words, respond to the questions located in the Community Care scenario.
Attached is the scenario and rubric
465JobAnalysis.docx
You are a department manager and would like to hire an additional staff member to work in the health care organization department. Draft an e-mail to your supervisor according to the instructions below. Remember to consider the legislative and regulatory requirements as they relate to hiring within your organization for that position. In 200-350 words, address the following:
1. Describe the process of personnel analysis and how the position will fit into the organization or the organizational chart? To what department will the staff member be assigned?
2. Justify the process of recruitment, selection, legal interviewing requirements, and placement in the organization.
Include a copy of the proposed job description with your request. The job description should include the following:
1. Include how to apply and to whom to address the cover letter.
2. Position title
3. Supervisory duties, if there are any, or if not, why not.
4. Title of immediate supervisor for the position.
5. Position description in words.
6. Position-specific duties and responsibilities using key performance indicators (KPI).
7. Qualifications or experience required.
8. Identify the credentials required when hiring personnel in the health care field or department.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
465Rubric-CommunityCareApplication.pdf
Community Care Application - Rubric Total 30 points
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
Critical Thinking:
Demonstrate the ability to
utilize appropriate
resources for decision
making.
Critical Thinking:
Demonstrate the ability to
utilize appropriate resources
for decision making.
0 points
Student does not utilize
appropriate resources for
decision making. Solution is
inappropriate and lacks
rationale.
6.83 points
Student partially utilizes
appropriate resources for
decision making. Student
proposes an appropriate
solution, but significant
rationale is needed.
7.88 points
Student utilizes appropriate
resources for decision
making. Student proposes an
appropriate solution in the
form of a summary.
Moderate details are needed
in recognizing implications
for all parties involved, and in
supporting rationale.
8.92 points
Student significantly utilizes
resources for decision
making. Minor details are
needed in recognizing
implications for all parties
involved, and in supporting
rationale.
10.5 points
Student completely utilizes
resources for decision
making. Student proposes an
appropriate solution
supported with detailed
rationale.
Rationale
Rationale: Provide
justification for decisions and
action plans, including
appropriate ethical
considerations.
0 points
Student does not provide any
justification for decisions and
action plans, including
appropriate ethical
considerations.
5.85 points
Student provides partial
justification for decisions and
action plans, including
appropriate ethical
considerations.
6.75 points
Student provides appropriate
justification for decisions and
action plans, including
appropriate ethical
considerations.
7.65 points
Student provides significant
justification for decisions and
action plans, including
appropriate ethical
considerations.
9 points
Student provides complete
justification for decisions and
action plans, including
appropriate ethical
considerations.
Synthesis
Synthesis: Integrate
principles, concepts,
theories, and ideas
presented in the course
content and program of
study in a logical manner.
0 points
Student does not
successfully integrate ideas
or course concepts; or the
combination of elements is
not logical or verifiable.
5.85 points
Student attempts to
integrate ideas or course
concepts. The combination of
elements is not logical or
verifiable.
6.75 points
Student integrates ideas or
course concepts, but the
combination of elements at
times is confusing.
7.65 points
Student integrates ideas or
course concepts, and
combination of elements is
logical or verifiable.
9 points
Student integrates ideas or
course concepts, and
synthesis is unique. Synthesis
shows careful planning and
attention to how different
elements fit together. The
combination of elements is
logical and verifiable.
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, and
language use)
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, and
language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is
employed.
0.98 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or
word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
1.13 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and
varied sentence structure
and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
1.28 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of
effective sentence structures
and figures of speech.
1.5 points
The writer is clearly in
command of standard
written academic English.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
465Rubric-JobAnalysis.pdf
Health Care Job Analysis - Rubric Total 50 points
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less Than
Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
Personnel Analysis Position
Personnel Analysis Position
0 points
A description of the process
of personnel analysis, how
the position fits into the
organization or
organizational chart, and
what department the staff
member is going to be
assigned is not included.
8.13 points
A description of the process
of personnel analysis, how
the position fits into the
organization or
organizational chart, and
what department the staff
member is going to be
assigned is present, but it
lacks detail or is incomplete.
9.38 points
A description of the process
of personnel analysis, how
the position fits into the
organization or
organizational chart, and
what department the staff
member is going to be
assigned is detailed.
10.63 points
A description of the process
of personnel analysis, how
the position fits into the
organization or
organizational chart, and
what department the staff
member is going to be
assigned is present.
12.5 points
A description of the process
of personnel analysis, how
the position fits into the
organization or
organizational chart, and
what department the staff
member is going to be
assigned is thorough.
Recruitment, Selection,
Legal Interviewing
Requirements, and
Placement
Recruitment, Selection, Legal
Interviewing Requirements,
and Placement
0 points
A justification for
recruitment, selection, legal
interviewing requirements,
and placement is not
present.
8.13 points
A justification for
recruitment, selection, legal
interviewing requirements,
and placement is present,
but lacks detail or is
incomplete.
9.38 points
A justification for
recruitment, selection, legal
interviewing requirements,
and placement is present.
10.63 points
A justification for
recruitment, selection, legal
interviewing requirements,
and placement is detailed.
12.5 points
A justification for
recruitment, selection, legal
interviewing requirements,
and placement is thorough.
Synthesis
Synthesis
0 points
Synthesis does not
successfully integrate ideas,
images, or objects to form a
cohesive whole. The
combination of elements is
not logical or verifiable.
1.63 points
Synthesis integrates ideas,
images, or objects
inadequately. The
combination of elements is
not logical.
1.88 points
Synthesis integrates ideas,
images, or objects but does
not fully form a cohesive
whole. Combination of
elements at times is
confusing.
2.13 points
Synthesis is distinctive.
Synthesis shows careful
planning and attention to
how disparate elements fit
together. The combination of
elements is verified.
2.5 points
Synthesis integrates ideas,
images, or objects to form a
cohesive whole. Combination
of elements is logical and
justified.
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, and
language use)
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, and
language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is
employed.
3.25 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or
word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.
3.75 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of
effective sentence structures
and figures of speech.
4.25 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and
varied sentence structure
and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
5 points
The writer is clearly in
command of standard,
written, academic English.
Job Description
Job Description (Including the
how to apply, who to address
the cover letter to, position
title, supervisory duties, title
of immediate supervisor,
position description, job
specific duties and
responsibilities,
qualifications, and required
credentials)
0 points
A description of the job is not
present.
11.38 points
A description of the job is
present, but it lacks detail or
is incomplete.
13.13 points
A description of the job is
present.
14.88 points
A description of the job is
well developed.
17.5 points
A description of the job is
thoroughly developed with
supporting details.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
- Assignment 2: Exploring Interests to Identify Research Problems
- STR 581 Week 2 Capstone Final Exam Part 1. Get an A++.
- Discovery of a Time Capsule
- ACC 490 Week 1 Individual Assignment Generally Accepted Auditing Standards Paper
- Hello
- who can do this ?
- accounting help
- Piaget and Kohlberg
- Nyanya only
- Project Management Phase 2
