answer 4 questions, each question in one page at least. 4 pages total at least

1- why do think verbal aggression is so prevalent in today's society ?

2- what does it mean when we say argumentative and aggressive communication can serve a strategic purpose ?

3- Given that trait theorists, situationists, and interactionists all offer explanations for behavior, which one do you think is the most comprehensive explanation? why ?

4- why would researchers be concerned with perceptions of the probability and importance of success and failure in an argument when trying to explain a person's argumentative behavior in a given situation ?

please use this link to read a little especially about question three and four. 

the name of the book for more info : Argumentative and aggressive communication, for Andrew S. Rancer and Theodore A. Avtgis, chapter one and three. 

https://books.google.com/books?id=vCSgZcrh98sC&pg=PT98&lpg=PT98&dq=given+that+trait+theorists,+situationists,+and+interactionists+all+offer+explanations+for+behavior,+which+one+do+think+is+the+most+comprehensive+explanation?+why+?&source=bl&ots=5KcJT8Etdl&sig=UbRDk7V41zTbD75-VoiD0JzYRZw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj-2IOApvLdAhVFyYMKHYpHD3sQ6AEwCnoECAYQAQ#v=onepage&q=given%20that%20trait%20theorists%2C%20situationists%2C%20and%20interactionists%20all%20offer%20explanations%20for%20behavior%2C%20which%20one%20do%20think%20is%20the%20most%20comprehensive%20explanation%3F%20why%20%3F&f=false