Agency Synopsis
Daniela.Padron
4 months ago
15
files (1)AgencySynopsis.docx
AgencySynopsis.docx
Agency Synopsis
The purpose of this assignment is so that you will be able to differentiate between the healthcare policy agencies’ impact on various patient populations.
1. Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system in the US.
2. Create a table listing at least 5 regulatory agencies.
3. Address the following in the table:
A. Column 1: Name of the Agency
B. Column 2: General description of the agency.
C. Column 3: Level of authority (regional, state, federal, etc.)
D. Column 4: Role in high-risk patient populations that your selected policy affects.
E. Citation for the information in the row (updated / published within the past 5 years).
Submission Instructions:
· In the table, write the criteria in the top row, and the agency’s name in the first column.
· Enter the requested information in the table as directed.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Essay/Paper Rubric
|
Essay/Paper Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
Distinguished Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues/problems. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues/problems. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
Distinguished Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Provides competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Full Marks Demonstrates a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Demonstrates a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Demonstrates a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
image1.png
AgencySynopsis.docx
Agency Synopsis
The purpose of this assignment is so that you will be able to differentiate between the healthcare policy agencies’ impact on various patient populations.
1. Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system in the US.
2. Create a table listing at least 5 regulatory agencies.
3. Address the following in the table:
A. Column 1: Name of the Agency
B. Column 2: General description of the agency.
C. Column 3: Level of authority (regional, state, federal, etc.)
D. Column 4: Role in high-risk patient populations that your selected policy affects.
E. Citation for the information in the row (updated / published within the past 5 years).
Submission Instructions:
· In the table, write the criteria in the top row, and the agency’s name in the first column.
· Enter the requested information in the table as directed.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Essay/Paper Rubric
|
Essay/Paper Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
Distinguished Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues/problems. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues/problems. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
Distinguished Provides thorough, competent, and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Provides competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Provides competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature |
Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
|
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
Full Marks Demonstrates a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 3.1 to 4 pts Excellent Demonstrates a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 2.1 to 3 pts Fair Demonstrates a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 0.1 to 2 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was submitted. 0 to 0 pts |
/4 pts |
image1.png
- compensation philosophy
- no quotes
- Directions: Answer the following questions on a separate document. Explain how you reached the answer or show your work if a mathematical calculation is needed, or both. Submit your assignment using the assignment link above. A. You have just won the Lott
- Week 3 Art Work Created During the Great Depression (2)*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial*****Use as Guide Paper*****
- Rhetorical analyses
- B7440 Managing Global Challenges | Week 6
- Research paper on Host Base Security System (HBSS)
- Management of Information Systems
- 12 hours - 1 page
- I need 8 pages of original work in APA format. must be Original! must be APA format with references!
