Addictions case study: part 2 – diagnostic impressions

AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx

image1.png

Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx

EDCO 740

Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions

Assignment Instructions

Overview

The Addictions Case Study Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to a potential counseling situation. The assignment will be divided up into three parts: Addictions Case Study: Part 1 - Case Conceptualization Assignment, Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions Assignment, and Addictions Case Study: Part 3 - Treatment Plan Assignment.

General Paper Instructions

The general requirements for the paper are:

· A medium-length paper (about a 7- to 9-page summary, not including the title and references pages – no abstract is needed).

· This is to be formatted in the most current APA style.

· For this assignment, you are only required to use one source: the DSM-5-TR (however, you can add more if desired).

Assignment Specific Instructions

For Addictions Case Study: Part 2 - Diagnostic Impressions Assignment, again using the Addictions Case Study: Narrative, take what you wrote in Part 1 and from the narrative, then document your diagnostic impressions of the client. In your write-up, using the DSM-5-TR, you will need to answer (each bullet is about a paragraph – review the rubric for more detail):

· What is the primary diagnosis for this client? Put your full diagnosis in bold and list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.

· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?

· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?

· What are any secondary and tertiary diagnoses for this client? Put your full diagnosis in bold and list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.

· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?

· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?

Note that each diagnosis you give needs to have the ICD-10 code written in this order: F-code number (without the parentheses), the name of the diagnosis, the severity, and any appropriate specifiers (if required).

Divide your paper as follows (showing each heading below as level 1 or level 2, starting on p. 2 – no abstract is needed):

Title of Paper

Primary Diagnostic Impression

Primary Diagnosis - Listing of Criteria Met

Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity

Possible Differential Diagnoses

Secondary Diagnostic Impressions

Secondary Diagnosis 1 - Listing of Criteria Met

Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity

Possible Differential Diagnoses

Secondary Diagnosis 2 - Listing of Criteria Met

Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity

Possible Differential Diagnoses

(continue on in the same manner for additional secondary/tertiary diagnoses you find)

References

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Page 2 of 2

GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Primary Diagnostic Impression

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

24 to >21 pts

Developing

Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

21 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Main Secondary Diagnostic Impresson

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

24 to >21 pts

Developing

Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

21 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Additional Secondary Diagnostic Impressions

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences shown. Comorbidity shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

All pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences mostly shown. Comorbidity mostly shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues mostly shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis shown.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

Most pertinent criteria met shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Pertinent criteria met barely or not shown. Summary of the Prevalence and Functional Consequences barely or not shown. Comorbidity barely or not shown. Culture- and Gender-related diagnostic issues barely or not shown. Differential diagnoses related to the diagnosis barely or not shown.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Organization 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

All required elements are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper is 7-9 pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

All required elements are included and organized. There are transitions between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. The paper meets the page length requirement of 7-9 pages (not including the title and reference pages) or comes very close.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

Most required elements are included and are mostly organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The logical treatment of the topic needs improvement. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the topic. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620

Criteria Ratings Points

Style 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The paper properly uses current APA style. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The paper consistently uses current APA style with few or no exceptions. Proper headings, in-text citations, and references are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

The paper inconsistently uses current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA style. Headings, in-text citations, and references are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Sources 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources (a minimum of 1 scholarly source: the DSM 5-TR). The DSM-5-TR is referenced throughout the paper.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The Reference page meets the required number of sources (1 scholarly source: the DSM-5-TR). The DSM-5-TR is referenced throughout the paper.

7 to >6 pts

Developing

The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. The DSM-5-TR is not referenced throughout the paper.

6 to >0 pts

Below Expectations

The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. The DSM-5-TR is not referenced throughout the paper.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Total Points: 100