A6- Research Plan Overview
Follow all instructions provided
3 days ago
25
VIDEO.docx
ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
ResearchPlanOverview-RevisionGradingRubric.pdf
ResearchPlanOverviewTemplate.doc
- 747ResearchPlan2GlobalFeedback-1.pdf
- FeedbackPriorAssignment_Final-ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentMethods.docx
- Read-CreswellPothChapters8-9.pdf
VIDEO.docx
VIDEO
https://canvas.liberty.edu/courses/1035064/pages/watch-its-all-about-the-toys-qualitative-data-analysis?module_item_id=103967533
ResearchPlanOverviewAssignmentInstructions.docx
EDCO 747
Research Plan Overview Assignment Instructions
Overview
As you progress through this course, you will be developing a Research Plan Overview in outline format. The Research Plan Overview will be submitted in three stages throughout the course, with each stage revising and building upon the previous stage. The requirements for each stage of submission are described below, and the Research Plan Overview Template and Research Plan Overview Grading Rubrics for this assignment are available through Assignment Instructions.
Instructions
In addition to using the Research Plan Overview Template, you must include both a title and reference page (done in current APA format). Additionally, you must keep the headings (all text provided in black font) the same but replace the red text with your topic’s information typed in black font. All headings and subheadings must be included in your outline. Supply all of the pertinent information that the outline requests and include the uncompleted portions of the template (Methods, Appendices, etc.) in the document you submit—just leave the uncompleted portion in “red” text/font.
· Please utilize current APA Professional standards
NOTE: The Research Plan Overview Template (loosely) follows the Liberty’s Department of Community Care and Counseling’s Qualitative Dissertation Template (format); however, be aware that the format can change once you, the doctoral student, become a candidate (by finishing all coursework and successfully passing the comprehensive exam) and begin working with your dissertation committee.
Stage 1
For Stage 1, you must supply the information required for the Introduction (Section I) and the Review of Related Literature (Section II). You will continue to build the Review of Related Literature section throughout each stage of development, so be sure to supply what the red text requires.
Stage 2
Review Stage 1 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Then, supply the information required for the Methods (Section III) subheadings A, B, C, D, and E along with Appendices A and B as applicable to your design ONLY.
NOTE: Subheadings F, G and H of the Methods (Section III) AND Appendices C and D are to be completed in Stage 3—NOT in Stage 2. Also, continue to build the Review of Related Literature (Section II).
Stage 3
This stage contributes the final section of the Research Plan Overview, giving you a complete outline. Review Stage 2 of your research plan and make revisions or edits as necessary. Supply the information required for the Methods section (III), subheadings F, G, and H. Also, supply the requested information for Appendices C and D. Finally, polish the Review of Related Literature section (II), adding any final elements you think are necessary.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
ResearchPlanOverview-RevisionGradingRubric.pdf
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction Section
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Introduction and Review of Literature sections clearly and concisely depict a qualitative study.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Introduction and Review of Literature sections depict a qualitative study in a manner which is mostly clear and concise.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Introduction and Review of Literature sections vaguely depict a qualitative study in a manner which is somewhat clear and concise.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Introduction and Review of Literature sections do not depict a qualitative study.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Methods 20 to >18 pts
Advanced
Methods section is clearly qualitative with sufficient information for the completed research plan overview.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
Methods section is mostly qualitative with adequate information for the completed research plan overview.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
Methods section is somewhat qualitative with some information for the completed research plan overview.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Methods section is vaguely qualitative with some information for the completed research plan overview.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Growing Understanding
20 to >18 pts
Advanced
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research. The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections clearly show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
18 to >16 pts
Proficient
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections mostly give evidence to the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
16 to >15 pts
Developing
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections somewhat or vaguely show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
15 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The introduction, review of the literature and methods sections do not show the author’s growing understanding of qualitative research.
0 pts
Not Present
20 pts
Research Plan Overview: Revision Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
Appendices 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
Appendices include all details necessary, which can be easily written in the final Research Prospectus.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Appendices include most of the details necessary, which can be written in the final Research Prospectus.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Appendices include some of the details necessary to be written in the final Research Prospectus.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Appendices include few of the details necessary to be written in the final Research Prospectus.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Format 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All headings are present in the correct order from the template; red directions from the template are replaced with all pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Methods).
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Includes most of the headings in the correct order from the template; most of the red directions from the template have been replaced with pertinent outline/content information needed for this stage (Methods).
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Includes some of the headings in the correct order from the template; some of the red directions from the template have been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Methods).
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Does not include the headings in the correct order from the template; the red directions from the template have not been replaced with some pertinent content/outline information needed for this stage (Methods).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
References & Citations
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text match those in the paper.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; most references in-text match those in the paper.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; some references in-text match those in the paper.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
None of the citations in section 2 and on the reference page are appropriately implemented and formatted per current APA; references in-text do not match those in the paper.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Research Plan Overview: Revision Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
Criteria Ratings Points
APA & Editing 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are edited precisely for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
Most elements (including the title and reference page) of the plan are adequately edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
8 to >7 pts
Developing
Some/all elements (including the title and reference page) are poorly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
7 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Most of the elements (including the title and reference page) are improperly edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and current APA formatting.
0 pts
No Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Research Plan Overview: Revision Grading Rubric | EDCO747_B01_202630
ResearchPlanOverviewTemplate.doc
EDCO 747
Research Plan Overview Template
Name:
Stage of Completion:
I. Introduction
A. Problem Statement
1. What is/are the problem(s), issue(s), or topic(s)?
a. related literature source
b. related literature source
2. Why is it important to study? What difference can it make?
a. related literature source
b. related literature source
3. Use the phrase, “The problem is…”
B. Purpose (focus of inquiry)
1. What is the purpose of this study?
2. Start with the phrase, “The purpose of this study is…”
C. General research questions (remember that qualitative questions are usually broader and become narrowed down as you move into the actual data collection/analysis process)
1. First question
2. Second question
3. Third question
D. Research Plan
1. How will the study be conducted? Qualitative or quantitative (has to be qualitative for this class)
2. Explain why this method choice is the right one for your study
II. Review of Related Literature
A. Theoretical Framework
1. What philosophical assumption(s) led to your choice of research? (Ontological, epistemological, axiological, rhetorical, and/or methodological.) Include citations
2. What is your worldview or a theory that helped shape this study? (Biblical, Postpositivism, Constructivism, Moral Realism, Behaviorism, Critical Theory…the theory does not have to come from your textbook reading) Include citations
B. Important Thinkers/experts/theorists in this field of study (At this point in time you will just find and list them. The literature review will be interwoven, like a quilt, later.)
1. Citation (i.e., Graves, D. (2003). Writing: Teachers and children at work (20th Anniversary ed.). Exeter, NH: Heinemann.)
a. why (seminal book on how to write and writing issues)
b. why (his work is cited in almost all writing textbooks and many research articles)
2. Citation (i.e., Fulwiler, T. (1987). The journal book. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.)
a. why (considered first major thinker in the world of journal writing)
b. why (published 5 textbooks and dozens of research articles on this topic)
C. Related Research (At this point in time you will just find and list them. This section should grow with each week as you continue to look for more information. The literature review will be interwoven, like a quilt, later.)
1. Research article (must have a methodology section, results, etc.: i.e., Clarke, L. K. (1988). Invented versus traditional spelling in first graders’ writing: Effects on learning to spell and read. Research in the Teaching of English, 22(3), 281-309.
a. what is it about?
b. why important to this study? (Write key descriptors here—efficacy and writing link; teachers’ belief in students, etc. These descriptors will help you form literature review headings later and create the review of literature ‘quilt.’)
c. and so on…
2. Research article (i.e., Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.)
a. what is it about?
b. why important to this study? (Write key descriptors here—efficacy and writing link; teachers’ belief in students etc. These descriptors will help you form literature review headings later and create the review of literature ‘quilt.’)
c. and so on…
III. Methods
A. Design (approach) and Rationale
1. Which approach are you using? (Phenomenological, Case Study, Grounded Theory)
2. Why is this approach a valid design for your study?
B. Site
1. Pseudonym (made up name of the site)
2. Location (general information, i.e., “large high school in central VA”)
3. Specific demographics
4. Other pertinent information about the site
C. Participants
1. How many?
2. How selected?
3. Specific information (gender, age, etc.)
D. Role of Researcher or Personal biography (the 2nd is much more detailed…you will have to decide what you believe is more pertinent to your study)
1. Name
2. Job
3. Background information
4. Anything else that will impact how you view the data and the research surroundings (i.e., I would have to put my love affair with God)
E. Data Collection (a critical aspect of qualitative inquiry is rigorous and varied data collection techniques)
1. Method 1(i.e., interviews)
a. detail (i.e., principal at least 3 times)
b. detail (i.e., parents, snowball sampling, etc.)
2. Method 2
a. detail
b. detail
3. Method 3
a. detail
b. detail
F. Data Analysis
1. 1st Technique (i.e., open coding)
a. information about it (i.e., organizing data into…)
b. specific information on how this process will be done
c. why important (i.e., this process allows the researcher to…)
2. 2nd Technique (i.e., constant comparison method of looking at data…)
G. Trustworthiness (the reliability, dependability, and transferability information goes here)
1. 1st Technique (i.e., member checks)
a. information about it (i.e., having participants review and respond to…)
b. why important (i.e., this process increases the reliability of the study because…)
2. 2nd Technique (i.e., audit trail)
a. information about it
b. why important
3. 3rd Technique (i.e., reflexivity or memoing)
a. information about it
b. why important
c. and so on…
H. Ethical Considerations
1. potential issue and how addressed (i.e., negative results could impact school/researcher, used pseudonyms for all participants and identifiable names)
2. potential issue and how addressed
3. protection of data
References
List all references cited and formatted according to current APA edition guidelines
Appendix A Interview Questions/Guide
What are the general questions you will ask?
Questions should be opened ended; no yes/no questions
Start with an “icebreaker” to initation a conversational interview
Appendix B: Other Data Collection Procedures (e.g. Focus Groups, Document Analysis, Writing Prompts, Cognitive Representations, Observations, etc.)
In addition to interviews, how will you gather information?
Will you use a template with time stamps (every 5 minutes mark the time)?
If you conduct a focus group, what questions might you ask?
Will you use photo narrative? Cognitive representations? Participant journals?
Appendix C Timeline and Budget
Be specific. Here is an example:
August 2025—Finish coursework ($ for these items)
September 2025—Get committee together and register for dissertation course EDCO 988 ($)
Spring 2026—Defend proposal ($)
Summer 2026—Submit research plan to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval ($)
And so on…
Appendix D Consent Form
Include a robust, substantive consent form; check out Liberty’s IRB Website for example(s). Do you need one for various participants? If you need one for students/minors, it is called an ‘assent form.’
Page 1 of 4