9-2 Final Project: Submission
3 years ago
1
9-2.pdf
1milestone11.docx
2milestone11.docx
3milestone2.docx
- 4.docx
- FinalProjectGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip
9-2.pdf
9-2 Final Project: Submission
Submit your final paper, making sure to incorporate your instructor's feedback on your rough draft.
Submit your assignment here. Make sure you’ve included all the required elements by reviewing the guidelines and rubric.
3milestone2.docx
PSY 530 Final Project Milestone Two: Similarities and Differences Table Learning Aid
Your Classic Study: Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: A lesson in the power of situation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(30), B6–B7. https://www.proquest.com/docview/214660796?accountid=3783&parentSessionId=s4PjKwhL8HOuala3OnNABJX2b1S%2BFvBLk8ppmNBDaCc%3D ___________________________________________________________________
Your More Recent Study: Zia, M. Q., Naveed, M., Bashir, M. A., & Shamsi, A. F. (2020). The interaction of situational factors on individual factors and self-development. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(4/5), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-10-2019-0172
______________________________________________________________
|
Classic and Modern Study Questions |
Responses for Classic Study |
Responses for Modern Study |
Similarities and Differences Between Your Two Responses |
|
Citation for studies in APA style
|
Classic Study (Zimbardo, 2007) |
Recent Study (Zia et al., 2020) |
N/A |
|
What is the research question or hypothesis in this study?
|
Influence of situational factors on behavior. |
The influence of both internal and external forces on personal growth. |
Both look at how external circumstances affect behavior and personal growth. |
|
Name two studies referenced in this article that greatly contributed to the main theme of this article.
|
Group dynamics, Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments, anonymity and aggression. |
Evolution of self-development, role of technology, cost-effectiveness of informal learning programs. |
Both studies refer to existing research to build their context. |
|
What type of research method was used in this study? Correlation? Experiment?
|
Experiment (Stanford prison experiment) |
Survey and structural equation modeling |
Both employ different research methods (experiment vs. survey/SEM). |
|
Were the measures used in your study reliable and valid? Explain.
|
Researchers followed the best research practices making the study reliable and valid. |
The use of SEM approach leads to the validity and reliability of the study outcome. |
Both the two studies are reliable and valid since the research practices used are acceptable and outcome being relevant. |
|
What were the main results/conclusions in this study?
|
Situational factors significantly influenced behavior. |
Self-improvement is a function of both genetics and environment. These associations are moderated by factors such as empowerment and job autonomy. |
Both studies present findings related to the influence of situational factors. |
|
Did this study have ethical problems? If so, name them.
|
Ethical concerns due to severe and unethical behaviors observed in the Stanford prison experiment. The experiment had an impact on the mental health of the participants posing an ethical concern. |
There were no critical ethical concern highlighted in the article. |
The classic study had well-documented ethical problems; the recent study doesn't mention them. |
|
How does this research help improve people’s social well-being/social welfare?
|
The article drives home the point that context is crucial to understanding human behavior. |
The article argues that firms may help employees grow by giving them more control over their work and other aspects of their lives. |
Both studies offer insights that can impact social well-being, one through behavior understanding and the other through self-development in organizations. |
|
What influence did this study have on the everyday lives of people in society?
|
Zimbardo's study raised awareness of the power of situational factors, influencing discussions about ethics and the treatment of participants in psychological experiments. |
The research by Zia et al. may change policies and procedures in the workplace for the better by highlighting the significance of providing employees with opportunities for personal growth and responsibility in the workplace. |
Both studies have the potential to influence society, one by raising ethical concerns and the other by suggesting ways to enhance workplace environments. |
|
How has this study changed the way you view the world? Did this study affect you personally?
|
Zimbardo's study is a classic example of the ethical and psychological considerations in research, making one reflect on the potential consequences of situational factors. |
Zia et al.'s study highlights the importance of self-development and the role of the work environment, which can be personally relevant for career development and growth. |
Both studies can lead to personal reflection, one on ethical conduct, and the other on personal development and career choices. |
image1.jpeg
- CALCULAS
- SCI 230 Week 6 Assignments
- f n sb
- PROF SIDLE ONLY
- 2) Much has been written on the self-perceived ability of individuals to change the nature of their lives (Rotter, 1990; Judge & Bono, 2001). While many psychologists interpret ideas such as "locus of control" and "self-efficacy" as individually variable
- Ecalder
- MBA 5101 Test 5
- Assignment 1 and 2
- Multiply or divide. Write the answer in simplest form. State any restrictions on the variables. 5a/5a+5 ⢠10a+10/a
- EDU 692 Week 3 Analyzing Cultural Relevance in Instruction