9-1 Discussion
3 years ago
1
9-1Discussion.pdf
Resources.zip
DiscussionGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip
ContemporaryEthicsTopicsandHumanRights.zip
9-1Discussion.pdf
9-1 Discussion: Ethics of Moral Bio Enhancement
Imagine you are a therapist living in the not-so-distant future. A moral bioenhancement pill called Moralzac is currently in clinical trials to obtain FDA approval. You have already read about moral bioenhancement in peer-reviewed journals and are worried about the ethical implications of this pill.
If this pill were to be approved by the FDA, would you prescribe it to a patient? Why or why not?
Explain how you might use the eight-step ethical decision-making model to come to your conclusion.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.
Resources.zip
Reading and Resources8.html
|
|
Required Resources |
Reading: What Drives Public Attitudes Towards Moral Bioenhancement and Why It Matters: An Exploratory Study This article explores the issue of moral bioenhancement, considering that moral behavior and rationality are part of human behavior, to explain public attitudes toward moral bioenhancement.
Reading: Table 3 Arguments For and Against Moral Bioenhancement, Presented in the Reviewed Literature The table presents an overview of the clusters of arguments and sub-arguments identified both for and against moral bioenhancement.
DiscussionGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip
Discussion Guidelines and Rubric.html
PSY 570 Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
You will write an initial post (2–3-paragraph response) to the discussion and reply to at least two posts during the week outside of your initial post thread. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. A response needs to be respectful and substantive, indicating a response with depth beyond “I agree” or “I disagree.” Your participation posts must also demonstrate greater critical thinking beyond reframing another post.
Recommended best practices:
Initial post (1):
- Composed of two to three paragraphs unless otherwise noted
- In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Considers material (course content, other discussions, etc.) from the current module and previous modules
Response posts (2):
- Reply to at least two other classmates outside of your own initial post thread
- In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Must have more depth and critical thinking than simply “I agree” or “you are wrong”
Discussion Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student clearly understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates appropriate application of concepts (100%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates application of concepts (90%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student struggled with the ethical concepts presented in class (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 35 |
| Timeliness | N/A | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (70%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
| Critical Thinking | Student demonstrates critical thinking with the initial and response posts. Critical elements are addressed in a comprehensive manner, tying the response back to the literature presented in the week (100%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post that demonstrates a working knowledge of the literature presented from the week; response posts demonstrate critical analysis (90%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post, but does not make connections to the material presented in the course work from the week; response posts indicate challenges with critical thinking (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 25 |
| Writing (Mechanics/ Citations) | No errors related to organization, grammar and style, or citations (100%) | Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (90%) | Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (70%) | Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0%) | 20 |
| Participation | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts which are substantive, respectful, and add something new to the discussion (100%) | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts. A majority of the posts are substantive and respectful to fellow learners (90%) | Student does not submit the required quantity or quality of participation posts (70%) | Student does not submit any participation posts to fellow learners for the discussion question (0%) | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
ContemporaryEthicsTopicsandHumanRights.zip
Module Overview19.html
Contemporary Ethics Topics and Human Rights
A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.
—Albert Camus
Figure 9.1 (wyndhamworldwide.com)
We study ethics in order to integrate our understanding of personal and professional morality as applied to serving people in specific settings such as counseling, research, consulting, teaching, and advising.
Module Nine explores two main themes. We take a look at technological advances and ponder our ethical stance on the future-based ability to engineer morality and other behaviors. Can or should we attempt to change the way people are? Is this at the core of what psychology is about? Additionally, we will take a look at the risks involved in being a professional in the field of psychology. There are very real risks associated with working in the field of psychology. There are personal risks that come by way of compassion fatigue, burnout, and secondary posttraumatic stress. Psychologists can be stalked, assaulted, and murdered. There are professional risks such as loss of a license to practice. And, there are combinations of risks that affect the psychologist, personally and professionally, such as malpractice lawsuits.
Let’s take a look at some examples of advances that began with an innovative thought. Keep in mind that many ethical mistakes began with a great idea. Those great ideas garnered support and in no time the energy to finish a pursuit overrode the potential perils to human beings or other animals. We seek innovation, we aspire toward greatness, and yet we must consider all ethical ramifications over innovation, prestige, status, and greatness. Take the case of the atomic bomb dropped by the United States on Hiroshima, Japan during World War II. Many of you are likely familiar with the Manhattan Project. Albert Einstein (from Nazi Germany) and Enrico Fermi (from Fascist Italy) were two scientists who fled their countries of origin. They were aware of the development of atomic technology in Germany and feared the Germans would bring the atomic bomb into fruition. After migrating to the United States, they and others worked in a think tank that was collectively referred to as the Manhattan Project. In time the atomic bomb, by way of the innovation of nuclear fission, became a viable and dangerous weapon. Einstein later regretted steps he took toward the development of the bomb, indicating that he would not have let the United States know of preliminary atomic technology had he known a bomb would be developed and used for the destruction of people. Sometimes innovation in technology, although a brilliant step for science, becomes a stain on humanity and ethical choice.
Behavioral Therapy
The beginning of behavioral therapy involved what was known as behavioral modification. In order to extinguish an unwanted behavior in a human being, there were steps taken therapeutically to effect change. These included positive and negative reinforcement and the presence of punishment. This punishment could assume the form of restraints, electric shock, ridicule, and denial of basic needs. Behavioral modification has evolved since its origin around 1911 and is now the cornerstone of popular cognitive behavioral therapies. In the beginning, however, behavioral therapy was highly controversial. Some examples of historical and contemporary ethical controversy resulting from this therapy include:
- Sexual aversion therapy was developed for use with homosexuals. It was determined to be dangerous and yet was used until the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) removed homosexuality as a disorder in 1974. This 1973 APA position statement discusses the DSM II and homosexuality.
- Aversion therapy was and is still used with children and teens labeled as sexually deviant. Methods such as olfactory aversion, which involves smelling noxious scents such as ammonia, were popular forms of treatment. Skim through this 1970 research abstract and this 2012 research abstract and note the use of electrical aversion therapy in each study.
- Shock collars were developed for use with dogs to teach obedience to commands. Animal-rights groups have protested this form of control as well as choke collars. There have been instances of parents abusing children by placing the dog-designed shock collars on them. This Huffington Post article provides a short history of how shock collars have been used on humans.
Technological Advances and Medicine
In medicine, the development of the drug Antabuse was seen as a miracle for the treatment of alcoholism as an addiction. If an individual drinks alcohol while on Antabuse, he or she will become violently ill. A link to a 1970 journal article on alcohol aversion therapy is provided. Notice the cavalier attitude about the use of harm and aversion. Antabuse is still being used today for the treatment of alcoholism.
Shock aversion therapy was developed for use with pedophiles and anyone who was determined to be a sexual deviant. Throughout time, the definition of who is a sexual deviant has changed. Herein lies one of the problems. The penile plethysmograph was developed as a device that fits over the penis. The “offending clients” would be shown images of a pornographic nature. If they became aroused, it became grounds for belief the deviant would engage in re-offending behavior.
Political and Governmental
Interrogation and torture of detainees in jails, prisons, and at the Guantanamo Bay detention center make for shocking news. The rationale often used, which does not follow the eight-step model we discuss in this course, is that hurting a few in order to protect thousands justifies the inhumane treatment.
In summary, we will continue to consider what new technologies have to offer our field. Our job as psychologists is to stay current in developments in our field and allied fields. We welcome innovation, but not at the cost of eroding our ethical beliefs or our moral compass. It is an honor and challenge to work within the field of psychology. It is a profession that offers hope, brings inspiration, and creates trust and healing. It is also a field of work where any significant misstep can have enormous human ramifications. Lives can become altered, lives may be lost, suffering can be counted by emotional scars, and generations later necessary healing may not have taken place. You are encouraged to go forward with mindfulness as you consider your professional and personal choices, while also considering the choices of others.