8-1 Discussion:
3 years ago
1
8-1Discussion.pdf
Resources.zip
ProsocialBehavior.zip
GraduateDiscussionRubric.html.zip
8-1Discussion.pdf
8-1 Discussion: Variables of Helping Behavior
After reading the three articles on helping behavior, what do you think are the main variables that enhance or reduce a person's chance of getting help when needed? Are there any ethical concerns that arise when using research to test these variables and their effect on helping?
What might you do in a given situation to enhance your chances of getting help?
Use research from the Shapiro Library to support your claims.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.
Resources.zip
Reading and Resources17.html
|
|
Required Resources |
Library Article: High Cost Helping Scenario: The Role of Empathy, Prosocial Reasoning and Moral Disengagement on Helping Behavior This article provides an overview of the key variables that predict helping behavior in real-life situations.
Library Article: Racial Differences in Helping Behaviors: The Role of Respect, Safety, and Identification This article examines the variables that exist in regards to predicting helping behaviors among different racial groups.
Article: 'From Jerusalem to Jericho': A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping BehaviorThis is a classic study of the variables predicting helping behavior that was completed by the two researchers that brought the study of helping behaviors into the study of social psychology.
Library Article: Not (Entirely) Guilty: The Role of Co-offenders in Diffusing Responsibility for Crime This Shapiro Library article examines the variables that exist regarding predicting helping behaviors and diffusion of responsibility in adolescents.
Library Article: College Students’ Peer-helping Behaviors and Stigma of Seeking Help: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model This Shapiro Library article is an excellent review of helping behavior and help-seeking behavior as impacted by race and gender.
ProsocialBehavior.zip
Module Overview7.html
Prosocial Behavior
Empathy and Helping Behavior
Many students state that they want to go into psychology because they want to help people. Does this sound like you? What is it that makes some people more likely to help others? One variable that is predictive of helping behavior is empathy. There are three components of empathy: perspective taking, personal distress, and empathetic concern. Perspective taking is a purely cognitive form of empathy as it denotes that one person is able to understand another person’s situation. Personal distress occurs when one person truly feels another person’s pain. Empathetic concern is when one person recognizes another person’s suffering and feels a concern for them. Being able to feel another person’s personal distress is one of the best predictors of helping behavior, because if a person feels another’s distress, they will want to help the other person, in order to reduce the distress that both of them now feel (Kassin et al., 2021).
Positive Mood and Helping Behavior Apart from a person’s level of empathy, being in a positive mood may also affect people’s level of helping behavior (Kassin et al., 2021). Research has conclusively shown that people who are in a good mood are more likely to help others. For example, if a person is in a good mood because they just found money on the street, that person is now more likely to help a stranger carry their groceries, as long as that positive mood is still present (Kassin et al., 2021).
Reciprocity
Positive mood is a very simple thing that affects your level of helping others. Another simple thing that affects helping behavior is reciprocity. Reciprocity means that when someone does a favor for you, you are more likely to do a favor for that person who helped you (Cialdini and Griskevicius, 2019). Researchers are not sure if reciprocity is something that is wired into our genes, or something that we just learn throughout our lives. Either way, research shows that it is a very powerful technique. So, if you think that you might need a favor from someone in the future, now is the time to do a favor for that person.
Helping in an Emergency Situation
Does a person’s immediate physical environment affect their likelihood to help another person? The answer is most definitely “yes,” when the helping behavior occurs in an emergency situation (Kassin et al., 2021). If a person is injured and lying on the ground, the fewer the people that witness the injury, the more likely the injured individual is to get help. This is called the bystander effect. This theory was developed after the murder of Kitty Genovese in the late 1960s in New York. Kitty was attacked outside of her apartment building in an attempted robbery. She fought off her attacker for a while. After 30 minutes, however, she lost the battle and died outside her apartment building. The strange thing about this situation is that a follow-up investigation of the murder found that 38 people in her building had heard the attack as it was happening. Nobody came down to help. Nobody called the police. The fewer people present in an emergency situation, the more likely you are to get help. The more people present, not only will it take longer to get help, but the chances of you getting help becomes greatly reduced. The reason that this occurs is known as diffusion of responsibility. It is the simple idea that if more people are able to help in a situation, every other person may assume that someone else can help, so that they do not have to get involved. Are there other issues that impact diffusion of responsibility (Rowan et al., 2022)?
Being able to help others is a powerful skill that plays an important role in our society. Predicting if or when a person will help another person requires a close analysis of one’s personality as well as the situation where the help is needed. Learned social skills and gender may also influence helping behavior and bystander intervention (Jenkins & Nickerson, 2019).
References
Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2019). Social influence. In Finkel, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2019). Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 157–178). Oxford University Press. Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2019). Bystander intervention in bullying: Role of social skills and gender. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 141–166. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1177/0272431617735652 Kassin, S., Fein, S., & Markus, H. R. (2021). Social Psychology (11th ed.). Cengage. Rowan, Z. R., Kan, E., Frick, P. J., & Cauffman, E. (2022). Not (entirely) guilty: The role of co-offenders in diffusing responsibility for crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(4), 415–448. https://doi-org.ezproxy.snhu.edu/10.1177/00224278211046256
GraduateDiscussionRubric.html.zip
Graduate Discussion Rubric.html
Graduate Discussion Rubric
Overview
Your active participation in the discussions is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions will help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. These discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask questions, and gain insight from your peers and instructor.
Directions
For each discussion, you must create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, do the following:
- Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs.
- In Module One, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular sources.
For your response posts, do the following:
- Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post thread.
- In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt.
Discussion Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehension | Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) | Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail (90%) | Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (70%) | Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) | 20 |
| Timeliness | N/A | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (70%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
| Engagement | Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) | Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (90%) | Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (70%) | Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) | 20 |
| Critical Thinking | Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (100%) | Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence (90%) | Draws logical conclusions (70%) | Does not draw logical conclusions (0%) | 30 |
| Writing (Mechanics) | Initial post and responses are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) | Initial post and responses are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (90%) | Initial post and responses are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (70%) | Initial post and responses are not understandable and do not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) | 20 |
| Total: | 100% |