8-1 Discussion
3 years ago
1
8-1Discussion.pdf
Required.zip
ChallengingWorkSettings.zip
Rubric.zip
8-1Discussion.pdf
8-1 Discussion: Ethical Challenges in Different Settings
As you consider potential places of employment for the future, think about work settings that might require special ethical considerations.
Describe three work settings that present special ethical challenges or considerations. Explain why these settings would be challenging or additional considerations should be taken.
In response to your peers, give at least one example of a conflict outside of one of the work settings that could have potential repercussions at work. Discuss how these work settings could be affected by behaviors or personal choices outside of the work environment.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.
Required.zip
Reading and Resources7.html
|
|
Required Resources |
Textbook: Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions: Standards and Cases, Chapter 15 Chapter 15 addresses challenging work settings and a professional’s responsibility to understand basic ethical considerations as well as the special characteristics and challenges entailed in certain environments where you may deliver services.
Reading: Women Act More Ethically Than Men When Representing Themselves—But Not When Representing Others This Shapiro Library article discusses how people who act on behalf of others are influenced significantly by the values and perceived expectations of those they’re representing, specifically when it comes to acting ethically.
ChallengingWorkSettings.zip
Module Overview18.html
Challenging Work Settings
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
—Martin Luther King, Jr.
Image 8.1 (democracynow.org)
There are certain settings that require special skill sets, training, and a finely tuned ethical compass. In Module Eight, we will explore some of these settings and some of the problems professionals face in challenging work environments.
Some basic considerations to keep in mind as you read the text involve seemingly simple concepts, such as who the client is. This appears simple to do, yet professionals are often faced with needing to clarify this beginning element. Consider a situation where parents come in and want you to see their daughter, who is 11 and dealing with anorexia. The parents are hostile, angry, and anxious. You surmise the parents need help, the girl needs help, and you know there are four other children in the household. Who is the client in this case? This answer will come from a couple of different ethical strategies. For one, it depends on what type of therapist you are. If you work with children, adults, and families, you have one set of choices. If you work with adults only, you have another set of choices. Still, if you work only with children, there are more choices. Secondly, you need to identify the client in order to bill insurance. Is the client the whole family, the child, the parents, or one of the parents? These are some of the complexities involved in the daily practice of therapists.
Skill sets are another consideration. One needs certain skill sets for certain types of psychological work. It is unethical to work outside one’s scope of expertise. These are just a few of the issues you will read about in Module Eight.
Challenging settings are another matter. Professional psychologists work in many settings: in private practice, group practice, corporations, and the military; as consultants to many organizations; as academics and faculty; as supervisors of training in psychology; as researchers in academic and other settings; as school psychologists; as child and protective service providers; in hospitals, hospice organizations, pastoral settings, the courts, prison settings, on death row, and internment camps; with the CIA and FBI; and so on. As you can imagine, not all of these are easy settings to work in. To do so requires well-honed ethics, special skill attainment, and a conviction to stay on top of your craft in psychology.
This module will give you an opportunity to explore torture and the participation of psychologists in the development of torture designs for detainees. We will also look at the psychologist in and outside of work settings. Do psychologists have a responsibility to conduct themselves ethically at work and at home? The answer to that is yes.
References
Tuchsen, L. (2010, March 16). The Right Way [Image]. Flickr. https://openverse.org/image/5d379003-7eef-443e-ad62-6457931fd7b9?q=right%20way. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0). March 16, 2020.
Course Documents/Module Eight Overview.jpg
Rubric.zip
Discussion Guidelines and Rubric.html
PSY 570 Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
You will write an initial post (2–3-paragraph response) to the discussion and reply to at least two posts during the week outside of your initial post thread. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. A response needs to be respectful and substantive, indicating a response with depth beyond “I agree” or “I disagree.” Your participation posts must also demonstrate greater critical thinking beyond reframing another post.
Recommended best practices:
Initial post (1):
- Composed of two to three paragraphs unless otherwise noted
- In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Considers material (course content, other discussions, etc.) from the current module and previous modules
Response posts (2):
- Reply to at least two other classmates outside of your own initial post thread
- In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Must have more depth and critical thinking than simply “I agree” or “you are wrong”
Discussion Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student clearly understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates appropriate application of concepts (100%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates application of concepts (90%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student struggled with the ethical concepts presented in class (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 35 |
| Timeliness | N/A | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (70%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
| Critical Thinking | Student demonstrates critical thinking with the initial and response posts. Critical elements are addressed in a comprehensive manner, tying the response back to the literature presented in the week (100%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post that demonstrates a working knowledge of the literature presented from the week; response posts demonstrate critical analysis (90%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post, but does not make connections to the material presented in the course work from the week; response posts indicate challenges with critical thinking (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 25 |
| Writing (Mechanics/ Citations) | No errors related to organization, grammar and style, or citations (100%) | Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (90%) | Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (70%) | Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0%) | 20 |
| Participation | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts which are substantive, respectful, and add something new to the discussion (100%) | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts. A majority of the posts are substantive and respectful to fellow learners (90%) | Student does not submit the required quantity or quality of participation posts (70%) | Student does not submit any participation posts to fellow learners for the discussion question (0%) | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
- Employee Performance @someone who comprehends the directions given
- michael.smith - Fate or Free Will?
- assigment 2
- Law
- Discussion Response #1 (NURS6351): Addressing Diversity to Promote Effective Learning Experiences
- Assuming that a driver with a visual acuity of 20/20 can read a road sign within his area of vision at a distance of 50 ft for each inch of letter height, prepare a table with required letter heights for signs 100 ft, 500 ft, and 1000 ft for drivers with
- ASSINGMENT 2 ATOC
- Homework Algorithms
- ACC 560 Week 3 Discussion Tutorial
- Business Plan