3-2
jan29
3 years ago
1
files (4)TenClassicStudiesWithShapiroLibraryReferences1.pdf
3-2FinalProjectMilestoneOne_StudySelectionandSummary.pdf
MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip
ten_classic_studies_learning_aid.pdf
TenClassicStudiesWithShapiroLibraryReferences1.pdf
PSY 530 Ten Classic Studies With Shapiro Library References
1. Stanford Prison Experiment: Phillip Zimbardo Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: A lesson in the power of situation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(30), B6–B7.
https://www.proquest.com/docview/214660796?accountid=3783&parentSessionId=s4PjKwhL8H Ouala3OnNABJX2b1S%2BFvBLk8ppmNBDaCc%3D
3-2FinalProjectMilestoneOne_StudySelectionandSummary.pdf
3-2 Final Project Milestone One: Study Selection and Summary
Submit the first milestone of your final project.
Submit your assignment here. Make sure you’ve included all the required elements by reviewing the guidelines and rubri
MilestoneOneGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip
Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric.html
PSY 530 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
This milestone will help you get started on the final project by selecting a classic and more current study and writing a detailed summary of each.
Prompt
First, choose a classic study from the Ten Classic Studies Learning Aid located in your Reading and Resources. Second, find a more current study on the same general topic that was conducted and published in the past 10 years. For example, you could choose Milgram’s obedience study AND choose a modern study on obedience (for example, obedience in the workplace, military, or perhaps another setting).
Summarize each of the two studies in detail. Include the reference for each study. Your summary for each article should include information about the literature review, research question or hypothesis, methodology, results, and the conclusion.
What to Submit
This summary should be a paper of about 2 double-spaced pages, submitted in Microsoft Word, with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and all sources cited in APA format within the document and in the reference list.
Milestone One Rubric
| Criteria | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources and Citation | Correctly cites selected studies using APA style with the document and in the reference list | Cites selected studies but does not properly apply APA style | Does not provide citations | 15 |
| Research Question or Hypothesis | Accurately identifies the research questions or hypothesis for the selected studies | States research questions or hypothesis for the selected studies in a manner that is cursory, inaccurate, or incomplete | Does not state research questions or hypotheses for the selected studies | 15 |
| Literature Review | Accurately summarizes the literature review for each study, including the most essential past research | Summarizes the literature review for each study, but in a manner that is inaccurate or does not reference essential past research | Does not summarize the literature review for each study | 15 |
| Research Methodology | Accurately describes the social psychological approach or methodology used in the selected studies | Describes the social psychological approach used in the selected studies but in a manner that is cursory or inaccurate | Does not describe the social psychological methodology or approach used in the selected studies | 15 |
| Research Results | Accurately describes the results or findings of the selected studies | Describes the results or findings of the selected studies but in a manner that is cursory or inaccurate | Does not describe the results or findings of the selected studies | 15 |
| Research Conclusions | Accurately describes the conclusions reached in each selected study | Describes the conclusions reached in each study but the description is cursory or inaccurate | Does not describe the conclusions reached in each study | 15 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
ten_classic_studies_learning_aid.pdf
PSY 530 Ten Classic Studies With Shapiro Library References
1. Stanford Prison Experiment: Phillip Zimbardo
Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: A lesson in the power of situation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(30), B6–B7.
Or Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison.
International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69–97.
2. Obedience to Authority: Stanley Milgram Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human
Relations, 18(1), 57–76.
3. Cognitive Dissonance and Insufficient Rewards: Leon Festinger Festinger, L. (1961). The psychological effects of insufficient rewards. American Psychologist,
16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045112
4. Imitation of Aggression: Albert Bandura Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048687
5. Bystander Effect, Helping Behavior: John Latane and Bibb Darley Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of
responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
6. Conformity to a Majority: Solomon Asch
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1–70.
7. Groupthink: Irving Janis
Janis, I. L. (1973). Groupthink and group dynamics: A social psychological analysis of defective policy decisions. Policy Studies Journal, 2(1), 19–26.
8. Evolution and Sexual Strategies: David Buss
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–32.
9. Intergroup Conflict and Prejudice: Muzafer Sherif
Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 349–356.
10. The Halo Effect: Richard Nisbett
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256.
- ACC - Prepare journal entries Solution Worksheet
- MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES
- physics
- Team and Leadership db unit 1
- essay
- Americans break down into three basic groups
- Why is a z score a standard score? Why can standard scores be used to compare scores from different distributions?
- Criminal justice system
- paper
- Annotated Bibliography
