1456 | Biology homework help

Untitleddocument31.docx

Assignment Instructions(I will attach the readings，I attached two of them but there is one more u can find it online,Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (MIT version)This is the name of the reading)

The Week 3 Content Analysis assignment is designed to build understanding of course content by asking you to make connections between readings, lectures, and course themes.

In your Content Analysis (CA), only use evidence from assigned readings, lectures, and sections in your responses. Include in-text citations for the sources used, whether videos, readings, weekly notes, etc. Avoid including lengthy quotes. Instead, paraphrase and explain the relevance and significance of the selected passages or video segments in your own words as much as possible. When paraphrasing or summarizing a source, also cite it with an in-text citation. For briefer quotations, use quotation marks when citing words that are not your own. For in-text citations, give the author’s name and the page number, if there is one. You do not need a Works Cited page because you only use course resources.

Word count: 1000 (Max)

To reference a lecture, please include the lecture number and date. Example: (Lecture 8)

· To reference an assigned reading, please include the author and page number: Example: (La Mattrie, 7).

· Minimum of 4 references, including at least one from the lectures. Please note that the minimum of 4 references are for BOTH questions (in total). Also, note that your four references should be from 4 different sources. So, you should avoid quoting different parts of the same reference (a lecture or an assigned reading) to have it count.

· Make sure you properly quote your sources.

· You MUST submit by the deadline, no exceptions.

Due: Tuesday 8/20/24 by 11:59 PM

Academic Integrity: MMW expects all assignments to be the product of original individual work for the course. Assignments completed and submitted with integrity give credit where credit is due and honestly acknowledge others’ work by adhering to standards of citations, assignment requirements for source materials, and University guidelines. For more information, see the MMW Formatting and Submission Guidelines

Links to an external site.

, MMW GenAI Policy

Links to an external site.

, and the Policy on Integrity of Scholarship . All assignments will be submitted to Turnitin.com, an academic integrity software.

Late Policy: Assignments submitted after the due date will result in a 1-step deduction on the grade scale for each day it is late. Assignments submitted 10+ days after the deadline will automatically receive an F (59/100). Assignments not submitted by the start of the final exam time will receive a 0/100.

Please note that you must submit this assignment as a .doc, .docx, or a .pdf file. When you are ready to submit your assignment, click on the submit button and upload your assignment file. Submit the MMW GenAI Use Acknowledgement

Links to an external site.

to the appropriate submission page .

Assignment Prompt

Choose only 2 out of 3 questions:

1. What are the conclusions of “Man and the Machine”? Do you think La Mattrie’s argument is in tension with the Christian Church and the philosophical tradition of his time? Explain why or why not. Provide evidence from the text and lecture material in your answers.

2. How does Immanuel Kant’s conception of human being in Lectures on Anthropology compare to his essay on “What is Enlightenment”? Is he advocating a universal conception of humanity? If not, explain. Provide evidence from the text and lecture material in your answers.

3. During Candide’s travels to South America, how does Voltaire depict the native population? Accordingly, what is the significance of his account of “the country of Eldorado” in Candide? Provide evidence from the text and lecture material in your answers.

Rubric

Content Analysis Rubric

Criteria	Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content + Argument • Answers the prompt question(s) accurately, making an argument supported by course materials, including lecture and assigned readings • Provides specific and relevant textual evidence from required course readings to support assertions when needed
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources and Citations • References and makes use of the required texts • Cites sources in correct MLA format when necessary • Relevant sources used to answer the prompt question
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Structure and Format • Responds to all of the prompt • Adheres to required length • Clearly expresses ideas and information
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Overall Grading Criteria: A range: Advanced; meets all of the above criteria at an exceptionally high level B range: Proficient; meets most of the above criteria at a high level with some issues (minor to more serious) that interfere with full realization of goals C range: Competent; meets most of the above criteria at a level that demonstrates competency but has several issues that interfere with full realization of goals D: Raises significant concerns about assignment comprehension, citation conventions, text/source comprehension, and/or summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting sources F: Outside the scope of the prompt or course. Missing citations, errors in citation, or use of sources rise to the level of academic misconduct. Recycles research/writing from an assignment from another course 0: No submission; academic misconduct

Untitleddocument31.docx

Assignment Instructions(I will attach the readings，I attached two of them but there is one more u can find it online,Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (MIT version)This is the name of the reading)

The Week 3 Content Analysis assignment is designed to build understanding of course content by asking you to make connections between readings, lectures, and course themes.

In your Content Analysis (CA), only use evidence from assigned readings, lectures, and sections in your responses. Include in-text citations for the sources used, whether videos, readings, weekly notes, etc. Avoid including lengthy quotes. Instead, paraphrase and explain the relevance and significance of the selected passages or video segments in your own words as much as possible. When paraphrasing or summarizing a source, also cite it with an in-text citation. For briefer quotations, use quotation marks when citing words that are not your own. For in-text citations, give the author’s name and the page number, if there is one. You do not need a Works Cited page because you only use course resources.

Word count: 1000 (Max)

To reference a lecture, please include the lecture number and date. Example: (Lecture 8)

· To reference an assigned reading, please include the author and page number: Example: (La Mattrie, 7).

· Minimum of 4 references, including at least one from the lectures. Please note that the minimum of 4 references are for BOTH questions (in total). Also, note that your four references should be from 4 different sources. So, you should avoid quoting different parts of the same reference (a lecture or an assigned reading) to have it count.

· Make sure you properly quote your sources.

· You MUST submit by the deadline, no exceptions.

Due: Tuesday 8/20/24 by 11:59 PM

Academic Integrity: MMW expects all assignments to be the product of original individual work for the course. Assignments completed and submitted with integrity give credit where credit is due and honestly acknowledge others’ work by adhering to standards of citations, assignment requirements for source materials, and University guidelines. For more information, see the MMW Formatting and Submission Guidelines

Links to an external site.

, MMW GenAI Policy

Links to an external site.

, and the Policy on Integrity of Scholarship . All assignments will be submitted to Turnitin.com, an academic integrity software.

Late Policy: Assignments submitted after the due date will result in a 1-step deduction on the grade scale for each day it is late. Assignments submitted 10+ days after the deadline will automatically receive an F (59/100). Assignments not submitted by the start of the final exam time will receive a 0/100.

Please note that you must submit this assignment as a .doc, .docx, or a .pdf file. When you are ready to submit your assignment, click on the submit button and upload your assignment file. Submit the MMW GenAI Use Acknowledgement

Links to an external site.

to the appropriate submission page .

Assignment Prompt

Choose only 2 out of 3 questions:

1. What are the conclusions of “Man and the Machine”? Do you think La Mattrie’s argument is in tension with the Christian Church and the philosophical tradition of his time? Explain why or why not. Provide evidence from the text and lecture material in your answers.

2. How does Immanuel Kant’s conception of human being in Lectures on Anthropology compare to his essay on “What is Enlightenment”? Is he advocating a universal conception of humanity? If not, explain. Provide evidence from the text and lecture material in your answers.

3. During Candide’s travels to South America, how does Voltaire depict the native population? Accordingly, what is the significance of his account of “the country of Eldorado” in Candide? Provide evidence from the text and lecture material in your answers.

Rubric

Content Analysis Rubric

Criteria	Ratings
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content + Argument • Answers the prompt question(s) accurately, making an argument supported by course materials, including lecture and assigned readings • Provides specific and relevant textual evidence from required course readings to support assertions when needed
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources and Citations • References and makes use of the required texts • Cites sources in correct MLA format when necessary • Relevant sources used to answer the prompt question
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Structure and Format • Responds to all of the prompt • Adheres to required length • Clearly expresses ideas and information
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Overall Grading Criteria: A range: Advanced; meets all of the above criteria at an exceptionally high level B range: Proficient; meets most of the above criteria at a high level with some issues (minor to more serious) that interfere with full realization of goals C range: Competent; meets most of the above criteria at a level that demonstrates competency but has several issues that interfere with full realization of goals D: Raises significant concerns about assignment comprehension, citation conventions, text/source comprehension, and/or summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting sources F: Outside the scope of the prompt or course. Missing citations, errors in citation, or use of sources rise to the level of academic misconduct. Recycles research/writing from an assignment from another course 0: No submission; academic misconduct