10-1 Discussion: Everyday Ethics
3 years ago
1
10-1Discussion-EverydayEthics.pdf
ReadingandResources9.html.zip
DiscussionGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip
EthicsinEverydayLife.zip
10-1Discussion-EverydayEthics.pdf
10-1 Discussion: Everyday Ethics
Give an example of an ethical conflict requiring ethical decision making in your everyday life outside the work environment. Reflect upon the course outcomes and concepts you have learned in this course. Has this newly acquired knowledge contributed to rethinking your daily decisions? How? If not, share some details as to why your daily decisions may remain the same.
In your responses to peers, share how you would make a decision as it relates to your peers' conflicts.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.
ReadingandResources9.html.zip
Reading and Resources9.html
|
|
Required Resources |
Reading: Research: We Make More Virtuous Choices When Using Pen and Paper As more decisions that used to be made on paper are now being made via digital devices, this change could impact how those decisions are made. This Shapiro Library article describes how people are less likely to choose the virtuous or responsible option when deciding on a digital device than when using paper forms.
DiscussionGuidelinesandRubric.html1.zip
Discussion Guidelines and Rubric.html
PSY 570 Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
You will write an initial post (2–3-paragraph response) to the discussion and reply to at least two posts during the week outside of your initial post thread. These discussions offer you the opportunity to express your own thoughts, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. A response needs to be respectful and substantive, indicating a response with depth beyond “I agree” or “I disagree.” Your participation posts must also demonstrate greater critical thinking beyond reframing another post.
Recommended best practices:
Initial post (1):
- Composed of two to three paragraphs unless otherwise noted
- In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Considers material (course content, other discussions, etc.) from the current module and previous modules
Response posts (2):
- Reply to at least two other classmates outside of your own initial post thread
- In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Must have more depth and critical thinking than simply “I agree” or “you are wrong”
Discussion Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student clearly understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates appropriate application of concepts (100%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates application of concepts (90%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student struggled with the ethical concepts presented in class (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 35 |
| Timeliness | N/A | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (70%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
| Critical Thinking | Student demonstrates critical thinking with the initial and response posts. Critical elements are addressed in a comprehensive manner, tying the response back to the literature presented in the week (100%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post that demonstrates a working knowledge of the literature presented from the week; response posts demonstrate critical analysis (90%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post, but does not make connections to the material presented in the course work from the week; response posts indicate challenges with critical thinking (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 25 |
| Writing (Mechanics/ Citations) | No errors related to organization, grammar and style, or citations (100%) | Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (90%) | Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (70%) | Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0%) | 20 |
| Participation | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts which are substantive, respectful, and add something new to the discussion (100%) | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts. A majority of the posts are substantive and respectful to fellow learners (90%) | Student does not submit the required quantity or quality of participation posts (70%) | Student does not submit any participation posts to fellow learners for the discussion question (0%) | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
EthicsinEverydayLife.zip
Module Overview20.html
Ethics in Everyday Life
You see what you expect to see, Severus.
—J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Figure 10.1 (wikia.net)
Professor Dumbledore cautions Severus Snape against his own biases regarding Harry Potter in a scene from the book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Upon first meeting Harry, Snape believes the boy wizard is as conceited as his father (who was Snape’s former rival). Dumbledore prompts Snape to check his own biases at the door and further examine Harry’s character before making such a harsh judgment. Says Dumbledore, “You see what you expect to see, Severus.” Upon deeper reflection, Snape realizes there is more to Harry’s character than he had initially assumed.
If only we could call upon Professor Dumbledore for direction and guidance when we are faced with everyday ethical conflicts and dilemmas! We cannot be wizards and we cannot cast spells (or even consult a moral compass app in our smartphones) to help us make our choices, but we can seek the goodness and sound judgment represented in Dumbledore’s strong character to guide our decision making. This graphic illustrates some attributes of Dumbledore’s character. See how many of these attributes are similar to the character traits we aspire to have as psychologists serving others.
Figure 10.2 (wikispaces.com)
The light blue ovals in the diagram above highlight four attributes of Dumbledore’s character: willingness to help, wise words, wisdom, and belief in love. Although not all psychologists would use exactly these same words to describe their own character attributes, these attributes are a close fit to what we should strive for in the profession of psychology. We need to have a desire and willingness to help; we hope to find and use wisdom; we deliver wisdom by way of wise words that do not harm or judge; and we believe more in goodness or love than we do in evil and wrongdoing. Think back to the guiding principles in the APA Code of Ethics. They were: beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, and respect for people’s rights and dignity. Although the phrasing is a little different, Professor Dumbledore would likely approve of these principles.
Looking at the green ovals in the diagram, we see other indicators of what we do as psychologists as they relate to Dumbledore’s character. We give people the benefit of the doubt and we know that naming has a power, which is demonstrated when we diagnose and make recommendations. Truth is a beautiful and terrible thing. We seek the truth, yet when we find it we must proceed with care and caution. For example, think of finding out a child is being abused and needing to make a child abuse report. We sought the truth, and it was a terrible truth to find. The beautiful thing is that we can now do something with that information as long as we proceed with care and caution.
We seek to be the best we can as we interact with others. We can learn skills, practice concepts, and seek out the guidance and direction of others. Throughout your life and professional career in psychology, there will be many opportunities for cultivating your personal growth and awareness. There will also be perilous forks in the road where impatience, groupthink, a lack of information, fear, personal burdens, anger, illness, or other factors coalesce into the creation of an unclear mind and even less clear strategy for solving what lies before us.
Let’s review our journey through this course. In Module One, your first lesson was to explore your understanding of professional ethics through the perspective of your own personal experience. You were asked to look at the difference between vigilant and defensive ethical postures. You came to understand the most common reasons for unethical decision making. You accomplished this first step of understanding yourself in relation to others.
Module Two asked you to think about and understand what we mean by dual and multiple role relationships. Problems are created when we do not understand and honor our role in relation to those we serve.
Module Three introduced the APA Code of Ethics, which guides psychologists with standards of professional behavior, expectations, rules, and challenges. The APA Code of Ethics contains five guiding principles, much like the guiding principles highlighted in light blue in the Dumbledore Chart. The APA Code of Ethics also has 10 standards. These are expectations in regard to conduct and they are enforceable by the law and licensing boards.
Module Four explored professional etiquette, risky individuals, and high-risk situations in psychology. Your professional work setting was discussed. We looked to comedian George Carlin for comic guidance on how language can distort meaning and effect ethics and ethical decision making. You also described your thoughts on one of the films you were asked to review as it relates to psychological ethics.
Module Five discussed cultural sensitivity, lifestyle, and diversity. We looked at the role of empathy as it relates to serving others. We viewed the video “A Class Divided” and examined what this video suggests. We learned about the power of group consensus and groupthink. It is hoped that your understanding of Module Five will be that psychologists seek to understand their own bias and judgment so that they can avoid harming others by holding bias or judgment.
Module Six addressed informed consent and confidentiality as one of the basic elements of informed consent. We inform others about everything they need to know before we ask them to consent to any services in psychology. There are legal exceptions to confidentiality. Module Six explored the exceptions as well as the difference between privacy, confidentiality, and privileged information.
Module Seven opened up the world of solving dilemmas by offering you an eight-step model for ethical decision making. By using this model in your professional and even personal lives, you increase the likelihood of making a more ethical and mindful decision where others are concerned. Module Seven offered you an opportunity to look at restorative justice as an alternative solution for resolving difficult issues where victims and offenders are concerned.
Module Eight introduced you to difficult and challenging work settings. A challenging work setting requires even more wisdom and this is where adopting a Professor Dumbledore stance where integrity is concerned can by very useful. We looked at torture, psychologists’ involvement in the development of torture techniques, and other work settings where enhanced skill sets are necessary.
Module Nine applied previous discussion of ethics to the world of human rights and other contemporary issues. We looked at the ethical implications of moral bioenhancement. We also assessed the overall risks involved in serving others as psychologists.
Module Ten concludes by asking you to bring in some ethical challenges evident in your personal life. Let your classmates and instructor know what you think of this course and what you learned along the way. Bring all of your understanding together as you read the passage from Susan Sontag and ponder remembering as an ethical act in itself.
Remember, ethics is a field of study, an orientation to life, a way of living, a rationale, a position, and a quality of responsible stewardship as a human being. While we have discussed ethics as it applies to the field of psychology, remember that ethics applies everywhere, every day.