1-1 Short Paper: Penal Systems and Corrections Models
Please see the attached file below.
5 months ago
20
ModuleOneShortPaperGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip
ModuleOneShortPaperGuidelinesandRubric.html.zip
Module One Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric.html
CJ 320 Module One Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Changes in correction models (including the reform movement, the medical model, the community model, and the crime control model) were the result of changes in social trends. How did penal systems change? What were the social trends? Specifically, how did these trends influence thinking about corrections?
Prompt
Write a short paper that explores the relationship between social trends and corrections models.
- Compare and contrast the different penal systems (Pennsylvania, Auburn, Southern, and Western).
- Describe the predominant views on offenders and corrections prior to the development of the correction models and trace how these views changed over time.
- Describe the major attributes of each of the models.
- Examine the relationship between the social views at the time and the specific attributes of each model. Cite specific examples of how social views shaped each of the models.
What to Submit
Your short paper should be 2 to 3 pages in length and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. The paper should include at least three scholarly/academic (peer-reviewed) sources, which should be cited according to APA style.
AI Usage
If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow these AI usage guidelines. You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in this Shapiro Library guide.
Module One Short Paper Rubric
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compare Penal Systems | Penal systems are accurately compared using appropriate dimensions, and explanations manifest a depth of analysis beyond exceeds expectations | Penal systems are accurately compared using appropriate dimensions | Important points of comparison are lacking | No comparison is evident | 15 |
| Contrast Penal Systems | Penal systems are accurately contrasted using appropriate dimensions, and explanations manifest a depth of analysis beyond exceeds expectations | Penal systems are accurately contrasted using appropriate dimensions | Important points of contrast are lacking | No contrast is evident | 15 |
| Changes in Social Trends | Predominant views prior to the models are especially well described, and changes are clearly traced with details accounting for the changes | Predominant views prior to the models are clearly described and changes are clearly traced | Predominant views prior to the models are not adequately described or changes are inadequately identified and traced | No evidence of views prior to the models or changes in these views | 15 |
| Attributes of Corrections Models | Distinguishing attributes of each of the corrections models are especially well described | Distinguishing attributes of each of the corrections models are adequately identified | The identified attributes are not critical in distinguishing the models or attributes of some models were not identified | No evidence of describing the critical attributes | 15 |
| Influence of Trends on the Models | More than one example is provided for each model, illustrating the relationship between specific social views and attributes of the model, and the analyses are especially insightful | One example is provided for each model, illustrating the relationship between specific social views and attributes of the model | An example is not provided for some of the models, illustrating the relationship between specific social views and attributes of the model, or the examples fail to illustrate the influence of social views on the models | No evidence of describing the influence of social views | 15 |
| Sources | The paper cites more than the required number of scholarly sources | The paper cites the required number of scholarly sources | The paper cites less than the required number of sources or the sources do not meet sufficient standards of scholarship in the field | The paper shows no evidence of sources | 5 |
| Organization | Excellent transitions and topic sentences are used and the smooth flow of ideas explicitly follows from the thesis | Appropriate transitions are used, every paragraph contains a clear topic sentence, and ideas flow logically and relate to the thesis | The paper does not flow smoothly from paragraph to paragraph and topic sentences are missing and/or flawed | The paper lacks internal coherence, some ideas do not relate to the thesis, and/or a few paragraphs lack topic sentences | 10 |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
- MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
- •What stages of the criminal justice process are depicted in these programs? Why do you think the focus is on these stages?
- Jornal Critical Summary - for only "Creative Instructor"
- BSHS 332 Week 1 Individual Assignment Workplace Ethical Dilemma Paper
- Critical review essay
- 1250-1500 word critical thinking essay
- ACC 544 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Controls for Inflows
- ACC 542 Week 3 Individual Assignment Data Table Analysis
- ACC 492 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Case Study Assignment and Presentation
- for ''FOR ESSAY TUTOR ONLY..DONT APPLY''