1 / 5100%
Ic rememberc ac discussionc Ic hadc withc ac coworkerc regardingc ourc productionc andc thec systemc wec
used.c Inc thisc discussion,c myc coworkerc assumedc thatc becausec hisc productionc wasc highc hec wasc
recordingc hisc informationc correctly.c Usingc thatc information,c hec triedc toc convincec thosec
aroundc himc thatc hec wasc thec topc producerc withinc thec team.c Whatc hec didc notc realizec wasc thatc
hec hadc notc beenc enteringc thec timec itc tookc toc completec eachc activity.c Thisc gavec himc anc
incorrectc result.c Oncec corrected,c itc showedc thatc hec wasc notc ac topc producerc butc inc dangerc ofc
notc meetingc productionc requirements.c Ifc myc coworkerc hadc usedc properc criticalc thinkingc
skills,c hec couldc havec betterc analyzedc thec informationc toc findc missingc information.c Ic alsoc
believec thatc ifc hec hadc notc beenc biasedc towardsc himself,c hec couldc havec beenc morec objectivec toc
thec process.Anotherc situationc wasc whenc myc fatherc attemptedc toc convincec mec toc buyc ac carc
solelyc basedc onc thec brand.c Myc fatherc wasc biasc towardsc thatc specificc brandc blindingc himc toc
thec facts.c Hec attemptedc toc persuadec mec toc purchasec ac car,c evenc thoughc thec dealc wasc notc
beneficial.c Hisc onlyc reasoningc behindc itc wasc thatc itc wasc thec bestc brand.c Ifc criticalc thinkingc
hadc beenc usedc inc thisc situation,c hec couldc havec seenc thec factualc evidencec toc makec ac logicalc
decision.c Isc itc ac goodc brandc orc isc thec carc worthc thec deal?c Thosec arec questionsc thatc couldc havec
beenc takenc intoc consideration;c ultimatelyc allowingc forc ac decisionc notc basedc onc emotionc andc
bias.c Myc firstc examplec isc onec thatc happenedc atc thec workplace.c Thec principalc sentc outc toc allc
staffc aboutc gettingc toc workc onc time.c Somec peoplec thatc Ic workc withc gotc defensivec aboutc thec
email.c Ac fewc peoplec thatc hadc notc beenc gettingc toc workc onc timec feltc likec thec emailc wasn’tc
aboutc them;c becausec theyc aren’tc asc latec asc somec otherc people.c Andc theyc alsoc feltc likec ifc itc wasc
trulyc meantc forc them,c thec emailc wouldc havec onlyc wentc toc themc insteadc ofc everyone.c Theyc
usedc ac biasc calledc diffusionc ofc responsibility.c Inc orderc toc feelc lessc accountablec toc changec whatc
theyc werec doingc evenc thoughc theyc probablyc knewc thec emailc wasc aboutc them.c Thisc argumentc
couldc havec beenc adjustedc ifc myc coworkersc reflectedc onc themselves.c Ifc theyc didc this,c theyc
wouldc havec realizedc itc wasc aboutc themc andc thinkc aboutc whatc theyc couldc doc toc fixc itc andc getc
backc onc thec rightc track.Onec timec myc dadc andc Ic werec talkingc aboutc whatc wec thoughtc wasc thec
bestc brandc ofc phone.c Myc dadc favoursc Androidc phonesc andc Ic favorc Applec phones.c Toc arguec
myc point,c Ic saidc Applec hasc betterc phonesc becausec therec isc noc onec whoc makesc betterc phones.c
Andc myc dadc saidc thec Androidc hasc betterc phonesc becausec therec isc noc onec whoc makesc betterc
phones.c Neitherc ofc usc hadc evidencec orc validc pointsc toc supportc whichc brandc wec thoughtc makesc
ac betterc phone.c Ourc argumentc wentc nowhere.c Instead,c wec bothc usedc thec fallacyc calledc
beggingc thec questionc byc restatingc ourc claimc inc anotherc wayc toc supportc ourc claim.c Thisc onlyc
restatesc whatc hasc alreadyc beenc saidc andc doesn'tc addc anythingc toc supportc thec argument.c Thesec
argumentsc couldc havec beenc adjustedc byc findingc andc usingc validc pointsc andc evidence;c insteadc
ofc justc voicingc ourc opinions,c whichc meansc nothingc withoutc havingc somethingc toc backc itc up.c Ic
canc thinkc ofc twoc instancesc withc twoc differentc friendsc ofc mine,c ofc whichc onec involvedc
assumptionc andc thec otherc situationc wasc basedc onc bias.c Thec firstc examplec isc thatc Ic havec ac
friendc thatc automaticallyc assumesc whenc someonec relocatesc toc ac differentc state,c thatc they’rec
runningc fromc somec problemc andc needc toc relocatec toc establishc ac newc identity.c Thisc wasc ac
topicc thatc wec hadc anc in-depthc conversationc aboutc becausec I’mc fromc Michiganc andc relocatedc
toc Texasc andc wasc slightlyc offended.c Ic hadc toc explainc toc himc thatc thec reasonc Ic hadc relocatedc
wasc duec toc myc workc andc toc venturec outc inc ac newc environment.c Ic thenc wentc onc toc explainc thec
manyc differentc reasonsc asc toc whyc peoplec relocatec andc thatc hec shouldn’tc automaticallyc assumec
thatc it’sc duec toc somethingc shady.c Hadc hec usedc reasoningc andc didc somec researchc beforehand,c
hec wouldc havec seenc forc himself.
Thec secondc instancec wouldc bec whenc ac friendc andc myselfc werec discussingc openc relationshipsc
andc ifc theyc qualifiedc asc truec relationshipsc orc not.c I,c myself,c personallyc feelc stronglyc thatc openc
relationshipsc aren’tc consideredc asc realc andc thatc itc wasc justc ac gatewayc toc datec otherc people.c Hec
obviouslyc hadc ac differentc opinionc onc thec topicc becausec hec wasc inc factc inc anc openc relationshipc
atc thec time.c Ratherc thanc toc takec thec timec tc hearc himc out,c Ic hadc allowedc myc biasc toc overpowerc
myc judgement.c Hadc Ic usec criticalc thinkingc inc thatc argument,c Ic couldc havec atc leasec heardc hisc
pointc viewc objectivelyc andc thenc donec somec researchc insteadc ofc outrightc dismissingc himc
withoutc anyc factsc toc supportc myc stance.c Whenc Ic wasc growingc upc myc parentsc alwaysc toldc mec
thatc itc wasc illegalc toc turnc onc thec carc lightc whilec driving.c Once,c Ic wantedc toc turnc thec lightc onc
andc theyc respondedc withc thatc reasoning.c Ic neverc questionedc itc orc askedc forc ac reasonc why.c Itc
isn'tc actuallyc illegalc toc havec thec insidec carc lightc onc whilec driving.c Theyc justc didn'tc wantc mec toc
turnc thec lightc on.c Thec fallacyc inc thisc isc thatc thec ideac thatc havingc thec carc lightc onc whilec drivingc
hadc noc reasonc toc backc itc up.c Ic shouldc havec askedc whyc itc wasc illegalc andc maybec thenc Ic couldc
havec deducedc fromc theirc answerc thatc itc wasc untrue.
Ic orderedc ac saladc atc ac drivec throughc windowc andc Ic didn'tc specifyc whatc dressingc Ic wanted.c Ic
assumedc thatc theyc wouldc givec mec ranch.c Ic thoughtc thisc wasc thec automaticc dressingc thatc camec
withc salads.c Ic gotc homec andc unpackedc myc saladc toc realizec therec wasc noc dressingc atc all.c Therec
wasc noc ranch.c Ic shouldc notc havec assumedc thatc theyc wouldc putc ranchc inc thec bag.c Ic shouldc havec
realizedc Ic canc notc assumec someonec wouldc understandc whatc Ic wantc ifc Ic don;tc sayc so.c Ifc Ic hadc
onlyc toldc themc Ic wantedc ranchc andc thoughtc morec clearlyc thenc Ic wouldc havec hadc ac tastierc
salad.c Ic shouldc alsoc notc havec hadc thec biasc thatc ranchc wasc thec automaticc dressingc thatc camec
withc salads.c Itc doesn'tc sayc thatc inc writingc anywhere.c Ic hadc noc proof.c Itc wasc onlyc thec factc thatc
Ic preferredc ranchc thatc ledc toc myc bias.c Growingc upc inc ac rural,c farmingc community,c Ic hadc notc
seenc manyc Africanc Americanc individualsc before.c However,c whenc Ic enteredc middlec schoolc
andc startedc travelingc forc sports,c Ic metc manyc newc people,c includingc Africanc Americanc girlsc
thatc werec myc age.c Inc trackc Ic metc ac girlc whoc wasc anc amazingc athlete.c Shec ranc thec 100c meterc
dashc andc 200c meterc dash,c andc wasc extremelyc fast.c Onec dayc Ic askedc herc wherec herc extrac bonec
wasc thatc madec herc soc fast,c andc shec lookedc atc mec withc confusionc andc anger.c Myc grandparentsc
hadc toldc mec thatc “blackc peoplec havec anc extrac bonec inc theirc legc thatc makesc themc fasterc thanc
whitec people”c andc Ic completelyc believedc it.c Littlec didc Ic know,c thisc wasc ac fallacyc ofc division.c
Ic hadc justc offendedc herc becausec Ic assumedc somethingc completelyc untruec aboutc herc race.c Ic hadc
grownc upc inc ac placec thatc wasc notc racist,c butc didc notc havec manyc peoplec ofc colorc inc it,c thereforec
therec werec manyc falsec truthsc aboutc blackc peoplec thatc werec completelyc incorrect.c Ic nowc knowc
thatc thec colorc ofc yourc skinc doesc notc changec thec amountc ofc bonesc inc thec body.c Knowingc whatc
Ic doc nowc aboutc criticalc thinking,c Ic wouldc havec approachedc thisc inc ac completelyc differentc way.c
Ic wouldc havec firstc askedc questionsc aboutc her,c andc gottenc toc knowc herc betterc andc afterc that,c Ic
shouldc havec askedc herc ifc thisc statementc wasc true,c tryingc toc findc morec reasonc beforec Ic
automaticallyc assumedc thatc thisc falsec rumorc wasc real.c Ic wentc toc schoolc atc ac timec wherec schoolc
shootingsc werec justc beginning.c Therefore,c lockdownsc andc lockoutsc werec practicedc veryc
frequentlyc inc school.c Atc home,c Kidsc learnedc thatc thec personc whoc executedc thec Columbinec
shootingc hadc ac mentalc handicap,c whichc wasc assumedc toc bec ac formc ofc Autism.c Myc friendc
camec toc schoolc onec dayc veryc concerned,c andc toldc ourc friendc groupc thatc shec hadc somethingc toc
tellc us.c Shec toldc usc thatc Autisticc peoplec werec dangerousc becausec thec personc whoc shotc studentsc
atc thec schoolc inc Denverc wasc Autistic.c Thisc wasc ac fallacyc ofc composition.c Beingc veryc youngc
atc thec time,c nobodyc questionedc whatc shec hadc toc say.c Notc toc mention,c wec hadc anc Autisticc boyc
inc ourc grade,c andc allc startedc stayingc asc farc awayc asc possiblec fromc him.c Thatc dayc Ic wentc homec
andc toldc myc momc thec newc factc Ic learnedc atc school.c Shec quicklyc toldc mec thatc peoplec withc
mentalc illnessesc andc handicapsc hadc noc controlc overc theirc brains,c andc justc becausec theyc werec
differentc thanc mec didn’tc meanc theyc werec dangerous.c Wec allc learnedc ac veryc valuablec lesson,c
justc becausec onec personc doesc somethingc bad,c doesn’tc meanc thatc anotherc personc likec themc
willc doc thec samec things.c Thisc lessonc sticksc withc mec toc thisc day.c Now,c asc ac betterc criticalc
thinkerc Ic amc ablec toc usec reasonc whenc assessingc people.c Ic knowc thatc eachc personc isc different,c
andc shouldc notc bec judgedc byc theirc appearancec orc certainc thingsc aboutc themc likec ac mentalc
disability.c Ic oftenc witnessc individualsc whoc relyc onc bias,c fallaciesc andc assumptionsc toc persuadec
others.c Myc employerc requiresc mec toc attendc Countyc Commissionc meetingsc everyc month.c Thec
meetingsc arec structuredc toc allowc publicc commentc beforec Commissionersc votec onc anyc actions.c
Atc ac recentc meeting,c anc ordinancec toc imposec paidc timec offc (PTO)c toc allc individualsc whoc
workedc atc leastc 30c hoursc wasc beingc considered.c Overc 50c peoplec signedc upc toc persuadec thec
commissionersc toc votec onc thec ordinancec inc theirc favor.c Thosec inc supportc ofc thec ordinancec
sharedc storiesc ofc havingc toc goc toc workc toc providec forc theirc familyc evenc thoughc theyc werec
sick.c Othersc sharedc storiesc ofc losingc theirc jobc becausec theyc werec sickc andc couldc notc goc toc
work,c soc theirc employerc firedc them.c Severalc individualsc expressedc theyc deservedc PTOc justc
likec everyonec else.c Thosec individualsc thatc didc notc supportc thec ordinance,c expressedc thec
detrimentc toc smallc businesses.c Othersc conveyedc thec governmentc didc notc consideredc thec costsc
toc implementc suchc anc action.c Thec ordinancec wasc approvedc however,c severalc amendmentsc
hadc toc bec consideredc toc addressc implementationc andc establishc deliverablesc thatc willc needc toc
bec evaluatedc annually.c Bothc argumentsc failedc toc providec factualc evidence.c Thosec inc favorc
groupedc togetherc toc persuadec thec commissionersc byc usingc thec fallacyc ofc popularc appealc andc
appealc toc pity.c Thosec thatc didc notc supportc usedc thec fallacyc ofc scarec tacticsc andc appealc toc pity.c
Ultimatelyc thec commissionc sidedc withc thec majorityc ofc theirc constituents.c Thisc createdc
argumentsc betweenc thec commissionersc sincec severalc ofc themc hadc largec numbersc ofc smallc
businessesc inc theirc districtsc whilec othersc hadc fewerc smallc businessc butc hadc largec numbersc ofc
workingc class.c Byc analyzingc andc evaluatingc evidencec toc supportc thec arguments,c eachc sidec
couldc havec consideredc eachc perspectivec andc workedc collaborativelyc toc reachc ac conclusionc
thatc addressedc eachc side.c
Students also viewed