1 / 6100%
Ifd thed creatorsd ofd thed productd cannotd agreed ond ad directiond ofd howd thed projectd shouldd moved
forwardd ord whatd thed softwared shouldd evend dod andd bed capabled of,d thend thed projectd isd ind
dangerd befored itd everd leavesd thed planningd stages.d Thed firstd methodd Id couldd seed usingd tod getd
thisd issued resolvedd isd tod getd alld interestedd partiesd ind this,d whichd ind thisd cased isd firstd goingd tod
haved tod haved tod bed thed twod partnersd ind thed samed room,d tod hashd outd alld ofd thed detailsd ofd whatd
thed softwared needsd tod bed capabled ofd andd whatd featuresd needd tod bed ind used andd spotlightedd
goingd forward.d Anotherd isd tod god overd alld thed detailsd ind ad writtend mannerd liked ad mediatord andd
used myd ownd andd thed teamsd expertised tod reachd ad conclusiond andd ad pitchd ofd howd thed softwared
shouldd bed designed,d testedd andd deployed.d Asd fard asd methodsd tod moved forward,d Id dod believed
someoned elsed mentionedd thisd alreadyd butd thed waterfalld methodd wouldd bed and effectived toold ind
thisd asd itd wouldd required eachd staged bed doned ind sequenced befored movingd tod thed next.d Itd isd alsod
riskyd ind thed factd thatd itd couldd sufferd somed hang-upsd ifd thered isd and impassed betweend thed
partiesd again.d Anotherd effectingd methodd tod used wouldd bed thed adaptive,d asd itd allowsd ford
changesd ond thed flyd whiled goingd throughd alld stages.d Againd thoughd thisd couldd bed and issued ifd
theyd decidedd tod keepd makingd changesd backd andd forthd whichd wouldd slowd downd thed endd resultd
beingd deployedd tod thed customer,d ind turnd losingd theird salesd numbersd andd hurtingd thed business.d
Thisd projectd isd alreadyd riskyd dued tod thed factd thatd thed twod partnersd cannotd agreed ond whatd thed
endd goald shouldd be.d Ifd theyd cannotd agree,d thend howd dod Id knowd whatd tod do?d Also,d ifd theyd
can'td agreed thend thed companyd isd ond thed trajectoryd tod fail.d Thered ared tood manyd ideasd thatd dod
notd align,d howeverd somed ofd thed ideasd couldd bed ond thed samed page.d Thed firstd methodd Id wouldd
used isd tod interviewd thed twod separatelyd andd kindd ofd dod ad compared andd contrast.d Thisd wouldd
helpd med comed upd withd ad pland andd presentd tod both.d Thisd willd taked bothd ofd theird ideasd andd used
thed bestd onesd thatd theyd camed upd with.d Then,d hoped thatd willd getd themd ond thed samed page.d
Anotherd methodd Id couldd used is,d withd theird permission,d lookd throughd documentsd andd thingsd tod
getd and idead ofd whatd theyd needd andd comed upd withd ad pland fromd there.d Hopefullyd thisd willd
answerd whatd theyd actuallyd wantd andd againd getd themd ond thed samed page.d Ifd projectd
stakeholdersd cannotd agreed ond thed requirements,d thed project'sd successd mayd bed jeopardized.d Ifd
thered isd nod cleard definitiond ofd whatd definesd completion,d thed projectd mayd bed jeopardized.d Id
wouldd utilized twod distinctd waysd tod gatherd thed project'sd needs.d Thed firstd stepd isd tod haved ad
dialogued withd thed organization'sd customers,d employees,d andd owners.d And in-depthd interviewd
mayd provided youd withd helpfuld informationd andd freshd viewsd ond criticald partsd ofd thed project.d Id
wouldd gived mored weightd tod commentsd fromd thed floord personneld sinced theyd wouldd bed
utilizingd thed systemd ond ad dailyd basisd andd ared thed mostd acquaintedd withd thed methodd asd welld asd
whatd worksd bestd ford bothd thed customersd andd themselves.d Thed nextd wayd Id mayd used tod getd
knowledged aboutd needsd isd observation.d Keepingd and eyed ond thed Workflowd asd welld asd thed day-
to-dayd operationsd willd helpd youd understandd whatd thed stakeholdersd wantd asd welld asd whatd
featuresd wouldd bed niced tod haved butd aren'td necessary.d Ifd youd returnd tod thed ownersd withd yourd
findings,d theyd mayd bed abled tod reachd and agreementd ond thed objectivesd thatd thed programd shouldd
aimd towards.d Ifd thered ared twod partnersd thatd ared alreadyd couldd notd agree,d thered ared somed riskd
factorsd tod consider.d Firstly,d thed companiesd goalsd won'td bed alignedd andd thusd causingd delaysd ind
thed project.d Anotherd factord tod addd ind tod thed firstd example,d isd ifd delaysd ared causedd dued tod
miscommunication,d thend thatd wouldd drived costsd upd becaused thatd wouldd forced otherd membersd
ofd thed differentd stagesd (planning,d testing,d construction)d tod dod mored work.d Thed firstd methodd Id
wouldd used tod gatherd requirements,d isd tod gatherd alld thed supportingd partiesd andd discussd alld whatd
isd neededd andd wantedd ford thed company.d Thered ared twod differentd methodsd wed cand utilized ford
this,d ad predictived developmentd modeld andd and adaptived developmentd model.d Ad predictived
developmentd modeld involvesd modelsd liked thed waterfalld tod haved stagesd throughoutd thed projectd
andd haved deadlines.d Thed downsided tod thisd isd itd usuallyd takesd ad lotd longerd ford ad largerd projectd
andd couldd caused delays.d And adaptived developmentd modeld enablesd thed teamd tod changed thed
project'sd goalsd ifd necessaryd duringd development.d Havingd frequentd meetingsd tod discussd anyd
issuesd thatd haved arised andd tod haved thatd adaptived mindsetd tod benefitd thed company.d Ind manyd
ways,d thed projectd cand bed classifiedd asd ad riskyd project.d Thed firstd exampled couldd bed whend thed
projectd involvesd manyd complexitiesd andd engagesd emergingd ord newd technologiesd withind thed
business;d then,d thed projectd cand bed classifiedd asd risky.d Anotherd exampled couldd bed ifd thed
projectd hasd ad highd potentiald growthd ford unfavourabled outcomesd ord ad highd chanced ofd beingd
unsuccessful,d thend itd cand bed consideredd thatd thed projectd isd tod bed atd highd risk.d Ind thed cased ofd
writingd salesd softwared ford ad smalld sportsd equipmentd supplyd store,d bothd ofd thesed examplesd fitd
whered thed developmentd ofd salesd softwared mightd god intod riskd withd thed highd complexitiesd andd
highd chanced ofd unsuccessfuld andd unfavourabled outcomesd .Whiled gatheringd thed requirementsd
ford thed potentiald project,d manyd methodsd couldd bed engagedd ind projectd management.d Thed firstd
methodd thatd Id wouldd liked tod employd ind thed projectd isd analysingd existingd documentsd tod gatherd
requirementsd ford thed project.d Itd isd consideredd ad usefuld techniqued asd itd helpsd reviewd thed
currentd documentsd andd processesd tod understandd thed currentd business,d situationd andd systemd
andd provided betterd solutionsd ford futured improvement.d Anotherd methodd thatd Id wouldd liked tod
used ind thed projectd isd interviewingd tod gatherd requirements.d Thisd cand helpd tod getd variousd
responses.d Riskyd projectsd couldd seemd sketchyd withd howd theyd ared presentedd suchd asd notd
havingd ad cleard goald ord endgamed ford whatd theyd wantd ord notd evend havingd ad cleard showingd ofd
howd theyd wantd tod fundd thed project.d Anotherd wayd itd wouldd bed sketchyd isd tod haved and
unrealisticd timetabled andd expectationd ford whend thed projectd wouldd bed done,d settingd goalsd ford
thed projectd withoutd knowingd ord caringd howd thed projectd shouldd flowd ord thed timed andd effortd itd
takesd tod completed it.Attemptingd tod getd asd muchd informationd fromd thed stakeholdersd ond whatd
theyd reallyd wantd wouldd bed toughd asd welld ifd theyd aren’td investedd ind thed project.d Gatheringd
informationd wouldd taked ad muchd longerd timed tod completed andd couldd caused themd tod dropd thed
projectd ord attemptd tod getd someoned elsed tod dod thed job.d Presentingd thed stakeholdersd withd
similard projectsd tod showd themd thed actuald costsd andd timed neededd tod completed thed projectd
wouldd helpd showd themd whatd leveld ofd supportd thed teamd wouldd needd tod completed thed project.d
Twod methodsd tod gatherd informationd ford thisd wouldd bed firstd observing,d checkingd outd thed
companyd andd whatd theyd do,d whatd theird employeesd dod andd whatd theyd needd ford thed projectd
comparedd tod whatd thed stakeholdersd thinkd theyd needd andd showingd themd thed differentd needsd
thatd thed companyd has.d Combiningd thisd withd documentd analysisd wouldd god alongd withd
checkingd whatd theyd systemd needsd tod dod andd tod presentd themd withd ad proposedd systemd
requirementsd withd thed functionalitiesd thatd ared neededd basedd offd use.d Thed firstd exampled ofd thisd
projectd beingd classifiedd asd riskyd isd thatd thed partnersd ofd thed smalld sportsd equipmentd supplyd
stored don'td seemd tod seed eyed tod eye.d Thatd cand bed troublesomed ford ad developerd because,d youd
mightd bed gettingd twod differentd directionsd thatd theyd wantd youd tod rund in.d I'lld bunchd ind timed andd
budgetd intod oned category,d becaused theyd ared usuallyd correlated.d Havingd ad tightd deadlined andd ad
smalld budgetd cand definitelyd proved tod bed risky.d Oned wayd Id wouldd gatherd informationd aboutd
thed requirementsd ford thisd projectd isd tod lookd outsided ofd thed boxd andd seed whatd otherd companiesd
ind thed industryd ared usingd andd why.d Thisd cand gived med greatd insightd andd I'lld bed abled tod used thisd
informationd ford thed secondd wayd tod gatherd information,d whichd wouldd bed tod brainstormd withd
thed partners.d Id cand used thed templated ofd thed softwared thatd competitorsd ared usingd tod helpd bringd
themd bothd ind agreement.d However,d Id wouldd notd limitd myselfd tod onlyd twod methods.d Thered ared
severald practicald waysd tod gatherd asd muchd informationd asd Id cand tod getd ad cleard pictured ofd thed
taskd ahead.d Id wouldd personallyd considerd ad projectd tod bed riskyd whend thered ared uncleard
requirementsd ord whend thed projectd hasd ad rushedd date.d Thed twod modelsd I’lld bed usingd ford myd
examplesd isd predictived developmentd modeld andd thed waterfalld model.d itd comesd tod thed
predictived developmentd model,d generald used isd ifd youd ared abled tod lookd atd ad businessd system,d
decomposed itd andd quantitativelyd (datad collection)d representd itsd internald stated (featured
selection),d thend model/predictd howd thatd internald stated changesd basedd ond time/otherd inputs.d
Thed predictived modeld cand bed usedd tod knowd whatd thed specificd timed framed shouldd be.d Ind thed
otherd handd Waterfalld isd thed ultimated "happyd path"d ofd softwared development.d Everythingd
worksd ind specificd stages.d Everyd stepd isd completedd befored thed nextd oned cand begin.d So,d whend
youd gatherd upd everyd requirementd youd wantd tod meet,d thend designd everythingd aboutd thed
programd tod meetd thed customers’d requirementsd couldd change,d ord youd findd outd thatd somethingd
ind yourd designd didn'td coverd ad requirementd thed wayd youd want.d Unfortunately,d that’sd hardd tod
dod ind waterfall,d becaused you'red supposedd tod bed doned withd itd already,d there'sd typicallyd nod
bandwidthd ind thed teamd tod handled it,d sinced everyone'sd workingd ond anotherd step.d Thered ared
manyd risksd involvedd whend twod partnersd don’td seed eyed tod eyed ond whatd ad specificd softwared
shouldd do.d d Oned riskd Id seed ind thisd situationd ared incompleted andd uncleard requirements.d Twod
partnersd withd differentd viewsd ond howd ad productd shouldd functiond couldd provided differentd
requirementsd ord leaved outd specificd functions.d Anotherd riskd thatd goesd handd ind handd isd thed lackd
ofd ad funding.d Oned partnerd mayd seed theird requirementsd notd beingd metd andd mayd notd provided
thed necessaryd budgetd tod completed thed project.
Twod waysd Id wouldd used tod gatherd thed requirementsd ford thisd projectd isd tod lookd atd thed currentd
softwared andd methodsd beingd used.d Thisd wayd Id cand determined whatd thed partnerd thinkd aboutd
thed currentd softwared thatd workd welld andd whatd partd dod not.d Second,d Id wouldd interviewd themd
separatelyd tod determined howd theyd seed thed newd softwared shouldd work.d Thisd cand helpd findd
commond groundd ford howd thed newd softwared shouldd function.d Itd mayd alsod highlightd otherd
factorsd thatd wered notd consideredd originallyd thatd couldd helpd alignd thed partnersd views.d
Students also viewed