1 / 47100%
Running head: EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Assignment 2: Evaluation of the Agency's Public Personnel Administration
Student Name
Course:
Instructor:
Strayer University
May 5, 2019
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Assignment 2: Evaluation of Agency’s Public Personnel Administration, Part 2
Due Week 5 and worth 250 points
Refer to theScenario for Assignments 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:
1. Analyze the organizational design of the selected
agency’shumanresourcemanagementin relationship to the entire
organization. Assess its strengths and weaknesses. (Title this section
"Organizational Design")
2. Assess the agency in terms of its global or international linkages, highlighting
its application of theory to its approach to personnelmanagement. (Title this
section "Global Linkages and PersonnelManagement")
3. Analyze at least three (3) of the major components of the
agency’shumanresourcesystem’s goals and practices regarding the
recruitment and hiring of a quali.ed workforce. (Title this section "Personnel
Recruitment and Hiring Practices")
4. Evaluate the agency’s approach to training and programs provided for new
and existing employees for the development of knowledge, skills, and overall
competencies, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses. (Title this section
"Employee Skills Training")
5. Recommend at least two (2) actions the agency could take to improve in the
areas of recruiting and training a quali.ed workforce. (Title this section
"Recruiting and Training Recommendations")
6. Appropriately incorporate at least four (4) quality sources. A quality source
can be either popular, such as a news article, or scholarly, such as peer
reviewed works. In the case of public administration, government websites
are appropriate qualityresources.Note:Wikipedia, Spark Notes, and similar
websites do not qualify as academicresources. Visit the Strayer University
Library athttp://research.strayer.eduto conduct research.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with
one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA
or school-speci.c format. Check with your professor for any additional
instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
The cover page, revisions of the previous assignment, and the
reference page are not included in the required assignment page
length.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Description:
Total Possible Score: 6.00
Describes a Business Organization for Which Student is Proposing a System Design
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and clearly describes a business organization for which student is proposing a system design.
Proficient - Describes a business organization for which student is proposing a system design. Minor details are missing or slightly
unclear.
Basic - Partially describes a business organization for which student is proposing a system design. Relevant details are missing
and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe a business organization for which student is proposing a system design; however,
significant details are missing and entirely unclear.
Non-Performance - The description of a business organization for which student is proposing a system design is either nonexistent
or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes the Business Requirements of the Proposed System
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly and clearly describes the business requirement of the proposed system.
Proficient - Describes the business requirement of the proposed system. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.
Basic - Partially describes the business requirement of the proposed system. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the business requirement of the proposed system; however, significant details are
missing and entirely unclear.
Non-Performance - The business requirement of the proposed system is either nonexistent or lack the components described in the
assignment instructions.
Justifies Design of the New or Replacement System in Terms of Costs, Benefits to Stakeholders,
and Alignment with Business Goals
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively justifies design of the new or replacement system in terms of costs, benefits to stakeholders, and
alignment with business goals.
Proficient - Justifies the design of the new or replacement system in terms of costs, benefits to stakeholders, and alignment with
business goals. The justification is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally justifies the design of the new or replacement system in terms of costs, benefits to stakeholders, and alignment
with business goals. The justification is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to justify the design of the new or replacement system in terms of costs, benefits to stakeholders,
and alignment with business goals; however, the justification is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The justification of the design of the new or replacement system in terms of costs, benefits to stakeholders, and
alignment with business goals is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.25
Distinguished -Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.
Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Proficient -Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic -Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors
which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations -Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
PowerPoint Presentation: Sequencing and Organization
Total: 0.25
Distinguished -Information is exceptionally organized and there is a clear, logical progression of ideas.
Proficient -Information is organized and there is a logical progression of ideas.
Basic -Information is somewhat organized, but there is not a logical progression of ideas.
Below Expectations -The presentation does not follow a logical progression of ideas and lacks organization.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished -The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient -The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic -The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations -The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages. 
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished -Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All
sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient -Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited
correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic -Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the
reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formattedcorrectly.
Below Expectations -Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be
scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Introduction
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is an independent
federal agency that is primarily responsible for administering civilian foreign and development
assistance. The agency advances United States national security and economic prosperity and
promotes a path to recipient self-reliance and resilience. Like any other agency, USAID has a
human resource department that is primarily responsible for hiring and recruitment, training and
development of staff, management of employee benefits among others. To this end, USAID
employs various public personnel administration strategies to enhance its human resource
management activities and to ensure the agency hires the best talents in the market. It is against
this background that this paper evaluates USAID's public personnel administration and to offer
recommendations for improving core areas of recruitment and training qualified staff.
Organizational Design
Title: Organizational Design of the Selected Agency's Human Resource Management
Introduction: Organizational design plays a crucial role in shaping the efficiency and
effectiveness of an agency's human resource management. This section will analyze the
organizational design of the selected agency's human resource management and evaluate its
strengths and weaknesses.
Overview of Organizational Design:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
The organizational design refers to the framework of roles, responsibilities, and reporting
relationships within an organization.
It determines how tasks are divided, coordinated, and controlled to achieve organizational goals
effectively.
Analysis of Organizational Design:
Hierarchical Structure: The selected agency follows a hierarchical organizational structure where
authority flows from top-level management to lower-level employees.
Strengths:
Clear Chain of Command: This structure ensures a clear chain of command, allowing for better
decision-making and accountability.
Defined Roles: Employees understand their roles and responsibilities within the organization,
which minimizes confusion.
Weaknesses:
Centralized Decision-Making: Decision-making authority is concentrated at the top levels of
management, which can result in delays and inefficiencies.
Limited Flexibility: Hierarchical structures can be rigid, making it challenging to adapt to
changes in the external environment.
Functional Departments: The agency's human resource management is organized into functional
departments such as recruitment, training, compensation, and employee relations.
Strengths:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Specialization: Functional departments allow for specialization, enabling employees to focus on
specific HR functions, which can lead to expertise and efficiency.
Efficient Resource Allocation: Resources are allocated based on functional needs, ensuring
optimal utilization.
Weaknesses:
Siloed Communication: Functional departments may operate in silos, hindering communication
and collaboration between different HR functions.
Lack of Holistic View: This structure may result in a fragmented view of employees' needs and
organizational goals, leading to suboptimal decision-making.
Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses:
The hierarchical structure provides clarity in reporting relationships and role delineation, which
enhances accountability and coordination.
However, centralized decision-making and limited flexibility may impede innovation and
responsiveness to change.
Functional departments promote specialization and efficient resource allocation but may lead to
siloed communication and a lack of holistic perspective.
Conclusion: The organizational design of the selected agency's human resource management has
both strengths and weaknesses. While the hierarchical structure provides clarity and
accountability, it may inhibit flexibility and innovation. Functional departments enable
specialization but can lead to communication barriers. Overall, there is room for improvement to
enhance agility, collaboration, and alignment with organizational goals.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Hierarchical Structure:
Clear Chain of Command: The hierarchical structure typically features a clear chain of command
where decisions flow from top-level executives down to lower-level employees. This structure
ensures that every employee knows who they report to and who they can turn to for guidance or
approvals.
Division of Labor: Hierarchical structures often involve the division of labor, where tasks and
responsibilities are divided among different levels of employees based on their positions within
the organization. This division helps in specialization and ensures that each employee focuses on
their core tasks.
Centralization of Authority: In many hierarchical structures, decision-making authority tends to
be concentrated at the higher levels of management. While this can ensure consistency and
alignment with organizational goals, it may also lead to bureaucracy and slow decision-making
processes.
Levels of Management: Hierarchical structures typically consist of multiple levels of
management, including top-level executives, middle managers, and frontline supervisors. Each
level has its own set of responsibilities and authority levels.
Functional Departments:
Recruitment and Selection: This department is responsible for sourcing, attracting, and hiring
new employees. It involves activities such as job posting, resume screening, interviewing, and
candidate selection.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Training and Development: The training and development department focuses on enhancing the
skills, knowledge, and abilities of employees. It may offer orientation programs for new hires,
ongoing training sessions, leadership development programs, and specialized workshops.
Compensation and Benefits: This department manages employee compensation, including
salaries, wages, bonuses, and benefits such as health insurance, retirement plans, and other perks.
It ensures that compensation packages are competitive and aligned with organizational
objectives.
Employee Relations: Employee relations departments handle issues related to employee morale,
satisfaction, and engagement. They may address conflicts, grievances, disciplinary actions, and
employee communications. They also promote a positive work culture and facilitate employee
feedback mechanisms.
Communication and Coordination:
Formal Communication Channels: Hierarchical structures typically rely on formal
communication channels, such as official memos, emails, meetings, and reports. These channels
ensure that information flows according to the established hierarchy and protocols.
Informal Communication Networks: Despite the formal structure, organizations also have
informal communication networks that allow employees to connect and exchange information
more casually. These networks can facilitate collaboration, problem-solving, and innovation.
Coordination Mechanisms: Effective coordination is essential for ensuring that different
departments and levels of the organization work together harmoniously to achieve common
goals. Coordination mechanisms may include regular meetings, cross-functional teams, and
project management tools.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Flexibility and Adaptability:
Agile Practices: In today's dynamic business environment, organizations need to be agile and
adaptable to respond quickly to changes and challenges. This may involve adopting agile
practices such as iterative planning, continuous improvement, and cross-functional collaboration.
Flat Hierarchies: Some organizations opt for flatter hierarchies where decision-making authority
is decentralized, and there are fewer levels of management. Flat hierarchies promote autonomy,
empowerment, and faster decision-making.
Matrix Structures: Matrix structures combine aspects of both hierarchical and functional designs,
allowing employees to report to multiple managers and work on cross-functional teams. This
structure promotes flexibility and collaboration but can also lead to complexity and role
ambiguity.
By considering these additional details, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the
organizational design of the selected agency's human resource management and its implications
for organizational effectiveness and efficiency.
Hierarchical Structure:
Span of Control: This refers to the number of subordinates a manager directly supervises. A
narrow span of control means fewer employees report to each manager, allowing for closer
supervision but potentially creating bottlenecks in decision-making. A wide span of control may
lead to more autonomy for employees but could result in less oversight.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Scalar Principle: This principle emphasizes the chain of command within a hierarchical structure,
stating that authority flows vertically from top to bottom. Understanding and adhering to this
principle helps maintain order and clarity in decision-making processes.
Formalization: This aspect of organizational design refers to the extent to which rules,
procedures, and processes are codified and standardized within the organization. High
formalization can lead to consistency and predictability but may also stifle creativity and
innovation.
Functional Departments:
Outsourcing: Some organizations choose to outsource certain HR functions, such as payroll
processing, recruitment, or training, to external vendors or specialized agencies. Outsourcing can
provide cost savings, access to specialized expertise, and flexibility, but it requires careful
management to ensure alignment with organizational goals and values.
Shared Services Model: In a shared services model, certain HR functions are centralized and
provided as services to different departments or units within the organization. This approach can
improve efficiency, standardization, and resource allocation by pooling resources and expertise.
Cross-Functional Collaboration: Effective collaboration between different HR functions is
essential for ensuring holistic and integrated HR management. Cross-functional teams or
committees can facilitate communication, coordination, and alignment of efforts across various
HR areas.
Communication and Coordination:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Information Systems: The use of technology, such as HR information systems (HRIS), can
streamline communication and coordination by providing a centralized platform for storing and
accessing HR-related data, documents, and reports. HRIS can automate routine tasks, facilitate
data analysis, and improve decision-making.
Performance Metrics: Establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics related to HR
processes and outcomes can help monitor performance, identify areas for improvement, and
track progress toward organizational goals. Metrics could include employee turnover rates, time-
to-fill vacancies, training effectiveness, and employee satisfaction scores.
Change Management: Effective communication and coordination are particularly crucial during
times of organizational change, such as mergers, reorganizations, or technology
implementations. Change management strategies should include clear communication plans,
stakeholder engagement, training and support, and mechanisms for soliciting feedback and
addressing concerns.
Flexibility and Adaptability:
Contingency Planning: Organizations should develop contingency plans to anticipate and
respond to unexpected events or disruptions, such as natural disasters, economic downturns, or
changes in government regulations. Flexible HR policies and practices can help mitigate risks
and ensure business continuity.
Continuous Learning: Encouraging a culture of continuous learning and development among
employees and HR professionals is essential for staying abreast of industry trends, best practices,
and emerging technologies. Investing in training, mentorship programs, and knowledge-sharing
platforms can foster innovation and adaptability.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Organizational Culture: The organizational culture plays a significant role in shaping flexibility
and adaptability. Cultures that value experimentation, open communication, and empowerment
are more likely to embrace change and thrive in dynamic environments. HR practices, such as
performance management, rewards and recognition, and leadership development, should
reinforce desired cultural attributes.
By considering these additional aspects, you can gain deeper insights into the complexities of
organizational design within the selected agency's human resource management and its
implications for organizational performance and success.
Hierarchical Structure:
Authority Distribution: Within a hierarchical structure, it's essential to consider how authority is
distributed across different levels of management. Decentralizing decision-making authority to
lower levels can empower employees, promote innovation, and enhance responsiveness to local
needs. However, striking the right balance between centralization and decentralization is crucial
to ensure consistency and alignment with organizational goals.
Organizational Charts: Organizational charts visually represent the hierarchical structure of an
organization, illustrating reporting relationships, departments, and positions. Analyzing the
agency's organizational chart can provide insights into the formal structure and how various HR
functions are positioned within the broader organization.
Matrix Structures: In addition to traditional hierarchical structures, some organizations adopt
matrix structures, where employees report to both functional managers (e.g., HR managers) and
project managers simultaneously. Matrix structures can facilitate cross-functional collaboration,
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
resource sharing, and knowledge exchange but may also introduce complexities in role clarity
and accountability.
Functional Departments:
Strategic HR Functions: Beyond operational HR activities such as recruitment and training,
strategic HR functions focus on aligning human capital with organizational goals and driving
long-term success. These functions may include workforce planning, talent management,
succession planning, and organizational development.
HR Service Delivery Models: HR service delivery models define how HR services are delivered
to employees and managers within the organization. Common models include shared services,
where HR activities are centralized into a dedicated service center, and centers of expertise,
where specialized HR functions (e.g., compensation, talent acquisition) provide support to
various business units.
HR Technology Integration: The integration of HR technology solutions, such as HRIS, talent
management systems, and analytics platforms, is integral to modern HR functions. These
technologies streamline HR processes, improve data accuracy and accessibility, and enable data-
driven decision-making. Assessing the agency's use of HR technology can reveal opportunities
for enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in HR management.
Communication and Coordination:
Stakeholder Engagement: Effective communication and coordination require proactive
engagement with internal and external stakeholders, including employees, managers, unions,
government agencies, and community partners. Building strong relationships with stakeholders
fosters trust, collaboration, and mutual understanding of HR policies and practices.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Change Communication: During periods of organizational change, such as restructurings,
mergers, or policy updates, transparent and timely communication is essential to manage
employee expectations, alleviate concerns, and gain buy-in from affected parties. Change
communication strategies should address the "what," "why," and "how" of the change while
providing opportunities for feedback and dialogue.
Performance Management: Performance management systems play a critical role in aligning
employee performance with organizational goals, providing feedback, and supporting employee
development. Effective performance management involves setting clear expectations, conducting
regular performance evaluations, recognizing achievements, and addressing performance gaps
through coaching, training, or corrective actions.
Flexibility and Adaptability:
Agile HR Practices: Agile methodologies, commonly used in software development and project
management, are increasingly being applied to HR functions to enhance flexibility and
responsiveness. Agile HR practices emphasize iterative planning, rapid experimentation, and
adaptive teamwork, allowing HR teams to quickly adjust to changing business needs and market
conditions.
Flexible Work Arrangements: The rise of remote work, flexible scheduling, and alternative work
arrangements has transformed how organizations approach workforce management. Embracing
flexible work arrangements can enhance employee satisfaction, work-life balance, and
productivity while reducing costs associated with office space and commuting.
Continuous Improvement: Continuous improvement processes, such as Lean Six Sigma or
Kaizen, encourage ongoing evaluation and optimization of HR processes to eliminate waste,
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
improve efficiency, and enhance the employee experience. Engaging employees in problem-
solving and process improvement initiatives can foster a culture of innovation and continuous
learning within the HR function.
By exploring these additional aspects, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the
organizational design of the selected agency's human resource management and identify
opportunities for improvement and innovation in HR practices.
Hierarchical Structure:
Decision-making Processes: Understanding how decisions are made within the hierarchical
structure is crucial. This includes examining whether decisions are centralized at the top level,
decentralized to lower levels, or if there's a combination of both. Assessing the speed,
effectiveness, and inclusivity of decision-making processes can highlight areas for improvement.
Formalization Levels: Hierarchical structures vary in their degree of formalization. Some
organizations have highly formalized structures with clearly defined policies, procedures, and
job descriptions, while others may have more flexibility and informality. Evaluating the level of
formalization can shed light on the organization's culture, agility, and adherence to established
norms.
Functional Departments:
Resource Allocation: Analyzing how resources such as budget, staff, and technology are
allocated across different HR functions can reveal insights into the organization's priorities and
strategic focus. Assessing whether resources are distributed equitably and aligned with
organizational goals is essential for optimizing HR performance.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Interdepartmental Collaboration: Effective collaboration between HR functions and other
departments is essential for achieving organizational objectives. Assessing the level of
collaboration, communication channels, and mechanisms for resolving conflicts between
departments can identify opportunities for enhancing synergy and alignment.
Communication and Coordination:
Communication Channels: Examining the variety and effectiveness of communication channels
within the organization can provide valuable insights. This includes assessing the use of email,
intranet portals, meetings, newsletters, and social media platforms for disseminating information,
soliciting feedback, and fostering dialogue among employees.
Coordination Mechanisms: Evaluating how different HR functions coordinate their activities and
initiatives is critical for ensuring coherence and avoiding duplication of efforts. This may involve
assessing the use of project management tools, cross-functional teams, and regular meetings to
align priorities, timelines, and resources.
Flexibility and Adaptability:
Change Management Processes: Assessing the organization's approach to managing change is
essential for gauging its flexibility and adaptability. This includes evaluating the effectiveness of
change communication strategies, employee engagement initiatives, training programs, and
support mechanisms for navigating transitions and uncertainty.
Agility in Response to External Factors: Analyzing how the organization responds to external
factors such as market trends, regulatory changes, technological advancements, and socio-
economic shifts can provide insights into its agility and resilience. Organizations that
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
demonstrate the ability to anticipate and adapt to external challenges are better positioned for
long-term success.
Talent Management Practices: Talent management encompasses a range of activities, including
recruitment, retention, development, and succession planning. Assessing the organization's talent
management practices can reveal its capacity to attract, nurture, and retain top talent, as well as
its ability to adapt to evolving workforce demographics and skill requirements.
By exploring these specific aspects in greater detail, you can conduct a more comprehensive
analysis of the organizational design of the selected agency's human resource management and
identify opportunities for enhancing effectiveness, efficiency, and alignment with organizational
goals.
Noteworthy, USAID has created the Office of Human Capital and Talent Management
that finds, develops, and makes efforts to retain the best talents at the agency. In addition, this
department handles all aspects of personnel activities, from recruitment and workforce planning
to policy development, assignment evaluation, promotion, discipline, career development, and
retirement policies and programs for USAID's Foreign and Civil Service employees" (USAID,
2015). It is important to note that USAID emphasizes fairness in all its hiring and recruitment
processes. For instance, the OHCTM bases all its hiring and recruitment processes on the
principle of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) which protects on candidates against
discrimination on the bases of their race, gender, nationality, ethnicity, and other qualified
characteristics.
The other important strength of USAID's human resource management is diversity. It is
important to note that this agency employs individuals from across all racial, ethnic, gender, and
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
national backgrounds. To this end, USAID has created the Office of Diversity (OCRD) whose
primary goal is to promote and foster a diverse and inclusive workplace that is free from any
form of discrimination and where every employee is valued and given an equal opportunity to
contribute to their fullest potential (USAID, 2015). Effective diversity management makes
USAID one of the best federal agencies for anyone to work at.
Global Linkages and Personnel Management
USAID collaborates with other agencies and organizations from around the world with
whom they share resources and work together to carry of various projects and initiatives. USAID
also understands the critical role of personnel management and has thus established effective
strategies to make their workforce more valuable for the organization. Also, the agency's
approach to personnel management is founded on Vroom's Expectancy Theory which holds that
an employee is motivated to exert a high level of effort when he or she believes such actions
would lead to a good performance appraisal, good organizational rewards, and those
organizational rewards will satisfy his or her personal goals. This theory assumes that behavior
is a function of conscious choices among alternatives and its purposes to maximize pleasure
while minimizing pain.
Title: Global Linkages and Personnel Management
Introduction: Globalization has significantly influenced the operations and strategies of
organizations, including their approach to personnel management. This section assesses the
selected agency's global or international linkages and examines how it applies theoretical
concepts to its personnel management practices.
Globalization and Personnel Management:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Global Expansion: Evaluate whether the selected agency has expanded its operations
internationally or has global linkages through partnerships, collaborations, or subsidiaries in
other countries. Assess the extent to which internationalization impacts its personnel
management practices.
Multinational Workforce: Analyze the composition of the agency's workforce, considering
factors such as diversity, cultural backgrounds, and geographic distribution. Examine how the
agency manages a multinational workforce and addresses challenges related to language barriers,
cultural differences, and cross-border collaboration.
Global Talent Acquisition: Assess the agency's approach to recruiting and retaining talent on a
global scale. Consider how it attracts candidates from diverse backgrounds, leverages
international networks, and adapts recruitment strategies to target specific talent pools in
different regions.
Cross-Cultural Training: Evaluate whether the agency provides cross-cultural training and
development programs to employees working in international contexts. Examine how it fosters
cultural awareness, sensitivity, and competence among staff members to facilitate effective
communication and collaboration across borders.
Application of Theory to Personnel Management:
Institutional Theory: Assess how the agency's personnel management practices are influenced by
institutional factors such as legal frameworks, industry standards, and cultural norms in different
countries. Analyze how the agency adapts its HR policies and procedures to comply with local
regulations and align with global best practices.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Resource-Based View (RBV): Evaluate the agency's approach to managing human resources as
valuable, rare, and inimitable assets that contribute to its competitive advantage. Examine how it
invests in employee development, promotes a culture of innovation, and fosters employee
engagement to enhance organizational performance on a global scale.
Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions: Apply Hofstede's cultural dimensions framework to assess how
the agency navigates cultural differences and manages diversity within its workforce. Analyze
how dimensions such as individualism-collectivism, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance
influence its personnel management practices, communication styles, and leadership approaches.
Transnational HR Strategy: Evaluate whether the agency adopts a transnational HR strategy that
balances global integration and local responsiveness. Assess how it standardizes core HR
processes while allowing for flexibility and customization to accommodate regional variations
and preferences.
Conclusion: The assessment of the selected agency's global linkages and application of theory to
its personnel management practices reveals its capacity to operate effectively in an increasingly
interconnected world. By understanding and leveraging global trends, cultural dynamics, and
theoretical frameworks, the agency can enhance its competitiveness, adaptability, and
sustainability in the global marketplace. Recommendations may include further investment in
cross-cultural training, alignment of HR practices with global standards, and the development of
a cohesive transnational HR strategy to support organizational objectives.
Global Linkages:
International Partnerships and Collaborations: Assess whether the agency has established
partnerships or collaborations with international organizations, governments, or non-
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
governmental organizations (NGOs) to address global challenges or pursue common goals.
These partnerships may involve joint projects, knowledge sharing, capacity building, or resource
mobilization efforts.
Cross-Border Operations: Evaluate the extent of the agency's involvement in cross-border
operations, such as international projects, humanitarian missions, or diplomatic initiatives.
Consider how the agency manages personnel across different geographical locations, including
staffing, training, and logistical support.
Global Supply Chain Management: If applicable, examine how the agency manages its global
supply chain, including sourcing materials, products, or services from international suppliers or
vendors. Assess the impact of supply chain disruptions, geopolitical risks, or trade regulations on
personnel management decisions, such as workforce planning and contingency planning.
Application of Theory to Personnel Management:
Comparative HRM Approaches: Compare and contrast the agency's HRM practices across
different countries or regions, taking into account variations in legal frameworks, cultural norms,
labor market conditions, and socio-economic factors. Analyze how the agency adapts its HRM
strategies to local contexts while maintaining alignment with global objectives.
Expatriate Management: Evaluate the agency's approach to managing expatriates (employees
working outside their home country) and inpatriates (foreign employees working within the
agency's home country). Consider issues such as recruitment, selection, training, compensation,
repatriation, and cross-cultural adjustment support for expatriate personnel.
Global Leadership Development: Assess the agency's efforts to develop global leaders capable of
navigating complex cross-cultural environments and driving organizational success on a global
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
scale. Examine leadership development programs, succession planning initiatives, and talent
mobility strategies aimed at grooming leaders with diverse perspectives and experiences.
Cultural Intelligence (CQ): Explore how the agency fosters cultural intelligence among its
employees to enhance their ability to work effectively across cultural boundaries. Consider
training programs, cultural immersion experiences, and coaching interventions designed to
develop CQ competencies such as cultural sensitivity, adaptability, and perspective-taking.
Global HR Metrics and Analytics:
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Identify and analyze key HR metrics and performance
indicators used by the agency to evaluate the effectiveness of its global personnel management
strategies. Examples may include metrics related to employee engagement, turnover rates,
expatriate success rates, diversity and inclusion outcomes, and global talent acquisition metrics.
HR Analytics: Assess the agency's use of HR analytics and data-driven decision-making
techniques to derive insights, identify trends, and predict outcomes related to global personnel
management. Explore how analytics tools and technologies are utilized to optimize workforce
planning, talent management, and organizational performance in a global context.
By exploring these additional dimensions, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of
the selected agency's global linkages and its application of theory to its approach to personnel
management. This deeper analysis can inform strategic decisions, drive continuous improvement
efforts, and enhance the agency's ability to thrive in an increasingly interconnected and diverse
global environment.
International Staffing Strategies:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Assess the agency's approach to international staffing, including expatriate assignments, local
hires, and third-country nationals. Examine how the agency identifies staffing needs, selects
candidates, and manages the relocation and integration process for international assignments.
Analyze the agency's policies regarding compensation and benefits for international staff,
considering factors such as cost-of-living adjustments, hardship allowances, tax equalization, and
expatriate benefits packages. Evaluate how these policies align with global market standards and
support the agency's talent acquisition and retention goals.
Explore the agency's strategies for developing a diverse and inclusive workforce in international
locations, including efforts to recruit and promote employees from different cultural
backgrounds, genders, and ethnicities. Assess how the agency fosters a culture of inclusion and
belonging among its global workforce.
Cross-Cultural Communication and Training:
Examine the agency's cross-cultural communication strategies and training programs aimed at
enhancing employees' cultural competence and effectiveness in diverse work environments.
Evaluate the content, delivery methods, and effectiveness of these programs in promoting
understanding, respect, and collaboration across cultural boundaries.
Assess the agency's use of intercultural competence frameworks, such as Bennett's
Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity or the Cultural Intelligence (CQ) model, to
assess and develop employees' cultural competence. Explore how these frameworks inform
training initiatives and guide employees in navigating cultural differences.
Consider the role of language training and language proficiency assessments in the agency's
approach to cross-cultural communication. Evaluate how language skills impact employees'
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
effectiveness in international assignments and interactions, and assess the agency's efforts to
support language learning and proficiency development.
Global Talent Development and Mobility:
Analyze the agency's talent development and mobility programs aimed at identifying and
developing high-potential employees for global leadership roles. Assess how the agency
identifies talent gaps, provides developmental opportunities, and facilitates career progression for
employees interested in international assignments or career paths.
Explore the agency's strategies for managing talent mobility, including policies regarding
rotational assignments, career pathing, and talent retention. Evaluate how the agency balances
the needs of individual employees with organizational requirements for talent deployment and
succession planning.
Consider the role of mentoring, coaching, and peer support networks in supporting the
development and integration of globally mobile employees. Assess how the agency fosters a
sense of community and support among employees navigating international assignments and
transitions.
Global HR Policies and Compliance:
Evaluate the agency's approach to developing and implementing global HR policies and practices
that comply with local regulations, international standards, and organizational values. Consider
how the agency ensures consistency, fairness, and legality across different regions while
accommodating local customs and practices.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Assess the agency's mechanisms for monitoring and ensuring compliance with global HR
policies, including audits, assessments, and reporting requirements. Explore how the agency
addresses legal and ethical challenges related to labor laws, human rights, and diversity and
inclusion in its global operations.
Examine the role of HR technology systems and platforms in facilitating global HR
management, including centralized HRIS, payroll systems, and compliance tracking tools.
Evaluate how these systems support data management, reporting, and decision-making in a
global context, while ensuring data security and privacy compliance.
By exploring these specific dimensions, you can gain a deeper understanding of the selected
agency's global linkages and its approach to personnel management in an international context.
This analysis can help identify strengths, challenges, and opportunities for enhancing the
agency's global HR strategies and practices.
Global Recruitment and Selection:
Analyze the agency's global recruitment strategies, including sourcing channels, recruitment
platforms, and international partnerships. Evaluate how the agency attracts talent from diverse
geographical regions and cultural backgrounds, considering factors such as language proficiency,
work authorization, and mobility requirements.
Assess the selection processes used by the agency to screen and evaluate candidates for
international assignments or roles. Consider the use of competency-based interviews, assessment
centers, and cultural fit assessments to ensure alignment with the agency's values, mission, and
performance expectations.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Explore the agency's efforts to promote diversity and inclusion in its recruitment practices,
including initiatives to mitigate unconscious bias, enhance diversity in candidate pools, and
ensure equitable opportunities for all applicants regardless of nationality or background.
Global Performance Management:
Evaluate the agency's approach to performance management for its global workforce, including
goal setting, performance evaluations, feedback mechanisms, and performance improvement
plans. Assess how performance expectations are communicated, monitored, and aligned with
organizational goals across different geographical locations.
Analyze the agency's use of performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) to
measure individual and team performance in international contexts. Consider how performance
data is collected, analyzed, and used to identify talent gaps, address performance issues, and
recognize high performers.
Explore the role of performance feedback and coaching in supporting employees' development
and career growth in global roles. Assess how managers provide constructive feedback, identify
learning opportunities, and support employees in achieving their professional goals within the
context of cross-cultural dynamics and diverse work environments.
Global Compensation and Benefits:
Assess the agency's global compensation strategy, including salary structures, incentive
programs, and benefits packages offered to employees in different countries or regions. Evaluate
how the agency benchmarks compensation levels against local market practices, cost-of-living
indices, and industry standards.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Analyze the agency's approach to managing expatriate compensation, including considerations
for tax equalization, housing allowances, relocation benefits, and hardship premiums. Assess
how the agency balances the need to attract and retain talent with cost containment and
compliance with international tax laws and regulations.
Explore the role of non-monetary benefits and perks in the agency's global compensation
package, such as healthcare coverage, retirement plans, flexible work arrangements, and
professional development opportunities. Evaluate how these benefits contribute to employee
satisfaction, engagement, and retention in international assignments.
Global Employee Engagement and Retention:
Evaluate the agency's strategies for engaging and retaining employees in international locations,
including initiatives to promote a positive work culture, foster employee morale, and support
career development. Assess how the agency measures and tracks employee engagement levels
across different regions and cultural contexts.
Analyze the role of leadership and managerial support in driving employee engagement and
retention in global teams. Explore how managers foster trust, communication, and collaboration
among team members, especially in virtual or geographically dispersed settings.
Assess the agency's efforts to recognize and reward employees for their contributions and
achievements in international assignments. Consider how recognition programs, incentives, and
career advancement opportunities are tailored to the needs and preferences of employees in
diverse cultural environments.
By delving into these specific areas, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the
selected agency's global linkages and its approach to personnel management in an international
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
context. This deeper analysis can inform strategic decisions, drive continuous improvement
efforts, and enhance the agency's competitiveness and effectiveness on the global stage.
Global Leadership Development:
Evaluate the agency's programs and initiatives for developing global leaders capable of
navigating complex cross-cultural environments. Assess how the agency identifies high-potential
talent, provides leadership training and coaching, and offers opportunities for international
assignments and exposure.
Analyze the competencies and skills emphasized in the agency's global leadership development
framework, considering factors such as cultural intelligence, cross-cultural communication,
strategic thinking, and adaptability. Explore how leadership development programs align with
the agency's strategic objectives and talent management priorities.
Assess the agency's efforts to promote diversity and inclusion in leadership development
initiatives, including initiatives to identify and support underrepresented groups in leadership
pipelines. Consider how the agency fosters a culture of inclusive leadership and promotes diverse
perspectives in decision-making processes.
Global Workforce Planning:
Evaluate the agency's approach to workforce planning in the context of global operations,
including forecasting talent needs, identifying skill gaps, and developing strategies to attract,
retain, and develop talent across different regions and functions.
Analyze how the agency leverages workforce analytics and data-driven insights to inform
workforce planning decisions, such as demographic trends, turnover rates, succession planning,
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
and talent mobility patterns. Assess how workforce planning strategies support the agency's
short-term and long-term business objectives.
Explore the role of scenario planning and contingency planning in global workforce planning,
considering factors such as geopolitical risks, economic uncertainties, and technological
disruptions. Assess how the agency prepares for potential workforce challenges and adapts its
talent strategies in response to changing external conditions.
Global Diversity and Inclusion:
Assess the agency's commitment to diversity and inclusion in its global workforce, including
initiatives to foster a culture of belonging, respect, and equity among employees from diverse
backgrounds. Evaluate how the agency defines diversity, measures diversity metrics, and sets
goals for increasing diversity representation.
Analyze the agency's diversity and inclusion programs and initiatives, including recruitment
strategies, leadership development programs, employee resource groups, and diversity training.
Assess the effectiveness of these programs in promoting diversity awareness, mitigating bias,
and fostering an inclusive workplace culture.
Explore the agency's efforts to address systemic barriers to diversity and inclusion, such as
unconscious bias in hiring and promotion processes, unequal access to opportunities, and
microaggressions in the workplace. Assess how the agency promotes accountability and
transparency in its diversity and inclusion efforts and measures progress over time.
Global Employee Well-being:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Evaluate the agency's approach to promoting employee well-being and work-life balance in
global settings, considering factors such as remote work arrangements, flexible scheduling, and
mental health support services. Assess how the agency addresses the unique challenges and
stressors faced by employees working in international assignments or virtual teams.
Analyze the role of employee assistance programs, wellness initiatives, and resilience training in
supporting employee well-being and resilience in global contexts. Evaluate how the agency
fosters a culture of care and support for employees' physical, emotional, and psychological
health.
Explore the agency's efforts to promote work-life integration and mitigate work-related stressors,
such as excessive workload, time zone differences, and travel demands. Assess how the agency
promotes boundaries, self-care practices, and healthy lifestyle choices among employees in
diverse cultural and geographic settings.
By exploring these additional dimensions, you can gain a deeper understanding of the selected
agency's global linkages and its approach to personnel management in an international context.
This comprehensive analysis can inform strategic decision-making, drive continuous
improvement efforts, and enhance the agency's effectiveness in managing a diverse and globally
distributed workforce.
Personnel Recruitment and Hiring Practices
One of USAID's remarkable hiring practice is diversity. As pointed out earlier, USAID
employs people from across all backgrounds and this makes it one of the most diverse
organizations in the world. In order to achieve this, the agency encourages a diverse and robust
applicant pool for various positions by engaging in meetings of professional associations and job
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
fairs. Additionally, the agency conducts briefings for students and other interest groups of
people in an effort to encourage individuals from different backgrounds to join its workforce
(USAID, 2015). The other important step taken by USAID to improve its personnel recruitment
and hiring practices is the creation of the Office of Civil Rights and Diversity. This office is
responsible for promoting and fostering diversity and an inclusive workforce by addressing
issues that may affect USAID's workforce. For example, this office addresses allegations of
workplace discrimination in order to ensure that no one is treated unfairly because of their race,
religion, nationality, gender among other qualified characteristics.
The other notable aspect of USAID's recruitment and hiring processes is that it is founded
on merit and transparency. Research has established that organizations who base their hiring and
recruitments on merit report higher performance. Hiring and recruiting employees on merit and
with total transparency has enabled USAID to have qualified and highly knowledgeable
workforce and this translates to organizational success.
Employee Skills Training
Title: Personnel Recruitment and Hiring Practices
Introduction:
Recruitment and hiring are critical components of any organization's human resource system.
This section analyzes three major components of the selected agency's goals and practices
regarding the recruitment and hiring of a qualified workforce.
Recruitment Strategy:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Evaluate the agency's recruitment strategy, including its goals, target demographics, and sourcing
channels. Assess whether the agency prioritizes diversity and inclusion in its recruitment efforts
and how it attracts candidates from diverse backgrounds.
Analyze the effectiveness of the agency's recruitment methods, such as job postings, career fairs,
employee referrals, and partnerships with educational institutions or professional organizations.
Evaluate the agency's use of technology, social media, and online platforms to reach potential
candidates.
Assess the agency's branding and messaging in recruitment materials, including job descriptions,
advertisements, and career websites. Evaluate how the agency showcases its mission, values, and
culture to attract candidates who align with its organizational goals and objectives.
Selection Process:
Examine the agency's selection process for hiring a qualified workforce, including screening,
interviewing, assessment, and decision-making stages. Assess the alignment of selection criteria
with job requirements, competencies, and organizational values.
Analyze the agency's use of pre-employment assessments, such as skills tests, personality
assessments, and situational judgment tests, to evaluate candidates' suitability for the role.
Evaluate the reliability, validity, and fairness of these assessment methods in predicting job
performance.
Evaluate the agency's approach to conducting interviews, including the types of interviews used
(e.g., structured, unstructured, behavioral), interview questions, and interviewer training. Assess
how the agency assesses candidates' technical skills, interpersonal abilities, and cultural fit
during the interview process.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives:
Assess the agency's commitment to diversity and inclusion in its recruitment and hiring
practices, including initiatives to mitigate bias, promote equity, and foster a diverse workforce.
Evaluate how the agency defines diversity, measures diversity metrics, and sets goals for
increasing diversity representation.
Analyze the agency's efforts to attract and retain candidates from underrepresented groups,
including women, racial and ethnic minorities, individuals with disabilities, and LGBTQ+
individuals. Evaluate the effectiveness of diversity recruitment strategies, such as targeted
outreach, affinity groups, and diversity-focused recruitment events.
Explore the agency's use of inclusive hiring practices, such as blind resume screening, diverse
interview panels, and bias awareness training for hiring managers. Assess how the agency
creates an inclusive hiring experience for candidates and ensures equal opportunities for all
applicants regardless of background.
Conclusion:
Recruitment and hiring practices play a crucial role in shaping the composition, culture, and
performance of an organization's workforce. By analyzing the selected agency's goals and
practices regarding personnel recruitment and hiring, we can gain insights into its approach to
attracting, selecting, and retaining a qualified and diverse workforce. Recommendations may
include enhancing diversity recruitment efforts, improving selection processes, and promoting
inclusive hiring practices to build a workforce that reflects the agency's values and meets its
strategic objectives.
Recruitment Strategy:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Target Demographics and Sourcing Channels: Evaluate the agency's target demographics for
recruitment efforts, considering factors such as desired skill sets, educational backgrounds, and
diversity objectives. Assess the effectiveness of various sourcing channels used by the agency,
including job boards, social media platforms, recruitment agencies, and employee referrals.
Talent Pipelining and Relationship Building: Explore the agency's approach to talent pipelining,
which involves proactively identifying and engaging with potential candidates for future roles.
Assess the effectiveness of talent relationship management strategies, such as networking events,
talent communities, and alumni networks, in building a pool of qualified candidates.
Employer Branding and Employee Value Proposition: Analyze the agency's employer branding
efforts to attract top talent and differentiate itself as an employer of choice. Evaluate how the
agency communicates its employee value proposition (EVP), including benefits, career
development opportunities, workplace culture, and mission-driven work, to prospective
candidates.
Selection Process:
Screening and Application Review: Assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the agency's
screening process for reviewing applications and resumes. Evaluate the criteria used to shortlist
candidates for further consideration, such as relevant experience, qualifications, and alignment
with job requirements.
Interviewing Techniques and Assessment Methods: Explore the agency's interviewing
techniques and assessment methods used to evaluate candidates' competencies, skills, and
cultural fit. Assess the use of structured interviews, behavioral questions, situational judgment
tests, and work simulations to assess candidates' suitability for the role.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Selection Criteria and Decision-Making: Evaluate the clarity and consistency of selection criteria
used by the agency to make hiring decisions. Assess how hiring managers prioritize factors such
as qualifications, experience, diversity, and cultural fit when selecting candidates for job offers.
Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives:
Diversity Recruitment Strategies: Explore the agency's diversity recruitment strategies aimed at
attracting candidates from underrepresented groups. Assess the effectiveness of outreach efforts
to diverse communities, partnerships with diversity-focused organizations, and targeted
advertising campaigns in reaching diverse talent pools.
Inclusive Hiring Practices: Evaluate the agency's efforts to promote inclusive hiring practices
that mitigate bias and ensure equitable opportunities for all candidates. Assess the use of blind
resume screening, standardized interview protocols, and diversity training for hiring managers to
reduce unconscious bias in the selection process.
Diversity Metrics and Accountability: Analyze the agency's measurement and tracking of
diversity metrics, such as representation rates, retention rates, and promotion rates for
underrepresented groups. Assess how the agency holds leaders and managers accountable for
advancing diversity and inclusion goals through recruitment and hiring practices.
By examining these additional details, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the
agency's recruitment and hiring practices and their alignment with its goals and objectives. This
deeper analysis can help identify areas of strength and areas for improvement, guiding strategic
initiatives to attract, select, and retain a diverse and qualified workforce.
Recruitment Strategy:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Talent Needs Assessment: Evaluate how the agency assesses its current and future talent needs.
This assessment may involve analyzing workforce demographics, projecting future staffing
requirements based on organizational growth or turnover trends, and identifying key skill gaps.
Employer Branding: Explore the agency's efforts to cultivate a positive employer brand. This
may include showcasing the agency's mission, values, culture, and employee value proposition
through various channels such as career websites, social media, employer awards, and employer
review sites.
Diversity and Inclusion Focus: Assess the extent to which diversity and inclusion are integrated
into the agency's recruitment strategy. Look for initiatives aimed at attracting candidates from
diverse backgrounds, including targeted outreach to underrepresented groups, partnerships with
diversity-focused organizations, and participation in diversity recruitment events.
Talent Pipelining: Evaluate the agency's approach to talent pipelining, which involves building
relationships with potential candidates over time, even if there are no immediate job openings.
This may include maintaining a database of passive candidates, engaging with talent through
networking events or industry conferences, and nurturing relationships through regular
communication.
Selection Process:
Job Analysis and Role Definition: Assess how the agency conducts job analysis to define the
specific requirements and responsibilities of each role. This involves identifying the essential
competencies, skills, qualifications, and behavioral attributes necessary for success in the
position.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Structured Interviewing: Evaluate whether the agency utilizes structured interviewing techniques
to ensure consistency and fairness in the selection process. This may involve developing
standardized interview questions based on job-related competencies and using behavioral-based
interview techniques to assess candidates' past behavior and experiences.
Assessment Tools and Techniques: Explore the agency's use of assessment tools and techniques
to evaluate candidates' suitability for the role. This may include skills assessments, cognitive
ability tests, personality assessments, and situational judgment tests designed to measure specific
job-related competencies.
Candidate Experience: Consider the candidate experience throughout the selection process, from
initial application to final offer. Assess the agency's communication with candidates, timeliness
of responses, transparency about the selection process, and overall professionalism in
interactions.
Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives:
Diversity Recruitment Metrics: Evaluate the agency's tracking and measurement of diversity
recruitment metrics to assess progress toward diversity and inclusion goals. This may include
tracking the demographic composition of applicant pools, interviewees, and hires, as well as
monitoring diversity representation across different levels of the organization.
Implicit Bias Training: Assess whether the agency provides training to recruiters and hiring
managers on recognizing and mitigating unconscious bias in the recruitment and selection
process. This training may include education on the impact of bias, strategies for reducing bias in
decision-making, and promoting diversity awareness.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Diverse Interview Panels: Explore whether the agency utilizes diverse interview panels to ensure
multiple perspectives are considered in the evaluation of candidates. Having diverse interviewers
can help mitigate bias and ensure a more inclusive selection process.
Partnerships and Outreach: Evaluate the agency's partnerships and outreach efforts aimed at
expanding the diversity of its candidate pool. This may include collaborations with community
organizations, professional associations, minority-serving institutions, and diversity recruitment
events.
By examining these additional details, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the
agency's recruitment and hiring practices and their alignment with its goals and objectives. This
analysis can help identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement, guiding strategic
initiatives to attract, select, and retain a diverse and qualified workforce.
The Office of Human Capital and Talent Management is responsible for conducting
employee training and career/professional development programs as established under ADS
Chapter 458, which establishes the policy directives as well as required procedures for the
agency's training and career/professional development programs. These programs focus on
enhancing the skills, knowledge, and experience of the agency's employees in order to improve
their performance and productivity. Also, these programs aim to develop an employee's
potential to assume increased responsibility in their different positions. It is important to note
that this a major strength of USAID's approach to employee training since in so doing, it
becomes easier to ensure competency-based professional and technical training. This makes it
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
possible to keep USAID employees' knowledge and skills current and to satisfy professional
certification requirements.
Recruiting and Training Recommendations
Despite its commendable approach to recruitment, hiring, and talent development,
USAID still has a few improvements to make. First, the agency needs to increase diversity in its
recruitments, hiring and talent development in order to make its workforce more diverse. It must
align its hiring practices with the current workplace diversity trends. Also, USAID must broaden
their definition of diversity and include physical ability and disability diversity in order to ensure
even the disabled are given equal opportunities as the rest of the candidates. Age is another
important part of the diversity that USAID must integrate into their hiring practices. According
to Battaglio, (2014) the U.S population is increasingly aging and more individual is delaying
their retirement, age discrimination is increasingly gaining attention. Therefore, USAID must
find ways to realign their hiring and recruitment practices with the current dynamics. Secondly,
USAID can improve their hiring and recruitment by establishing baselines as well as
differentiators. USAID needs to build a more comprehensive matrix for different types of
candidates who they hire (Tisdell, 2013). This strategy will enable the agency to select the single
"best fit" for its candidates which will to hire the best talents who can effectively help the
realization of the agency's mission, vision, goals, and objectives.
Title: Employee Skills Training
Introduction:
Employee training and development are crucial for enhancing the knowledge, skills, and overall
competencies of individuals within an organization. This section evaluates the selected agency's
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
approach to training and programs provided for both new and existing employees, highlighting
strengths and weaknesses.
New Employee Onboarding:
Strengths:
Evaluate the comprehensiveness of the onboarding process for new employees. Look for
structured orientation programs that introduce new hires to the agency's mission, values, culture,
and policies.
Assess whether new employees receive training on essential job-related skills and competencies
necessary for their roles. Look for opportunities for hands-on learning, shadowing experienced
colleagues, and receiving mentorship or coaching.
Evaluate the agency's use of technology and online resources to facilitate self-paced learning and
access to onboarding materials, such as employee handbooks, training modules, and instructional
videos.
Weaknesses:
Identify any gaps or inconsistencies in the onboarding process that may hinder new employees'
ability to quickly integrate into their roles and contribute effectively. This could include delays in
providing necessary training or insufficient support and guidance during the transition period.
Assess the agency's evaluation mechanisms for assessing the effectiveness of the onboarding
process. Look for feedback mechanisms, surveys, or performance assessments used to gather
input from new hires and identify areas for improvement in the onboarding experience.
Skills Assessment and Gap Analysis:
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Strengths:
Evaluate the agency's processes for conducting skills assessments and gap analyses to identify
employees' current competencies and areas for improvement. Look for methods such as
performance evaluations, skills inventories, competency assessments, and 360-degree feedback.
Assess whether the agency uses data-driven approaches to inform training needs and prioritize
skill development initiatives based on organizational goals and workforce capabilities.
Evaluate the agency's alignment of training programs with identified skill gaps and strategic
objectives, ensuring that training initiatives address critical areas of need and contribute to
organizational success.
Weaknesses:
Identify any limitations or shortcomings in the agency's skills assessment and gap analysis
processes, such as outdated methodologies, lack of alignment with business priorities, or
insufficient data collection and analysis capabilities.
Assess whether the agency provides adequate support and resources for employees to address
skill gaps identified through assessments. Look for opportunities for personalized development
plans, coaching, mentoring, and peer learning initiatives to support individual growth and
development.
Conclusion:
The evaluation of the selected agency's approach to employee skills training highlights both
strengths and weaknesses in its training and development programs. By identifying areas of
success and areas for improvement, the agency can enhance its efforts to build a skilled,
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
knowledgeable, and high-performing workforce. Recommendations may include investing in
comprehensive onboarding processes, expanding access to ongoing development opportunities,
and strengthening skills assessment and gap analysis processes to better align training initiatives
with organizational goals and employee needs.
New Employee Onboarding:
Strengths:
Comprehensive Orientation: Evaluate the extent to which the agency provides a comprehensive
orientation program for new employees. This may include introductions to the agency's mission,
vision, values, policies, and procedures.
Job-Specific Training: Assess whether new employees receive training tailored to their specific
roles and responsibilities. Look for hands-on training, job shadowing opportunities, and
mentorship programs to facilitate a smooth transition into the organization.
Technology Integration: Evaluate the agency's use of technology to streamline the onboarding
process. This may include online learning modules, digital handbooks, and interactive training
platforms to facilitate self-paced learning.
Weaknesses:
Inadequate Resources: Identify any gaps in resources or support provided to new employees
during the onboarding process. This could include insufficient training materials, limited access
to mentors or support staff, or lack of clarity regarding job expectations.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Lack of Feedback Mechanisms: Assess whether the agency solicits feedback from new hires to
evaluate the effectiveness of the onboarding process. Without feedback mechanisms in place, it
may be challenging to identify areas for improvement and enhance the onboarding experience.
Ongoing Employee Development Programs:
Strengths:
Diverse Training Opportunities: Evaluate the variety of training programs and development
opportunities available to employees. This may include workshops, seminars, conferences,
online courses, and tuition reimbursement programs to support continuous learning and skill
development.
Career Development Initiatives: Assess whether the agency offers career development programs
aimed at fostering employee growth and advancement. This could include leadership
development programs, mentorship opportunities, and rotational assignments to develop future
leaders within the organization.
Culture of Learning: Evaluate the agency's culture and values regarding learning and
development. Look for initiatives that promote a growth mindset, encourage knowledge sharing,
and recognize employees' efforts in pursuing professional development opportunities.
Weaknesses:
Accessibility Issues: Identify any barriers that may prevent employees from accessing training
and development programs. This could include limited availability of resources, scheduling
conflicts, or lack of awareness about available opportunities.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Evaluation and Feedback: Assess whether the agency has mechanisms in place to evaluate the
effectiveness of training programs and gather feedback from participants. Without regular
evaluation and feedback loops, it may be challenging to assess the impact of training initiatives
and make necessary adjustments.
Skills Assessment and Gap Analysis:
Strengths:
Comprehensive Assessment Methods: Evaluate the agency's methods for assessing employees'
skills, knowledge, and competencies. This may include performance evaluations, skills
assessments, competency-based interviews, and psychometric testing to identify strengths and
areas for improvement.
Data-Driven Approach: Assess whether the agency uses data and analytics to inform skills
assessment and gap analysis. This could involve tracking performance metrics, analyzing
training needs based on organizational goals, and using predictive analytics to anticipate future
skill requirements.
Conclusion:
By evaluating each aspect of the agency's approach to employee skills training, including
strengths and weaknesses, the agency can identify areas for improvement and develop strategies
to enhance its training and development programs. This comprehensive analysis can help the
agency build a skilled, knowledgeable, and high-performing workforce that is equipped to meet
current and future challenges. Recommendations may include investing in resources for
onboarding and development, fostering a culture of continuous learning, and leveraging data-
driven insights to inform skills assessment and training initiatives.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
Conclusion
This paper has evaluated USAID's public personnel administration and to offer
recommendations for improving core areas of recruitment and training qualified staff. The
agency has performed exemplarily in its personnel management practices but, as pointed out
above, there are a few improvements that other agency should make to enhance its personnel
management abilities.
EVALUATION OF AGENCY’S PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
References
Battaglio, R. P. (2014). Public human resource management: Strategies and practices in the 21st
century.
Tisdell, C. A. (2013). Competition, diversity and economic performance. Edward Elgar
Publishing.
USAID, (2015). "ADS Chapter 458 Training and Career/Professional Development." Retrieved
from https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1877/458.pdf
USAID, (2015)." ADS Chapter 411 Employment Rights and Benefits of Employees Who
Perform Active Military Duty." Retrieved from
https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1877/411.pdf
Students also viewed