Running head: ARGUMENT RESPONSE
Argument Response
Author's Name
Institutional Affiliation
ARGUMENT RESPONSE
Argument Response :
ReadthearticlesandmaterialthatIdistributedaboutMiller,thecourtdecision,andLarryNewton’s
appeal.Inaresponse,stateapositionasamainidea:doyouagreewiththeCourt’sopinionabout
makinglifesentencesforjuveniles(age17andunder)notmandatory?ThenprovideONEreasonand
supportthatONEreason.Also,somewhereinyourresponse,alsoanswerifyouthinkthatLarry
Newton,whocametoprisonatage17,shouldspendtherestofhislifeinprison.Usetwoquotations
fromanywhereinBates’novelandattwoquotationsfromanyonthefivesourcesbelow.CITE IN-TEXT
PROPERLY.
Material Re: Supreme Court decision about juvenile offenders
“MillerV.Alabama”
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-9646
”Millerv.AlabamaandJuvenileLifewithoutParoleLaws”byAnneTeigenApril20,2017
http://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and- criminal -justice/miller-v-alabama-and-juvenile-life-without-
parole-laws.aspx
“TheOffendersBehind3CourtCasesThatChangedLifetimeImprisonmentLawsforJuveniles”by
AdamJanosApril92019
https://www.aetv.com/shows/kids-behind-bars/real-crime/terrance-graham-florida-evan-miller-
alabama-henry-montgomery-louisiana-cases-life
“WasEvanMiller‘TheRareJuvenile’WhoDeservedLifeWithoutParole?”
ByBethSchwartzapfelMarch122017
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2017/03/12/was-evan-miller-the-rare-juvenile-who-deserved-life-