Subject – Choosing the suitable option that would provide the company maximum financial
benefit
Comparison of financial benefits of Option A and Option B
The automobile business has decided to incorporate internet of things (IoT) technology into
its vehicles. Before finalizing the innovative option, it is necessary to conduct a critical
comparison of the available innovative options. In the memo, the financial benefits
associated with both the options has been examined and the option that would be of higher
financial benefit for the company has been identified.
Sales Forecast
The sales forecast has been conducted to identify whether Option A or Option B would
produce better sales figure for the company. By choosing the innovative option, the
company is expected to showcase a solid sales turnover of connected cars at the end of the
forecasted period. The company would be able to grow connected cars at 10.2 % per year
for 2 years, and then the growth of the connected cars segment would take place at 25 %
per year. It could boost its overall sales turnover figure.
In case the company would opt for Option B, the sales forecast of connected car segment
would be lower as compared to that of Option A. The company would be able to grow
connected cars at 10.2 % per year for the entire forecasted period.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
12345678910 11
Sales Connected 3.8 4.18765.23455.76847.21059.013211.26614.08317.60422.00527.506
Sales Traditional 183.3 188.71194.27199.96 205.8 211.78217.91224.18230.59237.16244.09
Salescc forecastcc datacc -cc Optioncc Acc cc
Sales Traditional Sales Connected
Gross Profit Margin Forecast
A comparison of the gross profit margin forecast has been carried out to identify the option
that would be more feasible and financially beneficial for the business entity. This analytical
metric has been evaluated as it sheds light on the efficiency of the automobile business to
manage its business operations while incorporating the Internet of Things technology in its
connected vehicles.
The table that has been presented below shows that Option A would be a more profitable
alternative for the company. It would enable the business to efficiently and productively
carry out the business operations by maintaining a higher gross profit margin during the
forecasted period.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Sales Connected 3.8 4.1876 4.614745.085445.604156.175786.805717.499898.264889.10789 10.11
Sales Traditional 183.3 188.713194.265 199.96 205.798211.779217.906224.178230.595237.157 244.09
Salescc forecastcc datacc -cc Optioncc B
Sales Traditional Sales Connected
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Option B 28.293 29.1863 30.1089 31.0619 32.0465 33.0638 34.1151 35.2017 36.3249 37.4861 38.7366
Option A 28.293 29.1863 30.239 31.2053 32.3838 33.6597 35.0519 36.5841 38.286 40.1945 42.3898
Grosscc Profitcc Margincc Forecastcc -cc Optioncc Acc andcc B
Option A Option B
Gross Margin less RD and capital costs
The line chart that has been presented below sheds light on the net gross margin of the
business after adjusting the research and development and capital costs. Option A seems to
be a better option for the automobile business as it would help it to generate a higher gross
margin after deducting the costs relating to the research and development aspects and
capital costs. In the long run, the company would be able to derive financial benefit which
could improve its financial position and portability in the competitive market environment. cc
Conclusion from data visualizations
The detailed evaluation of both the available innovative options have been carried out so
that the automobile company would be able to choose the option that would be more
beneficial financially. After comparing the sales forecast, gross profit margin forecast and
gross margin less RD and capital costs for Option A as well as Option B it has been
identified that the company must choose Option A while choosing an innovative option to
integrate the IoT technology in its connected vehicles. For example, if the company chooses
Option A it is expected that its sales forecast would increase at 10.2 % per year for the
initial two years and then the growth rate would be 25 % per year. In the competitive and
dynamic business landscape, the first option (Option A) would give rise to a host of new
12345678910 11
Option A 24.193 25.0533 29.072 30.003331.145832.384533.738435.231336.892638.759240.9114
Option B 27.193 28.053328.941929.859930.808431.788632.801633.848834.931436.050937.2583
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45 Grosscc Margincc lesscc RDcc andcc capitalcc costscc
Option A
Option B
opportunities in the connected car segment which would reflect on its solid sales
performance in the future.
Thanking You
