Standardization promotes productivity by eliminating inefficiency and ambiguity making sure
all facilities in healthcare and providers are going by the same codes and guidelines. This
allows everyone to be on the same page while also improving data quality. using coding ICD-
10, CPT, and HCPCS ensures codes are correct and consistent and are used for treatments
during impatient stay in medical facility. ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS and Level II for supplies
and use of different services during outpatient care is for one visit of direct care uses these
standardized codes.
The difference between inpatient and outpatient coding is the reason a patient was seen in a
healthcare facility. Also, when a patient problems or certain conditions are eliminated or ruled
out, they are coded before the final determination is ruled as the diagnosis
How does standardization improve efficiency with coding?
Standardization improves coding efficiency by ensuring that clinical terminologies have the
same meaning across different systems. Using code sets and classification systems such as
ICD-10-CM, CPT, HCPS, RxNorm, LOINC, etc; helps avoid ambiguity that can cause
misinterpretations and errors in coding (Data Standards in Healthcare, 2020).
How is this different with inpatient versus outpatient coding?
There are three different ways that outpatient coding differs from inpatient coding:
"The definition of principal diagnosis
The coding of inconclusive diagnoses
Reporting from diagnostic test results (x-rays, pathology, etc.)" (Jurek & Mosay, 2017).
Standardization enables everyone to be on the same page with coding. When the coding team
and healthcare professionals go by the same set of coding standards it makes the coding
process run more efficient. If everyone just coded what they wanted, the coding process would
never be consistent. Healthcare facilities and insurance companies could charge patients
whatever they wanted for services.
The difference between inpatient and outpatient coding is that inpatient coding is usually set
up to cover multiple days of providing healthcare services. Outpatient coding on the other
hand is a shorter process, and usually involves one day of service. Also, inpatient coding has
more diagnostic testing and imaging involved to arrive at a diagnosis for the patient’s
treatment. Outpatient coding usually revolves around procedures and are more
straightforward.
Standardization is going to help speed up any process. In my last coding class, we talked about
data dictionaries and vocabulary. I think that fits into this discussion. Anytime you can define
a specific term and use it over the course of each chart, it is going to help the next person
understand the chart. I think it also helps a medical provider be more specific when there are
more codes for a specific diagnosis. For instance, appendicitis, the doctor might just put that in
the past, but now we have codes to specify gangrene with that. I think it helps to have those
options now so we can narrow down the type. When we have synonyms that can be used to
locate terms as well as the actual name that helps as well. In a medical chart, it is important for
the documentation to be specific. That is why coding is nice. We have CPT, PCS, E/M levels,
clinic codes, ICD-10 codes, and HCPCS codes. All those sets already have the terms defined.
If you look at a CPT code, it is going to give you a description and idea of what you need to
use that code. In diagnosis codes on ICD-10, you also have a code definition. Those help us
narrow down what a diagnosis should be vs. just having a symptom. I think the hard part of
standardization is when there is not a specific code. It is almost frustrating when you must
code a NEC or an unlisted procedure. From my experience, insurance companies do not like
that either.
However, it is getting clearer with additions each year. According to Kaufmann, "the
advantages of standardizing healthcare terms outweigh the major efforts to combat the issue
around unstructured data and interoperability." Being able to use specific language helps to be
able to extract data when it comes to interoperability. This also helps transfer the data between
different systems. If everyone uses the same language, everyone can understand it.
Meaningful use is a big deal for driving more standardization to promote interoperability. It
encourages the use of EHRs, which are trying "to improve quality, safety, efficiency, and
reduce health disparities, improve care coordination, improve population and public health,
engage patients and their families in their own health care, and ensuring that patient privacy
and security is maintained according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule" (aanem).
In inpatient coding, they use ICD-10-PCS for procedures while outpatient is going to use CPT.
ICD-10-CM is used for both inpatient and outpatient for diagnosis. HCPCS 2 can be used for
outpatient codes for medical equipment. There is a coding format for all different types of
services. I never coded the system before 10, but from what I gather, it was not very specific.
Now we have specifications of right vs left in fractures, leg pain, and cellulitis. There are also
codes now to specify what type of stage a kidney failure is happening. It even goes down to
stage 3a and b. I think what they are trying to do is great. Coding and extracting data can really
help us in the future. We can look at certain treatments and see how they worked on a wide
variety of patients. I think medical research is amazing. It's also nice for a provider to have
access to records faster and be able to understand what the other doctor said based on him
having that diagnosis code. I think it also helps the patient understand. From reading surgeries,
myself... I think reading the description of the code is so much more simplified.
Standardization improves efficacy with coding by eliminating the challenges that
interpretations can create. The standardizations lead to a better patient outcome.
Standardization improves the patient out come by levelling the path for interoperability,
reporting, and workflow improvement. Having the standards and guidelines to choose the
appropriate code will help with documenting procedural history and allow for proper claim
submission. This applies for both inpatient and outpatient coding. Using ICD-10 PCS uses a
method of breaking down the coding process with individualizing each component. CPT
coding lends to a broader description of the procedure. Both have standard and guidelines but
are concluded differently.
The standardization process can improve the efficiency of coding by promoting the level of
productivity. It can eliminate the chances of inefficiencies in the context of coding. By
focusing on standardization, it is possible to remove any kind of ambiguity, which can
increase the quality by offering better quality control. When users leverage standardization
while coding, they can accomplish tasks in a more efficient manner. The level of efficiency is
boosted because there exist fewer quality control challenges and issues. It also enhances the
level of consistency (Piedade et al., 2020). In the healthcare context, the standardization of
codes is considered highly critical as it can directly influence the efficiency in the processes.
There exists a considerable difference between the standardization of inpatient and outpatient
coding.
In inpatient coding, the objective is to report a patient’s diagnosis as well as services based on
the duration of the stay. The standardization is done by using ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes for
the purpose of billing. For reimbursement purpose, ICD-10-PCS is used as the procedural
coding system. Standardization ensures that the suitable codes area followed and accurate
coding protocols are followed when a patient is admitted in a healthcare facility (Basic
medical coding - ICS Canada, 2021). However, in the context of outpatient coding, the process
is different because it involves a patient who is being treated but is not admitted to the facility
for a specific duration of stay. The outpatient coding that is used is based upon the ICD-10-
CM diagnosis code for billing purposes. For reporting accurate procurements, a CPT or
HCPCS is used. The role of documentation is of paramount importance in the case of
outpatient coding (CPT E/M Office revisions | AMA - American medical association, 2021).
The effective use of standardization with both inpatient and outpatient coding is extremely
critical as it can impact the accuracy and consistency in the coding processes.
Standardization helps prevent confusion among different medical terminologies and codes.
This can improve efficiency because it prevents misinterpretations among staff and ensures
that documents are dictated correctly and that claims are billed properly for payment. Having
standardization can cause an increase in productivity as well because it will reduce the number
of errors made. This causes claims to be sent out faster which will make the billing process
quicker overall This is different with inpatient and outpatient coding because inpatient coding
uses ICD1 pcs and outpatient uses cpt codes. Outpatient charts usually do not have a definite
diagnosis versus inpatient coding.
In the medical field there are many situations in which there are multiple terms for a single
item or action, so it is important to have standardization to keep things clear and organized.
This is especially so, now that most operations are done digitally with computers that cannot
use intuition or context clues to determine what is meant when the text isn't clear or in the right
place. The problem only expands when dealing with multiple different systems all trying to
communicate with each other, such as in the case with an HIE.
Inpatient coding and outpatient coding are like a point but require a slightly different skillset to
be effective. An example of a difference would be that because outpatient encounters may not
have a definitive diagnosis, they must be coded differently than an inpatient stay. There are
also separate guidelines to follow depending on whether you are doing inpatient or outpatient
coding, like how HIPAA mandates the use of CPT/HCPCS codes instead of ICD-10-PCS
codes for outpatient procedural reporting (Jurek et al., 2017).
Standardization improves efficiency with coding by ensuring that data is captured accurately
and consistently. Also, to ensure that healthcare claims are processed properly for medicare
and Medicaid and other health programs. The data that is coded can have far-reaching effects
beyond provision of care. They are used for a variety of reporting requirements, such as
registries, indexing of disease and operations, prospective payment systems, fee schedule
billing, health plan insurance coverage, medical necessity justification, quality measurements,
vital statistics, public health, and much more.
Outpatient refers to a patient who checks into the ER and is being treated but is not admitted to
the hospital for an extended stay. The patient is usually released from the hospital the same
day within 24 hours. When a patient is formally admitted to a hospital upon the physician’s
orders who then take care of your extended stay at the hospital stay, he/she is considered an
inpatient. Outpatient coding refers to a detailed diagnosis report in which the patient is
generally treated in one visit, whereas an inpatient coding system is used to report a patient’s
diagnosis and services based on their extended stay.
It is important when coding to know the difference from impatient coding to outpatient
coding. Outpatient refers to to a patient who is being treated but not admitted under the care of
a hospital or extended stay and is released within 24 hours. Even if a patient stays for over 24
hours, they can still be considered an outpatient. The outpatient coding is based on the ICD-10-
CM diagnostic codes for billing and appropriate reimbursement, but uses CPT and HCPCS
coding system to report procedures.
Since moving from paper records to electronic records, we have made some huge strides to
improve efficiency with medical coding. We can share patient health information across many
different platforms to facilitate patient care between specialists (Rowe 2013). Patient’s EMR’s
hold a wide array of patient information from the very first visit they have had to the last
appointment they have had. Patients also have access to their patient information sometimes in
the form of a patient portal. All they have to do is create a username and password and sign on
and all their personal health information is at their fingertips.
Inpatient and outpatient coding differ because inpatient codes are used to get paid for
physician services and diagnoses throughout a patient’s entire stay whereas outpatient codes
are for a diagnosis and physician services assigned in one single visit.
Standardization is the process in healthcare where a recognizable pattern is established and
followed in coding. This process promotes productivity and efficiency. When standardization
is used healthcare data is captured accurately and consistently and ensures proper payment by
insurance companies. By using standardization, the doctor's entry will make sense to other
providers, researchers, and policymakers regardless of where and how its accessed and allows
for the sharing of patient's information. Standardization also allows for workflow
improvement by allowing for the use of synonyms that providers can use that are
automatically converted into code.
Inpatient and outpatient coding is different because of doctor's orders. Inpatient is when a
provider has admitted a patient to the hospital while outpatient is when a patient is treated but
not admitted to the hospital. When coding for inpatient, coding becomes more complex and
both ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS are used. For outpatient coding, ICD-10-CM, CPTs, or
HCPCS are used to show the services and supplies provided in the outpatient setting.
Outpatient coding refers to a detailed diagnostic report in which the patient is generally treated
in one visit, while inpatient coding is used to report a patient's diagnosis and services based on
an extended stay.
5 pluses of standardized coding | Healthcare IT News
Inpatient Coding Vs Outpatient Coding - Leading Medical Billing Outsourcing Services
Company in the USA (medisysdata.com)
Rowe, J. (2013, September 24). 5 pluses of standardized coding. In Healthcare IT News.
Retrieved from https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/5-pluses-standardized-coding
Dotson, P. (2013, December). CPT® codes: What are they, why are they necessary, and how
are they developed? Advances in wound care. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865623/
New focus on process and measure: Raising data quality with a standard coding workflow and
benchmarks. Journal of AHIMA. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2022, from
https://library.ahima.org/doc?oid=78703#.Yen_pi9h1QI
Jurek, J. H., Mosay, S., & Neris, D. (2017). Conquer Medical Coding 2018 A Critical
Thinking Approach with Coding Simulations (3rd ed.) [E-book]. F A Davis.
Basic medical coding - ICS Canada. (2021). Retrieved January 21, 2022, from
https://www.icslearn.ca/~/media/files/pdf/samplelessons/582-basic-medical-coding.pdf?la=en
CPT E/M Office revisions | AMA - American medical association. (2021). Retrieved January
21, 2022, from https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-06/cpt-revised-mdm-grid.pdf
Piedade, E. de sousa, & Brown, J. (2020, November 13). Why process standardization
improves quality, productivity, and morale: Process Street: Checklist, Workflow and SOP
software. Process Street. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from https://www.process.st/process-
standardization/#:~:text=Standardization%20promotes%20productivity%20by%20eliminatin
g,correctly%20the%20first%20time%20around.%20In
Kaufmann, K. (2019, June 18). Standardizing healthcare terms: Challenges, benefits, and
future -. Perficient Blogs. Retrieved January 20, 2022, from
https://blogs.perficient.com/2019/07/09/standardizing-healthcare-terms-challenges-benefits-
future/
(n.d) Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Meaningful Use (MU). Retrieved January 20,
2022, from EHR-and-Meaningful-Use.pdf.aspx (aanem.org)
AltexSoft. (2020, October 23). Data Standards in Healthcare: Codes, documents, and
exchange formats. AltexSoft. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from
https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/data-standards-healthcare/
Jurek, J., & Mosay, S. (2017). Conquer medical coding 2018: A critical thinking approach
with coding simulations. F. A. Davis Company.
