Ashley Allen
Southern New Hampshire University
Eng 123
1-6 Journal From Problem to Persuasion
I'll start off by talking about a topic that has to do with my possible career: how safe or
private cloud storage data is. With the widespread availability of the technology to store
enormous quantities of data on the cloud, the topic of how private my data should be has
emerged. On the one hand, having easy access to your data by government organizations may
make it easier to fight the rising number of online crimes. It could also be viewed as an invasion
of your privacy. This is relevant to my area since it deals with the amount of access that a
business provides to other individuals or groups. I think businesses should restrict who else has
access to your information, and specifying who is allowed access can help individuals determine
whether cloud storage is the best option for them.
Should consumer level DNA test results be made available to law enforcement agencies?
is the second topic I shall discuss that is relevant to my possible employment. Due to how private
DNA is and the potential uses, many people find the concept of the government having access to
their genetic information repugnant. However, giving the government—whether local, state, or
federal—access to the databases that businesses maintain can speed up the investigation of
felonies. For the sole intention of identifying Dna evidence gathered as forensic evidence, I think
the authorities should have access to these registries. Sending the DNA sample to the firms, who
would then check their profiles for a connection and then give just that client's information to the
law enforcement officers, is one method the administration may use to protect some kind of
discretion.
The majority of individuals do not, in my opinion, have a realistic need for a personal
NAS (network attached storage), which are containers that are accessible over the network. This
is because configuring it to meet their requirements could necessitate specialist knowledge. I
think that for the majority of people, file sharing is a solid option for staying secure from a
disaster that can damage laptops or memory cards, like a fire or flood. People searching for a
secure, visible means to keep storage space will be my core demographic for this issue. I find
myself wondering whether I should really be persuaded by viewpoint since microsoft azure is a
reasonably simple and secure way to keep information in the absence of clear learning
confidentiality restrictions.
Regarding my second reservation, I think that giving the authorities unauthorized access
to private firm DNA databases on a need-to-know basis will advance law enforcement
investigations. I think it wouldn't be a violation of anyone's privacy to provide the government's
law enforcement agencies access to only the one file that is a match for the relevant DNA.
Anyone who is contemplating or has undergone a Paternity test and is concerned that their DNA
may be utilized for another reason without their agreement would be my target audience. In light
of the potential for apprehending criminals and advancing investigations that had otherwise
reached a standstill, I believe that this is a crucial issue worth persuading people to believe in.
