1 / 3100%
I was unaware that Psychology faculty members often don’t feel prepared for
educating students. According to Bernstein, Franz & Chew (2020), academia is somewhat
like the survival of the fittest. I agree with the seven principles that were addressed by
Bernstein, et al., (2020). There must be a positive and active interaction to maintain a good
rapport within the relationships of students with faculty as well as within students with
other students. The continual communication and participation between and within these
groups creates a “team effort” mindset. Often when a team is created, there is a greater
chance to provide assistance and not allow a single “student soldier” to fail the life mission.
The ability of all to gain additional knowledge or view a different perspective in addition to
one’s own perspective is aligned with the old saying, two heads are better than one.
However, I agree with Bernstein et al., (2020) that it is mandatory that the
communications between the entities are motivation builders and not hinderances. I have
had great instructors that have a great intellectual gift, but they did not create an atmosphere
in which students could feel empowered for encountering instances such as domineering
assignments. These instructors might use different terminology so the student might look
deeper in the question that was asked. Or the instructor might ask another student to “piggy
back” on what the other student addressed and expound the sane point from a different
angle. The great instructor does not put undue pressure or address the student in a
condescending manner. However, the instructor promptly responds according to the manner
the scripture mentions “speak the truth in love” (MEV, Eph. 4: 15). The instructor as well
as the students receive better results when they “edify” (MEV, 1 Thes. 5:11) each other.
I also liked the fact that the authors acknowledged active learning. This type
instructor realizes that even though active learning may work great in some settings, all
settings may not produce the same results for each individual. It is important to be aware
that different students within the same cohorts have different cognitive processes related to
learning as well as different circumstances outside of the classroom. The students may
undergraduate or graduate students with different levels of maturity. The students may have
different learning styles (hands on, visual, or listening) or learning speeds (faster, slower).
The students may have to take evening face to face classes or online classes related to other
commitments. A great instructor combines these modalities and creates attainable goals that
everyone can strive for. They ensure that the syllabus and the projects are in appropriate
sizes for those students that work faster as well as those that work slower. Research has
analyzed and found results that effective teachers exhibit behaviors that positively correlate
with student learning (Bernstein, et al., 2020).
I have found that from the few bad instructors I experienced, there seemed to be an
atmosphere of classroom antagonism created. The one instructor walked in and the
classroom and the students were introduced with the understanding that it would be the
most difficult class we experienced, because it was the instructor’s job to ensure the
students learned the material correctly. Another instructor seemed to get out of “instructor
mode” after introducing a topic of trivia, “working fast food or not working fast food after
high school”. I felt uneasy for the reaction the students received that mentioned they did not
“work fast food”. a The instructor seemed to turn the topic into a “them” versus “us”
discussion. The verdict from the professor was that “you are not better than me because you
did not work fast food”. Another instructor that I encountered did not speak with clarity. He
was highly intellectual. Unfortunately, that was where he remained, seemingly aloof and
unreachable to the students. Many of the students complained that this was a horrible
instructor. The content that was delivered may have been graded as an A+. But, the
characteristics of teaching behavior would have received an F+ due to the fast pace and
inactive learning style within the learning environment.
I do believe that the Teacher’s Behavior Checklist (TBC; Bernstein et al., 2020;
Buskit et al., 2002; Keely et al., 2006) and items such as instructors: being themselves ,
competent and caring in addition to personable, flexible, and encouraging would have
provided greater insight for the instructor to be better informed with ideas of how to relate
to the students and how to have greater academic success for that class of instruction. It
stands to reason that when the instructor is presenting the best they can offer they will seek
the tools to reach the students. It also would seem that whatever audience the instructor
addresses (older or younger, online or face to face, single parents or married with families)
the goal would be for the same benefit of student success. a Waitoki, Nikora, & Awatere-
Masters (2016) mandate that knowledge is related to wholeness (spiritually, socially and
ecologically). This should be the goal for instructors and students alike in the educational
system. Have you any of your experiences in the classroom ever seem to have been
hindered by lack of connection with the instructor?
References
Bernstein, D. A., Frantz, S., & Chew S. (2020). Teaching Psychology: A step – by – step
guide.
(3rd ed). Taylor & Francis, Routledge, NY. doi. htpps://doi-org.ez.proxy.liberty.edu/
10.4324/9780429031823. ISBN 13 978-0-367-14394-7.
Modern Evangelist Version (2014). Breakthrough Jubilee Bible, Military Bible.
Waitoki,W. Nikora, L. Awatere-Masters, B. (2016). Teaching Psychology. International
Journal
of Psychology. 51(S1).doi. https://doi-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1002/ijop.12354
Students also viewed